armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Why US Soccer Doesn't Suck

16
Vote

by Ibearg

Some people don’t respect US soccer, some think it quite frankly sucks. I feel this is ridiculous and I’m going to try to list some reasons why US soccer doesn’t suck. This article is not to argue that US soccer is a powerhouse like Brazil or Argentina, but simply to say US soccer deserves respect. If I say we or us you'll have to excuse me it’s because I’m an American and they are my team.

1) We own Mexico - We’ve won the last two gold cups beating everyone’s favorite North American soccer team, Mexico, to win it. Yes the Gold Cup has been in the US, but there are almost as many Mexicans in the US as Mexico (exaggeration) so I don’t know that you could really call it homefield advantage. We simply don’t lose to Mexico, except maybe at the Azteca, but I would suspect not too many teams do too well there; hard to play a mile above sea level and having things thrown at you all game. (Not speaking Spanish made finding Mexico’s record at the Azteca hard to find) At home or on a neutral field we own them. We consistently beat them in world cup qualifiers and we beat them in the 2002 world cup knocking them out. They basically fired their coach because he couldn’t beat us in any meaningful games… their new coach hasn’t either.

2) We consistently qualify for the world cup- this doesn’t say a whole lot since there aren’t a whole lot of great teams in CONCACAF, but nonetheless it is not meaningless. It means we are the best team on the continent… there are only 7 in the world. We win the games we need to, to get where we want to go… the world cup.

3) Players- We have talented players. No we don’t have Kaka or Ronaldinho, or a player as talented as Cristiano Ronaldo, but we have talent. Let’s start at the back, I don’t think there are many better goalkeepers than Friedal or Keller, and I think Tim Howard is becoming one of the better keepers in the world. At the very least I don’t think he gives the other team goals, like say Jens Lehmann http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFs1nqErUjY DeMarcus Beasley after having looked extremely dangerous in champions league matches for PSV was never really given a chance there, he eventually found a home starting for Rangers who sit atop the Scottish tables.

Brian Mcbride scored double digits for an awful Fulham team last year. I can’t imagine it was through the talents of his teammates he scored all those goals. Clint Dempsey scored the biggest goal all season for them last year to help them avoid relegation. This year he has 2 goals and an assist in 2 starts and 3 substitutions. Despite playing for a bad team he will no doubt have a solid season. Landon Donovan despite his lack of desire to play in Europe is a consistent top scorer for his teams and has won multiple MLS cups, with both San Jose and LA. The talent pool is also growing as Freddy Adu and Josy Altidore as well as others showed in the U-20’s world cup.

4) The 2006 world cup was the fluke- Some might say that 2002 was the fluke; that beating Mexico who we always beat, tieing Korea who is not all that good and beating Portugal were all flukes. However I would say 2006 was the fluke. Despite having been clearly the better team the US was not given the 8 th number one slot which was instead given to Mexico. Because of this Mexico got to face Angola, Portugal and Iran, or essentially Portugal. The US meanwhile had to face Italy, The Czech Republic and Ghana. Italy won the whole thing, and the US tied them. The Czechs had a disappointing performance overall and still killed the US team, however it was in the only match they played with their top players, including their top striker Koller who scored the Czechs first goal, and did not play after that. Even the Ghana team was a quality opponent.

Despite the tremendous odds they faced just to get out of the group stage, I have little doubt if they were not so poorly coached they would have advanced. Arena after having been a “maverick” in 2002 and starting a bunch of youngsters like Donovan and Beasley decided he had to be a genius again. So he played Beasley and Donovan out of position, and left Dempsey out of the squad till the final game, despite the fact Dempsey had clearly proven he should be starting. These among other awful coaching moves doomed the US team. How can I say I have such little doubt they would have advanced? Well in the final game who scored the US’ goal? None other than Beasley in his proper leftsided position passing it off to Dempsey for the finish. If they didn’t advanced they would have at least had a much better showing.

Yes they did poorly in 1998, but had a good showing in 1994 and having only been getting stronger since. Despite what you might think of Wynalda as an announcer he tells it like it is, and he’d tell you US team is much better and deeper now then it has ever been

5) Their recent record isn’t too much worse than other top teams- look at the records of other teams in the last two world cups. Spain for instance, knocked out in the 1 st knockout round in 2006 after making it out of an awful group. In 2002 they won a penalty shootout with Ireland (not exactly a world power) and then lost to Korea in the ¼ finals also on PK’s. This is the same Korea team, playing at home, which the US also played to a tie. Argentina unquestionably one of the world soccer powers didn’t even make it out of the group stages in 2002. I’m not arguing Spain and Argentina don’t have better players, or aren’t better teams but at least the last two world cups their records haven’t been any more impressive than the US.

Yes the US has struggled lately; they’ve even lost 4 in a row, including getting destroyed at the Copa America. However, Copa America was the Americans 3 rd string team against some of the best teams in the world. Is the US as good as Brazil, Argentina or England? No, no, and no, but that doesn’t mean the US team isn’t good or that it doesn’t deserve respect.

So good luck to the team against Brazil because even though we don’t suck, Brazil is reallllly good.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
820 days ago
Score 1+-
US is a Top 20 team in soccer. But that is about it.
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
820 days ago
Score 0+-
What the? A for effort, but Mexico hasn't exactly flourished in World Cups either. They are not a powerhouse team, they've never even made it to a WC Semi-final.

2006 was a fluke? HUH??! You can't magically be good after not making it to a WC from 1954-1986. That statement also goes along with the US consistently qualifying for the WC.

Also, of course we're going to make it. Who thinks Cuba would beat us in soccer?

Keller sucks, but Friedel is one of the best in the prem.

"Landon Donovan despite his lack of desire to play in Europe is a consistent top scorer for his teams and has won multiple MLS cups, with both San Jose and LA."

BUT THAT's THE MLS!!! What happens when he faces real competition? He acts like a little 6 year old kid.

Also, we flame out as soon as we start playing road games. Point in hand, Sweden.
Permalink | Reply
LASportsblogAAA-er
820 days ago
Score 0+-
Not that I disagree with you but you sound like Howard Rogers and Steven Cohen have been in your ear lol, but it's not like you can't see what's happening out there with your own two eyes, other's need their Sam's Army Oakley's lifted from their eyes.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
820 days ago
Score 0+-
CONCACEF really only covers 1 continent. US Soccer is not sucky when compared to other soccer teams, it's not world class, but it's decent. However, US Soccer sucks compared to other national teams. Our other national teams have a shot at winning gold medals and global competitions, US Soccer doesn't.
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
820 days ago
Score 0+-
The U-20 has a bright future IMO. Plus, they're too home dependent. They always want the Gold Cup hosted here.
Permalink
IbeargRed-Shirting
819 days ago
Score -1+-
I'm pretty sure CONCACAF stand for Confederation of North, Central American and Caribbean Association Football. North and Central America would be 2 different continents no?
Permalink
IbeargRed-Shirting
819 days ago
Score -1+-
damn they're not... i'm an idiot
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
819 days ago
Score 0+-
Well there are 3 South American teams in CONCACAF, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
820 days ago
Score 0+-
How can you put among and 2 together?
Permalink | Reply
LASportsblogAAA-er
820 days ago
Score 0+-
okay, your heart is in the right place and you got passion which I don't wanna discourage so I'm going to go through your article in detail so we can get the kinks knocked out:

1. The arguement on if we Own Mexico or not is pretty grey. We know they can't win in the US cause they are cyked out, and the US can't win at Azteca, but how about in Guadlajara or Monterrey or somewhere like that? It's a pointless discussion until either the US wins at Azteca or Mexico decides to play somewhere else in Mexico we can only say that we Own Mexico at home. You can't say the US owns Mexico on neutral turf because they've only played one match and one match doesn't make a series.

2.We have recently qualified for the world cup on a consistent basis, however 5 times in a row says a lot. No matter what you want to say about CONCACAF you can only play the teams that are put in front of you in these competitions and the US handles that competition consistently so valid point.

3. You get a pass on the players cause you got some perspective on the fact that we are growing and becoming a talented nation, but we don't produce the kinda players Italy, France and Portugal produce yet.

4. I'm sorry man, 2006 was not a fluke, it was worse then it even should of been but it wasn't a fluke. In 1990 the US went 3 and out with 0 points and 1 goal scored. In 1994 we hosted the Cup and barely advancded on a wonder strike by Wynalda, also no team to ever host the Cup as been eliminated in Group play (expect South Africa to break that.... but many people thought the same about USA in 94 so who knows.) In 98 we went 3 and out with 0 points and 1 goal scored and in 2006 we got 1 point from the group stage and scored 1 goal, if it wasn't for an own goal we wouldn't even have a point. All the evidence points to 2002 being the fluke so sorry man your just plain wrong on this one.

Other then that you seem to got it nailed, we don't suck, we are a 10-20 in the world I would say about 14-16 to be specific. I'm happy when that and the development we are making, it is an exciting time to be in this US Player Pool.
Permalink | Reply
Dcsundevil2002Div-I Stud
819 days ago
Score 0+-
I understand what you are trying to say and I agree with you. The USA is not in the same type of level as Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, Italy or Holland. When the USA puts its best players out there, we can hold our own against anyone. I think that if we qualify for the 2010 World Cup (which I am sure we will) assuming that Bradley is still the coach, he won't do the same thing that Arena did in Germany. He will bring the best players in their positions, and not try and bring guys who he feels still have it.
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
819 days ago
Score 0+-
Also, there is a lot of discouragement not to play soccer because of the Big 3 in the US. We have athletes that would prefer to be basketball, baseball, football, even LaCrosse players. Not a lot of people don't like soccer.

A lot of people have pointed out that they don't have the skills that Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, etc. do, but we can still do good against teams in the Americas. In the under 20 leagues, didn't US beat Brazil? That says that the US DOES have talent, but they don't get any recognition.

I'm not judging the US on just one game against a team that's well-known for soccer, I'm just saying that the US isn't recognized.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Why_US_Soccer_Doesn%27t_Suck"

This page was last modified 15:14, 5 September 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise