armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Why Matts AFC North Prediction Was Wrong

15
Vote

by Dukeboy999

Matts Season Prediction for the Browns:

"I want the Browns to be the surprise team of the league. They made giant strides on Defense, and now have a solid O-Line. They have a RB that has produced in the past and WR that can catch. They have a TE that could make the jump to superstar and the drafting of Joe Thomas AND Brady Quinn should help this squad break their recent record of feebleness.

Their defense will be their Achilles Heel this season. It is made up of mostly no-namers. The players that ARE known are OLD. Ted Washington at Nose tackle…2 of the starting 4 LB are 2nd year players and their safeties have a combined 7 years of experience.

They have a tough road ahead, but if they can click, they can turn some heads.

2006 Record: 4-12 2007 Prediction: 6-10 4th in the AFC North "

Reality : Matt starts off by saying that the  Browns have made huge strides on defense. Later in the article he states that the defense will be the Achilles heel. Im pretty sure the second prediction is a bit more accurate. Lets be honest about the Browns. They don't have a quarterback ready to start, and Brady Quinn is more a plan for the future. In terms of being solid, the O Line is nowhere near solid. Joe Thomas is a nice addition, but without LeCharles Bentley for at least 6 weeks, the rest is average at best. AND Thomas is just a rookie. Jamal Lewis is past his prime and old, and as for Braylon Edwards, he is alone in that recieving corps. Kellen Winslow is a nice player with huge potential, but still has not come close to fufilling that potential. The average football fan could not name one of the defensive starters. And don't Ted Washington is way past his prime. I just can't see multiple areas where this team is alot better than opening day last year.

2007 Prediction: 3-13 4th in the AFC North

Matts Steelers Prediction

"This team is so weird because, if you say they are good they will blow it; if you say they are bad they will surprise you.

Their offense needs some work. Their O-line is older and their WR are overrated. Hines Ward is a solid player, but he can’t be counted on as a number 1 anymore.  He needs some help and this won’t be Santonio Holmes breakout season. I do believe Big Ben will play better this season without the Superbowl Winner’s pressure on him, and Heath Miller is going to be special. I don’t trust Willie Parker yet. I don’t think he is the answer, but he could prove me wrong.

I always saw Joey Porter as the face of the defense and he is gone. They will not be a terrible defense, but I don’t think that they will be the powerhouse they will, and with the division they are in this will be tough.

I don’t think they will have a winning season unless new Head Coach Mike Tomlin can patch up the losses of Whisenhunt, Grimm and Cowher. That is quite a task.

2006 Record: 8-8 2007 Prediction: 7-9 3rd in the AFC North"

Reality: Before I even get started, we all know that Ben Roethlisberger had a horrible year last year, no matter what was going on off the field. I expect he will do better this year which makes a huge difference on the team. Matt is right about one thing, the O Line is probably the weak point of the team last year. Hopefully it can come together to be at least average or the team just might struggle. But saying that future Hall of Famer (Better stats than Swann and Stallworth) Hines Ward can't be counted on as a number 1 is somewhat off. The Steelers aren't the usual average offense. They don't need a star reciever to prosper. Hines Ward will have a solid season in the 1,000 yard neighborhood, and Santonio Holmes won't become a star but he will become a solid 2. Willie Parker is one of the top 5 backs in the league behind Tomlinson, Jackson, Addai, and Johnson. Timmons and Woodley are young, but Farrior is a stud and Haggans is solid. The one really bad point of Matts prediction is that he did not mention one of the two best defensive players in the league Troy Polamalu. (The other being Champ Bailey) And Whisenhunt, Grimm and Cowher combined are barely equal in value to Dick Labeau.

2007 Prediction 9-7 2nd in AFC North

 

Matts Ravens Prediction:

" This team is strange. It seems that they are always an “underdog” because people are used to a solid defense and an anemic offense. That has changed. This offense is dangerous with McNair at the helm, Heap at the TE position, Mason (one of McNair’s favorite targets) and the addition of McGahee. McGahee has something to prove, which is why, to me, this is the most underrated signing of the offseason.

The downside, though, is that the defense has gotten older and lost Adalius Thomas to New England. This may make more of a difference then you think. He was their most athletic and versatile defender.

I don’t see a huge drop off because of it, though. They are still a top 3 defense and their offense has gotten better. They are starting to meet in the middle.

They will have a couple tougher matchups this season but will still be the winners of this division.

2006 Record: 13-3 2007 Prediction: 11-5 1st in the AFC North"

Reality: Steve Mcnair is really old and Adalius Thomas is gone. Just saying those two things are reasons the Ravens won't win 13 games again this year. However McGahee is a nice addition, as Jamal Lewis was to old. The O Line is still very good and the recieving corps isn't bad. Even without Thomas the defense is still very good and Haloti Ngata is becoming one of the best D Linemen in the league. However old Ray Lewis is, he is still a very good player. Not to mention a slightly old but still very good secondary. This team will have a strong season, again winning the division. The Ravens and Steelers will be very alike in the fact they will both run the ball and rely on good defense, the Ravens will just be slightly better at it than Pittsburgh. The Division is average, and will be a pretty easy task for the Ravens.

2007 Record: 11-5 1st AFC North

 

Matts Bengals Prediction:

"On paper, this team should be the best in the division, but they have yet to live up to their potential. With a WR core like this, a Pro Bowl QB and a consistent RB, their offense will be in the top 5 for the foreseeable future.

Their defense, though. It is not that great. Their corners have a lot of talent but NOT a lot of consistency. They ranked 15 th in YPA/G, 8 th in RYA/G and 16 th in PYA/G in the AFC!  That won’t work. (30 th, 15 th, and 31 st in the NFL respectively)

If they can’t stop the other team, their offense will struggle. They have those WR in Johnson and “Who’s Your Momma” but with the loss of OG Eric Steinbach in free agency and no solid back up RB, this team WILL struggle when playing from behind.

Their schedule isn’t going to hurt terribly, but they will have to show that they are a tough team if they will have any chance of getting over the 8-8 hump. If they can do this, they will be in the hunt for the division.

2006 Record: 8-8 2007 Prediction: 10-6 2nd in the AFC North"

Reality: Matt says that this team will struggle when playing from behind. Well if that is the case then this team will struggle alot. I think most football fans would agree that this offense is one of the best in the league. But most would also agree that the defense is one of the worst in the league. It flat out has no strong points, although Leon Hall is a nice addition for the future. I just don't see a player on that side of the ball that can make a big play. The secondary has a little potential, but Wins come from production not potential. Again, this team hasn't really made any strides forward from last year. Steinbach is gone, as well as Henry for 8 games. The only way this team reaches 9 wins is if the offense puts up 50 a game.

2007 Prediction: 7-9 3rd AFC North

Summary: In the end, Matt has only a couple of major flaws in his thinking. One is he doesn't take into account just how bad the Bengals defense has gotten, and that no matter how good the offense is, it just won't make up for that. The other flaw being that there is no way the Browns finish the season within 1 win of the Steelers. The Browns are one of those teams whose most exciting day of the season is draft day. 5 wins will be a major victory for the Browns, with no legit option at quarterback. As for the Ravens, they will still be the class of the division, despite an aging roster. Finally, for the Steelers who were 8-8 last year with horrible play from Ben Roethlisberger. Porter and Hartings were losses, but both were aging, and along with the Patriots the Steelers are the best at knowing when to cut ties with old players. Timmons is a solid player, and Woodley will be a good starting linebacker by the end of the year. And having Troy Polamalu on defense is like having Peyton Manning on D. Unless Ben has another horrible year, the Steelers win at least 9.

 


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
816 days ago
Score 9+-
Wow...pretty pathetic that you have to attack someone else's article to create your own.

Question: you attack my Prediction on the Ravens...but then you pick the same record...how does that work?? Also, it is pretty obvious that you are a Steeler's fan: so, explain this to me...when was the last time ward had 1,000 yards? Right...2004...Plus he is 31 which in WR years is MUCH older then McNair's 34. Interesting...but I guess a 31 year old WR will be moe of a factor then a PROVEN QB. Also...Willie Parker will not be proven until he can not be second in the league in fumbles and fumbles lost. NO number one back should be up there. I won't argue with you on the Browns and the Bengals, because the Browns are an enigma and we both agree the Bengals D is porous.

Next time, try comign up with your own ideas before attacking someone else's.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm sorry, but counless knee surgeries and other injuries have certainly taken their toll on McNair. I wouldn't say Ward is older for his position than McNair. In football years McNair is far older than Ward, he was used and abused by the Titans. don't get me wrong, I have the utmost respect for McNair and I think he is one of the toughest guys I will ever get the pleasure to see, but the sun will set on his career before Wards. And I don't know where you get that Ward can't be counted on. If anything, that is what he brings to the table; reliability. Oh well, I don't really want to defend this article. I explained my disagreements by replying to your article instead.
Permalink
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 0+-
And I apopreciate that
Permalink
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 0+-
you heard that right: apopreciate
Permalink
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
816 days ago
Score 2+-
As I said in mine, I meant the Offense had made giant stride for the Browns...so I will say your examples are perfect for what i had mistakingly put: defense.
Permalink | Reply
Dukeboy999Varsity Captain
816 days ago
Score -2+-
Ok so you meant offense. Where have they made strides?
Permalink
Dukeboy999Varsity Captain
816 days ago
Score -3+-
First I said that some aspects were wrong, but I am agreeing with that one overall, as anyone can see I put the same record. And Umm I do have my own ideas. Hines Ward is proven. I am pretty sure that Ward has more rings than McNair. And I don't have trouble coming up with ideas for articles. I happen to have more than twice as many points as you have. Rookie
Permalink | Reply
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
816 days ago
Score 1+-
We aren't talking about rings, or the past...we are talking about this season...
Permalink
Tmil42AAA-er
815 days ago
Score 6+-
Rob Johnson has more rings than Dan Marino. Johnson must be the better quarterback.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
815 days ago
Score 1+-
Comment of the day Tmil...
Permalink
Tmil42AAA-er
815 days ago
Score 0+-
Thank you, sir.
Permalink
Dukeboy999Varsity Captain
816 days ago
Score -5+-
And this article was probably a bad idea because it has no chance to get a lot of votes. But as long as I prove you wrong it was worth it. I blame you. lol
Permalink | Reply
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
816 days ago
Score 6+-
And P.S. You can't prove ann opinion wrong.
Permalink
Dukeboy999Varsity Captain
816 days ago
Score -4+-
You are very right my cute little rookie. And as I said, this is nothing personal. It just shows that you have less football knowledge than you think. You are with the group of amatuer fans that think the Browns and Cardinals will be playing for championships soon.
Permalink
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
816 days ago
Score 3+-
Right...you obviosuly have never read ANY of my others because the Cardinals are trapped in a pit of mediocrity. And seriously...rookie? You have already called yourself out as being in college...i am at least 10 years your elder, and just because I haven't been posting on here doesn't mean sh*t. Just remember that. P.S. Duke Sucks. Welcome to reality
Permalink
Dukeboy999Varsity Captain
816 days ago
Score -6+-
Duke Sucks? Exactly how many national championships have they won? And just because you are my elder doesn't mean you know anything about football. My grandman is my elder but she doesn't know to much. And I haven't yet taken the time to read your others but will be sure to do so. Like I said nothing personal, you are a good writer on here. After all you racked up 21 votes on one article and my tops is 18.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
815 days ago
Score 7+-
"My grandman is my elder but she doesn't know to much." and...you're a jackass...
Permalink
Tmil42AAA-er
815 days ago
Score 1+-
I don't know, I think your comment right here should be comment of the day.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
815 days ago
Score 0+-
I wonder if she's knows how to type and/or knows anything about grammar?
Permalink
Tmil42AAA-er
815 days ago
Score 1+-
She probably taught him everything he knows.
Permalink
WizardmanRed-Shirting
815 days ago
Score 0+-
Wow, not only do you attack this guy's article, but his predictions sound far more dead-on than yours.
Permalink | Reply
Falcon02520Legend
815 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah the Ravens will only win 8 games. These are much better predictions that Matt? Wizardman, you are not stupid, come'on. The Ravens not having a winning record? You know better than that.
Permalink
Falcon02520Legend
815 days ago
Score 0+-
O, I read the prediction wrong because I cant tell where each team starts and stop, sorry.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
815 days ago
Score 1+-
Are they dead on becasue your a Cleveland fan? When is the last time any of your teams won a championship?
Permalink
Falcon02520Legend
815 days ago
Score 4+-
This article is horrible. It is an attack on another persons article, but that isn't why its bad.

The Bengals D is so bad their O can make up for any of it? Well, who won the Super Bowl last year? Thats right, and until the postseason they couldn't tackle me and I am 5'7 160.

Six wins is probally the ceiling for the Browns, but they won 4 last year, and they are deff a better team this year.

You predicted the same record as Matt for the Ravens. How is he wrong there?

And you spend your entire "reality section" talking about how much the Steelers don't have or lost. (including their head coach and coordinators). But you gave them two more wins. How does that work?

All in all, this read was retarded and a waist of my time.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
815 days ago
Score 4+-
Yes...

As far as the Bengels D, their offense can make up for it if they can run the ball effectively and/or control the ball with offense, therefore limiting the their defensive exposure and time of the field...

The colts did this successfully last year...and this is how dungy made such a staunch D
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
815 days ago
Score 0+-
in tampa
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 4+-
So basically, instead of writing this as a comment in his article, you created your own article? Why? When the rest of us have comments, we simply leave them as comments. Who knew the AFC North could stir such passions?
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 4+-
Oh, and most ridiculous statement of the day: "And having Troy Polamalu on defense is like having Peyton Manning on D."
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
815 days ago
Score 5+-
Why...imagine manning at safety flapping his arms and audibling all the time!
Permalink
Tmil42AAA-er
815 days ago
Score 5+-
Come on, don't you remember the year Polamalu returned 49 interceptions for touchdowns?
Permalink
Falcon02520Legend
815 days ago
Score 6+-
Peyton would make the slowest safety in league history.
Permalink
AfraidofedhochuliDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 5+-
But imagine him with the flowing Polamalu locks...hmmm...
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
815 days ago
Score 4+-
All of these are the comments of the day. Each one made me laugh out loud.
Permalink
Yakob878MVP
815 days ago
Score 3+-
ya this article really has had some of the funniest comments all togather that i have seen since i joined arm chair gm. Expecially JuTMSY4 good job
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
814 days ago
Score 1+-
1. A Wunderlic test here at the 'Chair could've prevented this tragedy. 2. Who the (blank) is Matts? Swedes are now writing here? (cool).
Permalink | Reply
Falcon02520Legend
814 days ago
Score 0+-
Tyrone, you might have just had the greatest idea ever for Armchair. A Wunderlic test needs to be put into place, at the least to earn the right to post stuff.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Why_Matts_AFC_North_Prediction_Was_Wrong"

This page was last modified 14:15, 6 September 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise