armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Why does MLS insist on a Misplaced Calendar?

13
Vote

by user Kkfla737

While the rest of the world's FIFA sanctioned first divisions more or less stay on a consistent international calendar, MLS runs its season from March through November. Not only does this restrict MLS' ability to play in the international transfer market, it also leaves the MLS playoffs and MLS cup at the worst possible time in the year to get national media attention: in the middle of the NFL season, towards the tail end of the College Football's regular season, right after the World Series and as the NBA and NHL seasons begin.

This summer, MLS rejected offers for Sharlie Joseph to go the SPL Champions Celtic, Clint Dempsey, and Eddie Johnson. The reason was simple and valid: While European leagues were beginning their seasons and were beefing up their rosters for the campaign, MLS was ending its regular season and the sale of top players would be disruptive. The other international transfer window takes place in January: before the MLS season begins but in the middle of the European season. This mismatch of calendars has precluded Major League Soccer from acquiring top international talent who could bolster the leagues weak domestic and international standing, in addition to preventing top MLS players from moving abroad as a showcase for the league.

Major League Soccer complains about the loss of national team players from its league due to international commitments. Just last week, Carlos Ruiz missed two matches for FC Dallas while he was on national team duty. But why exactly was Ruiz called up for matches during this the home stretch of MLS' season? Because, it coincided with an international break in the majority of FIFA sanctioned domestic leagues. The EPL took two weeks off for international matches. So did LaLiga. So did Serie A. Yet MLS was deciding births in its postseason during this very period!

MLS has consistently prevented the US Men's National Team from competing in Copa America. MLS has stated that taking national team caliber players out of the league for two months every other year is a disruption to the league. While this is true, it again boils down to why MLS plays its season when it does.

Major League Soccer enjoys a national TV contract with ESPN and ABC. This contract calls for a certain number of broadcasts every season. Unfortunately, because College Football season begins in September, MLS actually has the vast majority of its nationally televised games aired BEFORE the playoff races heat up. In addition, casual MLS fans begin to tune out the league which serves as a summer filler in between the end of Football season and the beginning of the next football season once September roles around. Complicating this even further is the passion of hard core soccer fans here in the USA. While MLS satisfies soccer fans as filler material in between the end of European leagues in May and the restart of the season in August, Soccer fans, websites and TV programs begin to tune out MLS as soon as the EPL, La Liga, and other top international leagues begin play.

If MLS insists on playing its schedule at a different time than the rest of the world, they should make every effort to conclude the season before College Football and the NFL begin and before the fall transfer windown for international clubs closes at the end of August. In addition, MLS must build the breaks for international matches into its schedule the same way other leagues around the world do. The easiest solution would be for MLS to move to a season that runs from October to May, which would provide for the playoffs and MLS cup to take place and arguably the most fertile time period on the American sports calendar. In addition, the season would end at the same time as international leagues and the MLS would be able to partake in the transfer market and international club competetions.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
MikeBriggsVarsity
1139 days ago
Score 3+-
Great article. I admit that I started to tune out in September, though that was more from being annoyed at watching "my" team continue to tie and lose matches that didn't matter because they were already headed to the playoffs and likely to get the Supporters Shield (or whatever that is called). I tuned out the end of the regular season, and hope I remember to pay attention to the playoffs.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1139 days ago
Score 3+-
I agree with you 100%. If USA wants to be a force internationally, it needs to play its' football at the same time as everyone else (i.e. August to May). That way, there will always be the problem of domestic players missing the domestic game in, e.g. a World Cup.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1139 days ago
Score 3+-
USA needs to play international games. Playing in the Copa America would be a start. Playing qualis and friendlies would be a good way to continue. MLS is nowhere near the rest of the world because of the reasons you state. USA have a poor league, and the rest of the world have arguably better leagues. So the USA should imitate them. An example - we couldn't win the Ryder Cup, so we built The Belfry - a US Style course. Eventually, we won. If you can't beat them, imitate them.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1139 days ago
Score 2+-
I agree. US Soccer would be idiots to not accept the invitation. But then again, that's in line with their MO.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score -1+-
Do you reckon the A-League is better Alex??
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1139 days ago
Score 4+-
Just a few things to consider:


1. Most MLS teams rent their venues from football teams. These teams play on the weekends as well. More than one game is rarely played on the field on a weekend, and since it is an NFL team's (or in Salt Lake's case, the University of Utah's) field, they should have the best conditions, something they wouldn't have if MLS teams were playing on their fields every Saturday. This is not an applecart that will be tip over.
2. August to May is a very saturated time in the sports calendar: NFL, NBA, NHL, College Football, and College Basketball are all present. Summer offers only one other major sports league, Major League Baseball.

3. Because an MLS matches in New England, Colorado, and Salt Lake (sometimes even NY, Columbus, and Chicago for that matter) during the dead of winter is in violation of the Geneva Convention. We've got more extreme winters. This is no different than the Scandanavian, Russian or Ukrainian leagues who do the same thing.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1139 days ago
Score 2+-
March to mid-September would be ideal. Another thing they need to do is trim the playoffs. There should not be 2/3 of the league in the playoffs. This would help too.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 4+-
That's a joke! In England we play in the dead of winter (traditional games on Boxing Day, and New Year's Day, and in December and January). If USA signed this agreement, chances are we did too. So I don't see that as an argument! MLS should build their own stadia, as chances are they won't fill out a 75,000 seater NFL stadium. They should build their own 20-25k seater stadia, at which point they can run themselves, rather than renting a lease on an NFL (or college) stadium.
Permalink
MikeBriggsVarsity
1138 days ago
Score 3+-
D.C. United play in the same venue as the MLB Washington Nationals. Both are building new stadiums, but the construction is not yet over. Mid-March through Sept. conflicts with baseball, which matters in my particular case because I follow both the Nationals and United, though I understand the conflict that comes with a later schedule.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
Either way, there will be a schedule clash, so they may as well put it in line with the rest of the world.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score 0+-
March to mid-September would be ideal. Another thing they need to do is trim the playoffs. There should not be 2/3 of the league in the playoffs. This would help too. How many teams do you propose?
Permalink
JeevesJV Squad
1137 days ago
Score 0+-
Reply to Alex,

MLS clubs are slowly starting to get their own stadiums. Chicago just opened their own stadium in Bridgeview, the Home Depot Center opened a few years ago. I know Houston has a new stadium deal lined up and there's talks of the Red Bulls getting their own stadium.

Once a majority of teams have their own stadiums, I think it would be possible to move the season to a more logical time during the year.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score 0+-
I do agree with you that 2/3 is a little too much. I think the system they currently use is the best one top 4 from each conference. Having just the top 2 would be very stingy and having 3 would need a bye and would look ugly!!!
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
Why not just leave it as a League? Leave the playoff format to the US Open Cup, and have the League be a League and scrap divisions too?
Permalink
MikeBriggsVarsity
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
Not exactly sure what you mean exactly. The US Open Cup is a separate event that occurs during the season that is open to all Soccer (futbol) clubs, not just MLS teams.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score -1+-
Yeah I agree. Just have the 12 team league and have the top 6 teams enter the playoffs. They can use the same playoff format as the NFL.
Permalink
JeevesJV Squad
1137 days ago
Score 0+-
I would loooove to just have a league champion without playoffs, but Americans are geared to much toward the playoff format. Also with having so many teams included in the playoffs it prolongs the drama of the regular season. Unless we worked out a relegation system with the A-League or something a league champion format would hurt interest and attendence too much.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score 0+-
bah
Permalink | Reply
Kkfla737Soccer Kid
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
I have heard Garber and other MLS brass argue about the issue of sharing Football stadiums but if the league is playing until November aren't they playing during the season when scheduling conflicts occur? Also, Alex Holowczak's point about winter is dead on. In England they play through the dead of winter which is of course why the teams from the British Isles play a long ball style, to adapt to the climate.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1138 days ago
Score 3+-
Only thing is that the winters in England are milder and less snowy than in the U.S. Winter play would be no problem for Dallas, Houston, the LA teams, but major snowstorms are concerns for the Northeast, Midwest, and Rocky Mountain teams.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
They aren't that mild... As I type this I am shivering... Temperatures around Christmas/New Year are equivalent to that in Green Bay. Sure it doesn't snow as much, but the pitches are regularly frozen. Many matches without undersoil heating in lower divisions may get cancelled because of the weather.
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
It's not that cold right now. I was just looking at the current temp in Birmingham and it's just about the same right now as I'm experiencing. And Green Bay gets to below 0 Celsius on average during December. England has the gulf stream keeping it more mild during the winters. Green Bay has a Great Lake bringing snow in.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
Fair enough, but the bit in Birmingham where I live is smack on top of a big hill. I think it's cold! The Gulf Stream tends to go AWOL by December, the salt has gone by then. Hence our winter is after Christmas really (Dec 22 to Mar 21). I am prepared to back down on my Green Bay comparison! But it is still cold enough to cause problems potentially, if not for players for the fans. Yet they turn out.
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1138 days ago
Score 4+-
I don't think it would work here though because these teams do not have the same level of local commitment from fans. England's most successful teams have been in the communities for more than a century. To get a sports fan to an outdoor event in December or January requires a hardcore person. The NFL can do it because many of these teams are major parts of the community. The Packers are owned by the city of Green Bay, so obviously they qualify. And as a Philadelphia Eagles fan, I can easily tell you that the city revolves around the Eagles. I mean, people do Eagles chants at Phillies games in July! However, MLS does not have this, so I believe games would become even more sparsly attended than they are now.
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
The league concept will not work here. This season would have been kind of boring since DC United practically clinched in July. Sure, it became close at the end, but the middle would have lacked excited. Also, one of the reasons European football can get away with the structure is that UEFA competitions give incentives for other teams. While Chelsea clinched the Premiership last year with weeks to spare, Man U and Liverpool were gunning for the Group Stage of Champions League, Spurs and Arsenal were battling for the last spot in Champions League, and the teams at the bottom have relegation to fight. We will never have relegation, and CONCACAF play is currently a joke, so a playoff format is alright with me. However, I would like it to be the top 4 teams out of a single table. Next year would be the ideal time to implement, with Toronto making 13 teams and unbalancing the schedule.
Permalink | Reply
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score -1+-
4/13 is pretty stingy, more so than NFL!!!
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1138 days ago
Score 3+-
I'm partial to more stingy than too wide open, which is the problem now. I would like the MLS Cup winner to be a really strong team, not just one that snuck into the playoffs on a hotstreak. Plus I'm also for trimming the backend of the season, which this does. 6 team playoffs do not reduce the number of rounds played.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
I would have the winner of each division making the Final. That way it is elitist, and is like the rest of the world in some respects. It is the East v West champion. That way it could work. 4 would work, as long as the Final 4 are divisional playoffs, i.e. East 1 at home to East 2 and West 1 at home to West 2.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
There's no doubt that MLS and the popularity of soccer in general needs improvement for the sport to grow in the country.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 2+-
In Europe a League system can work because fans like to watch their teams. If a team is failing there is the excitement/pressure of relegation which exists. So fans turn out. With no relegation a la in US Sports, if a team fails, the attitude appears to be, oh well - try again next year.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score -1+-
Nah they should have half the teams in the playoffs like in in the A-League. The A-League works as the top 4 of the league's 8 teams enter the finals. The 1st and 2nd play a qualifying final (i.e. winner advances straight to final, loser gets a second chance) whilst 3rd and 4th play an elimination final.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
I think the main problem is just the relatively low popularity of the sport in the United States. There's no doubt that soccer is a not a very popular sport there and without national unity in supporting the game the game cannot be successful there.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
How do you take half of 13, Pnatt!?
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score -1+-
you can't
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1138 days ago
Score 1+-
He means 6 teams.
Permalink
PnattRed-Shirting
1138 days ago
Score -1+-
yeah as much as I hate to say you'd have to stick with 6 out of 13 teams!!!
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Why_does_MLS_insist_on_a_Misplaced_Calendar%3F"

This page was last modified 18:51, 12 December 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise