armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Why I like what we're doing to Michael Vick

6
Vote

by Darknastycash

Throughout the last few weeks/months, I have kept my ear to the grindstone and tried to make sense of both sides of the Michael Vick saga. Needless to say, there are a ton of factors that are incorporated in peoples arguments ranging from race to ethnicity and back to race. I think these arguments have some merit but do not broach the bigger issue at hand. Michael Vick is being publicly shamed and humiliated and I am loving it!

Whether he is black, white, blue, or green does not matter. What matters is how appalling his "alleged" crimes were and how he is being punished for it. I have heard many arguments made about how the financial penalties he is incurring and the jail time he is looking at are enough punishment, but I disagree. Those are auxiliary penalties that are results of a legal system and as far as I care can be dismissed. Ron's real punishment is the shame that we as a country have poured onto him like Pacman's 80K onto a stripper. We live in a country where in the past 15-20 years we have raised our kids into believing they are something special when in reality they are no better than kids were 50 years ago...... maybe even worse and more narcissistic.

This generation of children also coincided with the advent of the Superstar athlete that is not only seen on Sundays anymore but on a daily basis through the majesty of advertising and marketing. We've been watching these so-called superstars commit indiscretions ranging from murder (OJ, Carruth) to drug trafficking (Newton and....Newton again) and yet in the eyes of many the offenders are the real victims (ok, maybe not in the murder cases). Smaller crimes committed by active athletes are blown out of proportion for a week and when the dust settles these individuals see no reason to change their ways because a one game suspension and a 50K fine are no longer viewed as a big deal by todays athlete. When news broke about Michael Vick's dog fighting ring I figured it would be quickly handled with some community service and fines and ATL would see it's beloved #7 on the field in time for Week 1.

It turns out that people find animal abuse more offensive than most other violent crime and immediately sprang into action calling for Vick's head. In the weeks that followed, America displayed it's collective outrage through opinion pieces, news shows, talk shows, and of course the internet(s). It all culminated into a public shaming that would make Richard Nixon feel good about himself. The idea behind public shaming is so simple that I am amazed we ever got rid of it in the first place. In 20 years, nobody will remember Michael Vick the football player. His legacy (assuming he ever had one) has been tarnished forever and will not be recovered even if he comes back and wins 9 Super Bowls. He will always be known as Michael Vick the dog fighter and it will haunt him forever.

It is sad that there are athletes that were shamed for their on-field failures (Norwood, Lett, Buckner) while people like Ray Lewis are revered for his D but not chastised for his skills with a knife. Michael Vick has been shamed thoroughly and we are a better country for it. What's important now is that we keep it up and broaden our judgmental glares to include politicians, CEO's, and most importantly, hateful religious zealots that turn out to be gay.

Petty criminals do not deserve to be publicly shamed because their lives are sad enough, however, rich and powerful men that take advantage of their fellow man or rail against a lifestyle only to secretly subscribe to it themselves are the ones that need to be taken to task. So the next time a scandal like this breaks and it turns out for example that Bill Bidwell has been TRYING to win a Super Bowl all these years, I hope we will all be standing there pointing and laughing.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
Thanks for pointing out he Ray Lewis stabbing that somehow got swept under the rug. It pains me when I hear all the praise he gets. Fans tear into T.O. and Chad Johnson and then tell us how awsome Lewis is. T.O. and CJ both stay out of jail and keep their antics to the sports pages, not the front pages.
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
Not that I am a big Ray Lewis fan, but you are out of bounds here. No evidence was presented that Lewis did anything with a knife. Murder charges against him were dropped although he did plead guilty to obstruction of justice.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
I can agree that Lewis didn't actually do the stabbing, but those of us who can't afford Johnny Cochran would have been charged with murder or conspiracy or something severe, not obstruction of justice.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
He was charged with those things. The charges were dropped because they had no evidence.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
Ok...And the glove didn't fit either. He was there, he fled the scene, and then he lied to the cops. Like I said, I think Joe Shmoe with the public defender goes to jail, possibly for murder.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
A friend of mine when I was younger was involved in a murder. He was there, that was the extent of his involvement. After the shooting, he left the scene. The following day, he went to the police office himself and told the whole story. But since he didn't do it right away and the guy died he still had to spend 2 years in jail for some form of manslauter. Thats what happens to the average guy, not a plea for obstruction of justice.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
You can't honestly compare Ray Lewis to OJ Simpson. If your basic point is that those with wealth, power and influence get better legal representation than those without, you are going to find no argument here. However, I do find it objectionable to infer that Ray Lewis is a murderer when all charges against him were dropped becuase of a lack of credible evidence.
Permalink | Reply
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
And why not, because more people think O.J. did it than those who think Ray Lewis did it. There was murder. A human being died. Ray Lewis was most definately involved. Involved so much so, that in the long run he testified against the man that did the stabbing. Sounds alot more like a plea bargain than "all charges against him were dropped". Thats why the charges were reduced. Not due to lack of evidence, due to his willingness to testify against the killer. Don't surgar coat what happened.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
Sorry, but that is not what happened. After the prosecution presented their evidence, the defense made a motion to dismiss the indictment because no evidence was introduced against Ray Lewis. At that point, the prosecution offered a plea bargain. They would drop the murder charges against Lewis if he agreed to testify against the actual murderers. All of this suggests that while perhaps Lewis is "guilty" of being in the wrong place at the wrong time and making poor decisions afterwards, he is in no way guilty of murder. OJ, by the way, was found not guilty. All that means is that the prosecution did not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. He was found legally responsible for the murders in a civil trial where the standard is preponderance of the evidence. It is an entirely different situation then with Lewis where there was simply insufficient evidence presented to the jury implicating Lewis in the crime.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 0+-
I did say that he testified against the actuall murderer in a plea bargain didn't I? Are you actually trying tell me that when the defense asked for it to be dismissed they thought it would be better to be found guilty of obstruction. I don't get it. If there was no evidence, then the defense would have had the the case against lewis dismissed not reduced. Being present at a murder and not telling the authorities until after you are arrested is a crime. It can range from murder to far lesser crimes. But make no mistake about it. When it comes to murder "wrong place, wrong time" is not a valid defense in the eyes of the law. And correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't it Lewis' bodyguard that was convicted. All I am saying like I said before, is don't sugarcoat it. Innocent people don't make plea bargains.
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
837 days ago
Score 1+-
I think we are beating a dead horse here. TTYL.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Why_I_like_what_we%27re_doing_to_Michael_Vick"

This page was last modified 14:54, 6 September 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise