armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Your very late NFL Season Preview: Playoffs

11
Vote

by Suckatsports

Just like when I was back in school, I like waiting till the very last moment to get something done. Everyone's already posted their NFL previews. Some go team by team in a very detailed fashion. As I've already stated, I'm much too lazy for that, so we'll go division by division. That of course leads right into the playoffs - and your Superbowl winner. What, too early? Some picked the winner a week after the last Superbowl was finished. I think I'm late on this!

Playoffs? You're talking about playoffs? I just hope we win a game! The immortal words of the greatest father-son coaching tandem in NFL history - The Mora Sisters - still ring true to this day. I don't want to drag this out any longer, the suspense was killing me, but here are your bullet-proof picks for playoffs, and the Superbowl.

AFC : Let me just knock a few things out immediately - Chargers, Jets, Bengals, and Colts will not be in the AFC championship game. Chargers because they have Norv Turner, and his resume speaks for himself. Jets, because they will play on the first weekend against fairly strong division winners. Bengals have a defense that makes the best impersonation of a sieve. And Colts because they're about to revert to their pre-defense days. So, AFC championship comes down between the immortal team that [almost] never loses in the playoffs and half a team. Patriots take this, because I take Bill over Brian, Adelius over Ray, and Brady over McNair, and really, who wouldn't? Hard to bet against a team that looks like a juggernaut.

NFC : It's hard not to pick the Iggles to get back to their pattern of losing NFC Championship games, so I'm not going to do it. The fact is, the NFC is fairly weak, and the best team on paper happens to be the Chicago Bears. Unfortunately, they also have one Rex Grossman under center bobbling snaps. I don't trust him in the regular season, and even less so in the playoffs. Even though the defense doesn't look that promising, the Saints bandwagon is high off the ground, and I think I'll injure myself if I jump off, so I'm still on in the meantime. Eagles fall again in the NFC championship game, this time to the New Orleans Saints. It's the second feel good story in as many years for that team.

Superbowl: A very sexy match up of David against Goliath, the scrappy team that could, against a legendary monopoly of the Lombardi Trophy. We've seen this before, in 2001, when the scrappy team that could occupied the opposite sideline of the mighty St. Louis Rams - New England Patriots - and that turned out to be one of the most fun Superbowls. In a colossal upset, I pick the team with a history of futility in the playoffs to knock off one of the most perfect post-season assassination machines in the history of the NFL.

Saints 34, Patriots 21. '

Like what you read? This post is cross-published from We Suck at Sports.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Donnie35JV Squad
840 days ago
Score 2+-
My prediction is very similar to yours however I have the Eagles going to the Superbowl and losing to the Patriots 28-27.
Permalink | Reply
IlliniEdVarsity
840 days ago
Score 1+-
Esxplain to me why you are picking against a team that made it to the super bowl last year with the "unreliable" rex grossman and are infact stronger on offense this year than last. In addition, the biggest jump in terms of play for a QB is from the 1st year of starting(rex lsat year) to the second year of starting (rex this year). We are the class of the NFC and should be the favorites to be back for Super Bowl XLII.
Permalink | Reply
SuckatsportsVarsity
840 days ago
Score 1+-
Ed, you play in an extremely weak conference and division, so I got you going to the playoffs, which is pretty obvious. However, I don't trust Rex Grossman to throw me out of a paper bag. He's not going to improve because his real problem is mechanics, he's sloppy, and he doesn't take the time to get better. He's always had a good arm, but he's a gun slinger, and not a winner. Also, add to the fact that you lost probably your best and most reliable offensive weapon in Thomas Jones. I know Benson is there, and if you love fumbles - that's great.

In addition to that, everyone in your conference and division got better, last year my high school team could have gone to the Superbowl from the NFC. Eagles get Donovan back, and if you remember correctly, he torched you guys after your "awesome" year 5 years ago, and I think he'll do it again.

Lastly, your defense is hugely overrated. Check the last 8 games of the year and playoffs, and tell me how you did save for the turnovers. If you're a defense that can't line up and stop anyone, that's going to be the downfall, getting turnovers is important, but not when you're getting smacked in the mouth. Lovie Smith always looks clueless on the sidelines.

Most important of all, Bears fans are completely delusional. They aren't the "class" of anything except that extremely shitty division.
Permalink
IlliniEdVarsity
840 days ago
Score 2+-
You make some interesting poiints but many are invalid. First off, making an argument about two teams that competed five years ago is rediculous. The teasms are not the same. Last time I checked, McNabb has missed significant time 3 of the last 4 years. And that "terrific year" was a fluck and i siad it at the time. I was adamint about the fact that I wanted Juaron fired fter that season.

Now lets talk the over rated thing. Yes, the last five games of hte regular season we did not play well. However, you name me any team that can lose two probowlers up the middle such as Tommie Harris and Mike Brown and not take a serious hit. We had many injuires in the secondary and on our tackle position. And we still managed to be one of hte best defenses. Now, if you are allowed to assume that McNabb will be healthy, I should be allowed to assume that both Brown and Harris will be and my scenario is more likely to happen in all honesty. We have greater depth as a team and we have one more year together playing as a team. So that argument is a bad one.

Now your first point. Yes, Grossman is a little shaky. His mechanics have in proved and outside of the fumbles in the last game, he has had a solid pre season. He is one year older and as a result one year wiser. To say that he is not a winner is preposterous though. He won in high school, he won in college and he has won as a starter in the pros. Tell me how that is not a winner? He got them to the super bowl in his first year starting. He made key throws when it mattered despite his many short comings at times. Yes, we are in a bad confereence, but you know what, so is every other team in that conference. We have gotten stronger on Offense with the addition of Hester and Greg Olson. Losing Jones is a bad thing, but I do believe that Bensen will more then make up for it. He is a solid back who reminds me a lot of Rickey Williams. And who exactly in this conference got better? Not really anyone from what I can tell. NO made some moves, but not enough to make much of a differnece. I wouldnt be suprised to see the Saints actually take a step back and be 8 and 8 this year. I still believe that the bears are the peak and everyone is looking up. I will admit I am biased. But I am removing tha from the equation as best as I can and am looking at hte facts and not trying to nit pick the flaws. We are not perfect, but we are still better then everyone else in the conference.

Any other questions I will be more then willing to adress.
Permalink
SuckatsportsVarsity
840 days ago
Score 1+-
You lost Tommie Harris last year, but you lost Tank Johnson this year.

The loss of Mike Brown and Tommie Harris was quite a blow to the defense, and I really feel that was the difference. Since then, the numbers and product of the defense fell dramatically, even though the wins kept on coming.

Here's the thing: I really don't trust Grossman. I don't like him, and I never will - I don't think he's a legitimate starter in the NFL. His wins are completely overblown, as are the wins of one Ben Roethlisberger (although, I feel he's more suited). I don't think he's gotten any better, and watching the games in the pre-season, it seems like he's completely content in being where he's at. They won in spite of him last year, and while it's a no doubter that he can "lead" a team into the playoffs, there's absolutely no reason that kind of thing shouldn't come back and bite him in the playoffs. In fact, the problems could be seen against the Seahaws which were not very good last year.

I'm not sure the addition of one tight end is going to be the offensive jolt the team needs, and Hester was there last year. You're going to see people zero in on him more, and those touchdowns on kickoffs will be few and far in between.

Also, even though Lovie Smith led the team to a Superbowl, I'm as unsold on him as I am on Grossman - and the two may be forever linked to me. This is a guy who is clearly terrible on gameday. He made no adjustments in any of the games that were team related. I don't trust him to make the required adjustments for his team to win, if they are not clearly better on both sides of the ball.
Permalink
IlliniEdVarsity
840 days ago
Score 2+-
I cant argue with some of your points. Some I can though. Yes we lost Tommie last year, and for a stretch Tank also. And yes tank is gone this year also, but he was replaced with Darvis Walker who is a better fit and a better D-tackle then Tank was. I wish Tank the best, but we will be fine with out him.

If you dont like Grossman, there is nothing I can do to change your mind. He has made strides this preseason. But he hasnt been great. Granted he wasnt great last year either in preseason. But out of hte gate he was amazing. He does have a gunslinger attitude, but so does brett Favre and he is hte patron saint of football depending on who you talk too. I am not asking him to be great all the time. If he can get to the point where he is conssitant and good we will have a scarey dangerous team. That might be a lot to ask, and I admit that I am drinking hte koolaid, but I think he can get to consistant.

