armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Crackajg
The Resume

More By Crackajg

Fantasy Football 2009's Comatose Sleepers
13 votes, 7 comments
The Freudian Fumble Quiz: What Kind of Fantasy Football Personality Do You Have?
17 votes, 11 comments
Seventh Heaven: The Top Seven Fantasy Rookie Running Backs of 2009
5 votes, 0 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The Powerless Rankings (4/10/08)

by Crackajg
created April 10, 2008, last edited February 10, 2009
18
Vote

We all know and love (or possibly hate) the phenomenon known as Power Rankings. They provide just about anyone an opportunity to give their opinion on who the best teams are each week in any given league. But don’t we owe it to ourselves to know who the bad teams are as well? Sport Crack is proud to present a new weekly feature: The Powerless Rankings!

Rankings are done in reverse order, with 1 being the worst and 5 being the fifth worse… as if I needed to tell you. Rankings are also done on how the team is performing thus far with little to no regard of how they should be doing (I‘m looking at you Detroit). This is so the rankings will not be biased on previous years performance and will just be focused on the here and now. Oh, and please feel free to disagree vehemently in the comments. Thank you.

5. San Francisco Giants (3-6, LW: N/A) - The Giants pitching staff can be credited with the majority of the club’s three wins thus far. The offense? Well, the offense -- minus Bengie Molina -- cannot be credited with the wins. Unless you define credit as scoring 19 runs in 9 games. They did score 6 runs in the last two games though, so maybe they’ve finally gotten their act together.

Prognosis: Expect much of the same.

4. Houston Astros (3-7, LW: N/A) - It’s common knowledge the Astros have a strong offense. Too bad it hasn’t caught fire yet, because the pitching has done nothing to help matters. Although they didn’t let up too many runs, a mixture of mediocre pitching and mediocre batting will give you a mediocre performance for the first week. Hey, maybe Roger Clemens will come back mid-season to help them out... oh, that's right -- he's disgraced himself so badly he's unlikely to surface anywhere ever again. Or maybe he'll just be arrested for lying under oath... who knows. Too bad for the Astros, though.

Prognosis: Depending on when the offense decides to wake up -- don’t expect them to do much of anything.

3. Pittsburgh Pirates (3-5, LW: N/A) - Opposing offenses have scored a league high 54 runs against the Pirates pitching staff. Not to mention, they are 0-2 at home. If they can’t win at PNC park, than where can they win at? The offense has looked promising, so if they can get their pitching staff in order even just a tiny bit they could still turn it around.

Prognosis: Until their pitching staff realizes it’s not spring training anymore, expect the same as the previous eight games.

2. Washington Nationals (3-6, LW: N/A) - Sure, they started off great -- winning their first three games. Then they proceeded to drop their next six games. It’s not looking any better either, with the Braves coming to town on Friday for a trio of weekend games. Seriously though, six games in a row?

Prognosis: Even if they break their slump, their still in the bottom third of the league.

And this week's "Winner" is...

1. Detroit Tigers (1-7, LW: N/A) - Speaking of six games in a row... I can’t remember any season in which a team that was supposed to be so good and looked so stacked on paper started so anemically. The good thing for them is they at least looked like the Tigers team they should have been in Wednesday’s game against the Red Sox. Is it just a slow start to the season or is this a legit preview of what’s to come from the Tigers -- the same team many people picked to win the World Series?

Prognosis: Barring half their team seemingly losing all of their baseball skill (Hmm, I wonder how that could happen)… expect them to be the Tigers of yore very, very soon.

Honorable mentions: Seattle Mariners, Atlanta Braves, and the (gasp) New York Mets


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
WizardmanRed-Shirting
618 days ago
Score 2+-
Well, the Tigers are an easy choice for first. Granted, the Royals aren't as bad as they were being considered. that's still no excuse for a 1-7 start.
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
618 days ago
Score 2+-
1-8 yesterday, 2-8 now. They just got a win over the Chicago White Sox (5-2). The thing about the Tigers (and the thing I took in consideration, which is why I'm not as surprised as everyone else about this) is that #1: they're going to have to rely on their offense more than anything this season. If Renteria, Polanco, Magglio, Guillen, Cabrera, and Granderson (when he comes back) don't all produce, the Tigers won't find themselves in the playoffs. And that's the other thing: Granderson... he's injured, which is definitely not good. If you're missing the leadoff hitter, how do you expect to get runs from the top of the lineup, or to not leave the #8 an 9 hitters stranded. And another thing, the Tigers are making all of these changes that they need to adapt to. They can't rely on Kenny Rogers like they have before, since he's really get up there in age (43... and the oldest player to play in the MLB in the 2008 season so far), so you can't rely on him for much. D-Train? I don't even know why they picked him up. He was declining ever since his rookie year. Sure, get Miggy, but leave D-trainwreck out of it. You just traded 5 prospects for a very good 3B and a sucky starting pitcher that you're probably going to get only 7 wins out of this whole season. But getting back to the point, changes... there's probably something in the team chemistry of the Tigers that's not in their benefit. In 2006, they did great because they could work so well together. Did they have an amazing starting rotation? No. Did they have the same amazing lineup? Yes, but this season's should be better. They just have to get in sync, that's all. Work together... that's how you win ballgames.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
618 days ago
Score 2+-
I like the idea of having a "bottom 5" of sorts on AGM. We all talk about the winners and front runners all day so let's talk underdogs.
Permalink | Reply
CrackajgDraft Pick
618 days ago
Score 1+-
Or in this case: under-underdogs. :P
Permalink
Cougar2000All-American
617 days ago
Score 0+-
Yes... but they've lost Willis for a while because of the injury on a slick mound at US Cellular. Without him, they're basically screwed.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Crackajg | April 10, 2008 | April 2008 | MLB Opinions | Powerless rankings Opinions | Power rankings Opinions | San Francisco Giants Opinions | Washington Nationals Opinions | Detroit Tigers Opinions | Houston Astros Opinions | Pittsburgh Pirates Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Play the Quiz Game

Who gave up Barry Bonds Record Breaking 756th Home Run

New Articles

If the NFL was a 2009 High School...
Trade Talk For Uggla Heating Up?
Thursday Night Football Predictions: Colts vs. Jaguars
Week 15 Preview and Predictions
Week 15 Power Rankings: Playoff Comparison Strategy

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:The_Powerless_Rankings_%284/10/08%29"

This page was last modified 18:28, 12 April 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise