Why Trade Santana?!?!
| 20
|
by Behbigben15
A little while ago, I was on ESPN's Sportsnation.com (not sure why), and today's featured question was: Should the Twins trade Johan Santana. And, after I voted what I thought was the obvious "no" answer, the results showed that 65% said "Yes", and only 35% said "No". Why is that??? Am I missing something here? Why trade away your franchise player (with Hunter gone), especially when your best pitcher in the rotation is Francisco Liriano, without Santana. Liriano was great when he was healthy as a rookie in '06 (12-3, 144 K's, 2.16 ERA, 1.00 WHIP, in 121.0 IP). Liriano may not be up to his potential early on in '08, since he missed the entire season this year. Other than Liriano, the Twins rotation consists of Boof Bonser, Matt Garza, and Scott Baker. Last year, the Twins team ERA was 4.15, and that was with Santana, take him away, and you've got no pitching (in the rotation, anyway).
Santana's Stats:
2007- 33 Games, 219.0 IP, 15-13, 3.33 ERA, 1.07 WHIP
Perhaps it's for the cap room, or maybe the Twins are looking to attract a few big names in a blockbuster trade. Whatever it is, I don't agree with it. But, then again, I am not what you would call a "Baseball expert", I prefer American Football (NFL, NCAA) over Baseball. So, could someone, perhaps Niteowl, or Romi (or whoever wants to), explain to me why this would be a good deal for Minnesota, and who the Twins are going after in this potential trade?
