Why The NL needs the DH or the AL needs to drop It
| 6
|
by Trizz
It's an NFL game and the Patriots have just forced a 3 and out and the um lets use Jets are punting and Tom Brady is back to recieve the kick. What??? Yes, Tom Brady is back to recieve the kick that sounds just as dumb as Now Batting: Daisuke Matsuzaka. What if Dice-K gets HBP and is no longer able to throw or what if he gets hurt baserunning and I know I sound like a worried soccer mom right now but the point is that there oughta be balance in the AL and NL. You either gotta add a DH to the NL or take it away for the AL its just not fair.
The Rockies get an unfair advantage when the Sox have to choose amongst their best players and not only that they have a bottom of the lineup that includes Julio Lugo the bunter and a pitcher that can't do anything but bunt. That's automatic outs and rally killers. On the contrary, the AL gives the NL an advatage not only can their pitcher rest after each outing but they can add another hitter to the mix. Imagine if the Giants didnt have to have Barry Bonds in the outfield, and he could play everyday without sacrificing defense. When the NL goes to play the AL its alot easier to insert the best backup at the DH than for the AL to switch their best players.
What happens in a situation where a hit is needed and you have to pinch hit for the pitcher, the pitcher been very good on the mound so if you sub him you lose defense. Another unfair advantage that you don't see when the NL plays the AL, they could put their pitcher in as the DH if they wanted too and it wouldn't make much of a difference. The inbalance is ridiculous, the NL wants to talk smack and say that the AL is inferior because they have a DH, the AL whose DH's for the most part are the most popular players simply because they can hit which is why they are DH say that you are taking out the heart of lineup when you eliminate the DH. Kevin Youkilis had an all star season negated because the NL rules made David Ortiz the 1B.
If the MLB wants closer series and interleague play step one is too balance out the leagues. There are good pitchers that prefer AL teams because they don't have to hit and good hitters that prefer the AL because they don't have to field. You can blame high payrolls but the fact of the matter is, Barry Bonds would've hit 756 alot sooner as a DH, Alfonso Soriano would still be with the Nationals if he got to play DH (remember the whole outfield controversy). From reading, it's obvious which change I prefer but if the AL were to lose the DH, it would at least enable them to keep the same roster from series to series.
Lemme know how you feel about this.