WE play in a conference where there are a lot of teams that run the cover two. The biggest weapon to the cover 2 is a TE that can get down field. And if you talk to any of hte great QBs, they all have had a very good TE as a safty valve. Jay Novachek, and I am drawing a blank on the guy from SF. Anyway, that will provide more options and mismatches for our offense. And yes we had Hester on our team last year, but he was a DB and he has been moved into an Offensive role in order to give him more oppurtunities to make plays. Even as a decoy he will make LBs move up biting on fake end arounds. It will create space for hte others.

I agree with the assessment that Lovie was out coached in the super bowl. However, Tony Dungy is not exactly reknown for his ability to coach either. He is a players guy that everyone loves and would give everything they can in order not to disappoint him. And some of the adjustment issues can be blamed on the coordinators. Nota big Turner fan but lets see what he can do. And also people, this is hte first year that Grossman has been in the same offensive scheme and been healthy for the entire year.

You can have your doubts, but I think you are short changing the Bears a bit. yes, it is a week conference, but I think the bears by far have the least amount of chinks in their armor compared to many of hte other teams out there.
Permalink
SuckatsportsVarsity
840 days ago
Score 1+-
I think Hester will do well to move to the offensive side of the ball, players with his type of skills usually go to that side because they are playmakers there.

I'll say this much, a TE is a great weapon to have for a savvy QB. However, you also need a savvy tight end. I think we're jumping the gun on Olsen, who was only marginally good in college, to make an immediate and large impact in the pros as a rookie. Also, the need for a savvy QB is needed - I'm not sure that anyone would apply that label to Rex Grossman.

They have roped him in a little the last couple of years, but you could see at crucial times him almost always making the bad mistake. I wouldn't say that he improved in the off season. I watched the pre season games, and I didn't see anything that told me he did throwing drills or mechanics drills. He couldn't even get the snap sometimes.

I've watched him closely over last year to see what was actually wrong with him, and it boggles me that they haven't fixed this yet, as it is the biggest no-no ever. He continually throws off his back foot, whether he has pressure on him or not. Also, he likes to shotput, and push the ball, instead of throwing it. He'll continue to have issues throwing the ball because of his mechanics - and I'm no Sean Salisbury.

I see the comparison between him and Favre, except that his arm strength is much lower, but he thinks it's not. He only knows one way to play - the way he played in Florida. His players were so much better there, that it didn't matter. In the pro's though, he hasn't adjusted his game. I'll tell you, I'd be far higher on the Bears if they were to get a QB that can manage the offense instead of implode it. No one flashy, but no one erratic either.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
840 days ago
Score 1+-
Anyone remember, when the bears were just crushing teams and Grossman was on fire...i do...

I have a feeling Grossman will throw less TD passes...but only because Lovie isn't going to put him in situations where he needs to do a lot...he's a pretty ideal candidate for west coast offense or extreme management style QB playing...like a trent dilfer...

If you're going to cite a reason why the bears won't be as good, talk about your disbelief in Cedric Benson as a feature back. to me, he needs to perform well for this team to get back to the promised land.

The saints defense is awful and that was their weakness...did they improve it...because other teams (the eagles) made moves to fix those issues (Ian Scott, Bunkley, Takeo Spikes)...

Obviously, I'm a homer...but here's my theory...Do you think its easier for the Eagles to score on the bears on the bears to score on the eagles...I think the Eagles have a better shot of scoring on a tough bears defense than the bears do on a good eagles defense...

Plus...from a football standpoint, I think a lot of people would perfer a smashmouth style game between the Eagles and Bears than the saints...and...well...anyone...

Could be worse...could be atlanta...
Permalink | Reply
SuckatsportsVarsity
840 days ago
Score 1+-
I actually believe the Bears will lose to the Eagles in the playoffs, just like they did 5 years ago, or whenever that was. I decided to take a shot on New Orleans, because, well, just like pre-season polls, this means nothing. I agree 100% on Cedric Benson - see above. I think we were writing that at the same time.
Permalink
InsanMajor Leaguer
840 days ago
Score 1+-
You went with a potential #1 vs #1? Rather an anti-climax to the rest of your predictions. Gotta give you credit for not going Pats for the championship though.
Permalink | Reply
SuckatsportsVarsity
840 days ago
Score 1+-
Have to be honest, it was very hard not to. Still in the back of my mind, If eel they'll win.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Your_very_late_NFL_Season_Preview:_Playoffs"

This page was last modified 18:51, 23 August 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise