Why Does the NFL Always Need to Have "Nice Conditions" For the Super Bowl?
| 19
|
by SSreporters
Seriously, it makes no sense at all. San Diego, Miami, Glendale, all of the places in which it is drop dead gorgeous weather in February. Maybe the NFL needs variety. It doesn't have to be the same places over and over again, it gets monotonous. Have Denver host the Super Bowl, and have 2 teams play in -5 degree temperatures. Put it in Seattle, Chicago, Cleveland, it doesn't have to be either a dome or a stadium in a location in which the city has beautiful weather. We need diversity, the fans will show up, Miami had a great Super Bowl with Manning and everything IN THE RAIN!! What does that tell you?
These are grown men playing football, not little 7 year olds. They play in the snow, rain, wind, all of the freaking time! Why should the Super Bowl be put in like 5 cities? It would be incredible to see a Snow Bowl between San Diego and San Francisco, not "Perfect Conditions". There isn't such thing anyway.
It baffles me why these guys are treated like they're delicate. Wouldn't you want to see Peyton Manning frozen in Chicago?
I know there is no way I'll have more than 6 people agree with me, but don't you think the NFL should expand where the Super Bowl should be held, with the weather not being a factor?
| For the good of the 'chair, this user is a member of the IGNORE Pnatt Group. |
| This user believes that you are smarter than the average bear. |
