armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Why should Drexel get an at-large bid

10
Vote

by user Ncaahoopstoday

The NCAA selection committee has stressed year over year the value of playing road/neutral games and playing a challenging schedule. They went out of their way to encourage this by adjusting the RPI to give more weight to road wins.

And here is where Drexel is a poster-child for this. Aside from having one of the coolest nicknames and mascots (Dragons), they are 13-4 in road games this year. This is just road games, not road/neutral. In neutral games they are 1-1 (CAA conference tourney), although their loss was a semi-away game (played almost on VCU's campus).

However, some of the road wins were Big 5+ games, which are more semi-away than road games. Regardless those wins are "very nice" as Borat would say, three Big 5+ wins (Drexel being the "+" in Big 5 since they are not officially in the Big 5, but they play them anyways). The three Big 5+ wins: Villanova, Temple and St Joe. The only Big 5 team they lost to was Penn (they didn't play La Salle).

Other road wins of note: @Vermont, @Syracuse and @Creighton. Also "very nice". They split two overtime games with Hofstra (each winning on each others' home floor). They are 0-4 against ODU and VCU, but that's more of a reflection of how good ODU and VCU are. Why pick a team like Syracuse that sits at home and tries to eat 13 cupcakes (and can't even do that) instead of picking a team that actually played and won road/neutrals? (I'm not saying Syracuse shouldn't be in this year, I'm merely contrasting two extremes of scheduling practices).

Their 3-1 record in Big 5 games is also another indicator that this team would do well in a neutral tourney environment. ODU has a big win @Georgetown. Hofstra herself is not a bad team, but their record is not pretty enough for NCAA consideration (not that it helped them last year when they had a prettier record). On the plus side this will get Tom Pecora a more prominent role on CSTV's March Madness coverage. Why is that important? The CSTV karma! The CSTV karma got Seth Greenberg a great season this year after his stint as CSTV analyst! Also watch for CSTV karma rewards in the next two years for Gonzo (Seton Hall's Bobby Gonzalez) and Norm Roberts (St Johns).

Okay where am I? I think I was trying to make a point or two. Oooh the Drexel Dragons. If they don't get in, and some wishy-washy flaky BCS team with 1-2 road wins gets in instead of them, then the NCAA selection cmte should not be taken seriously...

Speaking of which, Billy Packer has promised that he will reveal some intriguing suggestion to the selection cmte on Selection Sunday, presumably when he and his caddy (Jim Nantz, fitting since he does a lot of golf tourneys) interview the selection cmte chair after the brackets are announced. Not sure if it will be groundbreaking suggestion or some silly pro-BCS silliness...

Okay back to the Drexel Dragons, from a TV ratings perspective, think of how many new fans will tune in to see the cool Dragon mascot! The UAB Blazers won't be there this year. But seriously, this is (as others have said) a litmus test of how serious the NCAA suits are about playing a tough/challenging road schedule and winning some of them.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DNLLegend
981 days ago
Score 1+-
The road record should get them in. Mid-majors have a tough time getting at large bids because they have a hard time scheduling tough opponents. Drexel took it upon themselves to go elsewhere to play the rough games, and survived.
Permalink | Reply
NcaahoopstodayLittle Leaguer
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Exactly! They did exactly what the selection cmte asked them to do. And if there was any doubt, the Bracket Buster win @Creighton should have sealed the deal!
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Drexel will get in but don't expect them to do much and pls, don't compare them to Cuse. Drexel and similar schools need to schedule tough road opponents, simply because they play their cupcakes in their conference. After all, Cuse SOS = 48, Drexel = 95.
Permalink | Reply
ChristofMVP
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Didn't Drexel beat 'Cuse at their house this year?
Permalink
NcaahoopstodayLittle Leaguer
981 days ago
Score 0+-
But Syracuse has control over their out of conference schedule, Drexel does not have control over their conference schedule. And I am picking on Syracuse because they are the poster child of 12+ home/in-state cupcake games per year. There are many other "BCS" schools that play much tougher out of conference schedules and they play tough in-conference schedules too. If you prefer compare Syracuses OOC schedule with other "BCS" schools with tough schedules. You can't hide 12 home-cooked cupcakes :-) It's Boeheim's right to design his schedule any way he wants, but he is not guaranteed a bid simply because he gets to 20 wins or has a winning record in a very unbalanced schedule-wise Big East. The numbers don't lie, KenPom's RPI numbers go back to 1999 and all the Syracuse cupcakes are right there, frozen in time.
Permalink
JoebookRed-Shirting
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Drexel? No. Bradley? No. Missouri State? No. All of us who are mid-major fans should prepare for disappointment.
Permalink | Reply
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
981 days ago
Score 1+-
I agree Drexel deserves a bid, much like ODU does. The CAA deserves to have three teams in, and Drexel's road record should be what gets them in. The only problem is the same problem we've had for years; middle of the road major conference programs. The committee always gives them the nod over us mids. Hopefully the success of all the mids last year, including George Mason, should persuade the committee to give more at-larges to mid-majors this year. Not saying Drexel or anyone else will go all the way to the Final Four, but no reason they can't make some noise. And yes, Mario the Dragon kicks ass.
Permalink | Reply
NcaahoopstodayLittle Leaguer
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah, especially if those middle of the road "bcs" programs did not actually challenge themselves. For example a few years ago Jim Harrick's last Georgia team had around 18 wins and played a very tough schedule and they were very good and they were a Final Four sleep. I have no problem with them getting in... But then you get to the "BCS" teams that play 10+ guaranteed home games, they steal a couple of conference road games in their unbalanced schedule "bcs" conference, and all of a sudden they say "20 wins, winning record in conference, we should be in!". For example Kansas State has a classic NIT team profile, they beat NIT teams, lost to NCAA teams, but because they have 10 Big 12 conference wins (9 games (out of 16) against Big 12 teams that may not be good enough for the NIT this year) some people (including Digger) are saying "IN! IN! IN!".
Permalink
ChristofMVP
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Can someone explain to me why Duke is a lock for the Dance? Anyone one else who finished .500 in conference play, with a 5-5 record in the last 10 (5-6 over the last 11), and losses to a lower seed in the 1st rd of their conference playoffs should not be going dancing.
Permalink | Reply
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
981 days ago
Score 0+-
Because it's Duke. Duke gets a pass for a lot of things, including, apparently, mediocrity. I don't think it's right, and I sure wouldn't give them a bid (especially after losing to NC State tonight), but they'll get one.
Permalink
NcaahoopstodayLittle Leaguer
981 days ago
Score 0+-
In-conference Duke *shockingly* only beat bubble teams (swept BC and Clemson, split with Georgia Tech, lost to Florida State). They are 0-6 against the ACC locks (NC, Maryland, Virginia Tech, Virginia). What saves them are wins over Indiana, Georgetown and Air Force, along with some good mid-majors (Davidson, Holy Cross, Zags). But even if they were in the NIT bubble, CBS would probably cancel their contract if Duke is not included. And they have the strong SOS/RPI as a blanket excuse for including them and giving them a good seed too.. Also it would be more fun if the Dirty Dookies lose in the first round of the NCAA, than not get invited at all :-))
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Why_should_Drexel_get_an_at-large_bid"

This page was last modified 23:20, 8 March 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Ncaahoopstoday | March 8, 2007 | March Madness Opinions | College Basketball | College Basketball Opinions | Ncaa Tournament Opinions

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise