armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Who Paid For The Refurbished And Upgraded Louisiana Superdome?

76
Vote

by user FranklinNoble

While watching Monday Night Football telecast of the home opener for the New Orleans Saints last night, I couldn't help but notice how much better the Superdome looked.

Not just better than after Katrina hit – I mean better than it ever was. The field was brand new FieldTurf, and the interior of the bowl was illuminated with new color video boards and LED “ribbon” boards. Fresh paint and a new roof, along with color-cycling strobe lights outside, gave the building an appearance of almost complete newness.

In between the gushing over how the event was a victory for the city and a catalyst of regional rebirth, and the deluge of emotional sideline interviews with every celebrity who ever spent five minutes in New Orleans, there was a mention of the price tag. Something in the ballpark of $180 million. Most of it paid by FEMA.

And that set me off.

The majority of the population of the gulf coast region is still living in Houston or Baton Rouge or Atlanta or wherever, largely because FEMA hasn't gotten around to replacing or repairing anything but a handful of the homes and buildings and other critical infrastructure destroyed by Katrina... but the federal government is paying for stadium upgrades?

Less that 2% of the population of the United States lives within the New Orleans region. But we're all paying for the shiny new ballpark we saw on TV on Monday evening, well before any other substantial recovery has been made in the region. A building that seemingly serves to enrich a select few has been completely repaired and even upgraded, while the common man is still displaced (or lives in a FEMA trailer, if he's lucky).

Rather than listen to the opinion of a handful of sports commentators on the subject, I decided to to some research on the matter, and share my findings. Not surprisingly, very little of the media coverage surrounding this game did anything to expose the truth behind the stadium project, and I won't pretend to have all the answers here. Hopefully a more substantial media outlet will tackle this project (and if you find a story that does, please share a link).

The first questions that came to mind were pretty simple: What was the price tag? Who paid how much? What upgrades were included, and why? And my wife raised the best point: Shouldn't this have been covered by the building's insurance?

I found most of the answers to these questions (and you'll find links to my sources at the end of this article). Let's start with the ownership issue.

The Louisiana Superdome is owned by the State of Louisiana, and is privately managed by a group called SMG – a corporation based in Philadelphia that manages scores of sports venues worldwide. It falls under the authority of the Louisiana Stadium & Expedition District (LSED), which also controls the New Orleans Arena. The primary tenants of the Superdome are the New Orleans Saints, and Tulane University (a private institution). The dome is occupied 45-50 weekends out of the year, presumably by assorted conventions, concerts, and other varieties of entertainment.

The Superdome is covered under an insurance policy that the State of Louisiana has for all of its facilities. The problem is, the policy isn't large enough to cover the extent of the damage. The following sums it up pretty well:


Image:openquote.gif    
 

The $2.3 billion Louisiana estimate includes damages to state government buildings, universities, courthouses and other facilities. Of that, $500 million is covered by insurance, after a $25 million state deductible.

Blanco is seeking 100 percent FEMA reimbursement for the uninsured amount. But that is negotiable. The law requires that FEMA pay 75 percent, but the agency reimbursed 90 percent of California's costs after the Northridge quake, and covered 100 percent of New York's costs after Sept. 11, according to congressional reports.

The law says FEMA must only restore facilities to their previous quality...

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/27/AR2005102702046.html

 


So, basically, insurance is going to cover half a billion dollars worth of the total estimated 2.3 billion dollars in damage to state and government buildings. That answers the insurance question – the state simply didn't have a big enough policy. But what about the point that states “The law says FEMA must only restore facilities to their previous quality...”

Well, here's who footed the bill for the new and improved Superdome:

  • FEMA: $115 Million
  • State of Louisiana: $13 Million
  • NFL: $15 Million
  • LSED Bond: $41 Million

Total: $184 Million

So that works out to 62.5% being paid for by the federal government – less than the 75% required by law, but almost certainly more than just “previous quality.” The Superdome improvements include:


Image:openquote.gif    
 

Eye-catching technology updates are in place. New scoreboards, video boards and an LED ribbon board system have been installed. The end zones sport new 27-by-48-foot (8.2-by-15-meter) scoreboards. There will be four high-tech 8-by-44-foot (2.4-by-13-meter) scoreboards in the corners of each end zone, and four new 183-foot-long (56-meter-long) LED halo boards along the facade of the second level.

Fan comfort is emphasized. Club-level seats have been replaced with new leatherette seats. Fans will buy their beer and hot dogs from renovated concession stands. All 137 box suites were stripped down to the metal studs in the mold-removal process, then refurbished, although carpets, cabinets and countertops will not be installed until after the season. Plasma televisions have been installed in each.

Source: TaiwanNews.com

 


All this, in addition to the new and improved FieldTurf (which is a substantial upgrade over the old AstroTurf playing surface).

Nothing was done to improve the Superdome's capability as a storm shelter. It is estimated that those upgrades would cost an additional $30-$40 million.

What is unique to the Superdome (as opposed to most NFL stadiums), is that it is profitable to the state of Louisiana even without the presence of an NFL team – at least it was prior to the hurricane. In fact, the state is paying the Saints $180 million to stay where they're at, as team owner Tom Benson has repeatedly complained about the building, and has threatened to move. Benson can buy his way out of his lease for $81 million. Arguably, it might be more profitable for the state to let them go.

So what's happened here? Is the Superdome really that important to the NOLA region, or did the American taxpayer just get ripped off? In my opinion, it's a little of both, but more of the latter. The Saints have been unhappy tenants in the aging Superdome for years. The kind of improvements that they sought weren't going to fly with the taxpayers in Louisiana, because people generally hate subsidizing wealthy private business owners.

In fact, hurricane Katrina was the best thing that could have happened to the Saints. They were a pathetic team last season anyway, and the displacement caused by the natural disaster gave them a free pass. But more importantly, the consortium of government agencies and private corporations with an interest in the Saints and the Superdome were able to exploit the disaster to their own profit. By selling the dome recovery as a critical catalyst for economic recovery, and playing on the guilt of a federal government that simply could not do enough to relieve the disaster, they procured an enormous sum of money to pay for the upgraded stadium that they wanted all along.

We've all paid for it. I suppose that makes the Saints “America's Team” now.

(originally posted at: http://www.digitalstadium.org/smf/index.php?topic=365.0)

Sources

  • USA Today
  • Taiwan News
  • Washintgont Post
  • LSU Reveille



Date

Tue 09/26/06, 3:16 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DeuelioJV Squad
1163 days ago
Score 5+-
Well written good sir. Deserves a bigger audience somehow.
Permalink | Reply
Awrigh01All-Star
1163 days ago
Score 3+-
Thank you for bringing this to light.
Permalink | Reply
FranklinNobleSoccer Kid
1163 days ago
Score 2+-
Thanks for helping clean it up... I'm new to posting stuff here. :-)
Permalink | Reply
Awrigh01All-Star
1163 days ago
Score 1+-
its a group effort here . . . welcome to the site.
Permalink
The sharkDraft Pick
1163 days ago
Score 1+-
Great read. Nice work. Welcome to the site.
Permalink | Reply
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1163 days ago
Score 1+-
A well-written article that raises some valid arguments (and kudos on the research as well). I do believe, however, the dome's recovery is a critical catalyst for economic recovery. Given the cash cow that is the NFL, as well as the myriad of other events the Superdome plays host to, I would imagine in the pre-Katrina years the building was a huge economic boon for New Orleans.

In fact, I think a lot of the city's residents see that. One of the major themes I heard last night was, "Everything you know and love about New Orleans is fine; we need to get the tourists back, so the city's revenue can keep rising and the recovery can continue." Do I think all that FEMA money could've gone elsewhere...like, say, the displaced citizens? Yes, but I can honestly see last night's monumentous return as a step in the right direction. We underplay the societal impact sports has, and when that sport is professional football, we underestimate the financial impact as well.

I find it interesting none of the residents were bitter over the Superdome's renovations while other sections of the city remained in ruins. Either the media only chose to seek out that opinion (quite possible), or the residents realize how important the building is to the region (also very likely).

In no way am I disagreeing with this article; I appreciate how it brings us down to earth and keeps us from getting too carried away with last night, which was--in all honesty--an emotional and momentous occasion (I have no ties to New Orleans or the Saints, and I got goosebumps over it all). Is the return of the Saints to New Orleans and the re-opening of the Superdome a step in the right direction? Absolutely, and everyone who lived in the city should relish that beacon of normalcy.

But at the same time, we need to realize New Orleans is a long, long way from being what it was before the storm, and it does bear asking why so much money and so many resources were poured into this building when there are still so many without homes.

Excellent piece. Welcome aboard.
Permalink | Reply
FranklinNobleSoccer Kid
1163 days ago
Score 2+-
Well, I did acknowledge that the dome does indeed bring money into the region - in fact, it would do so without the football team. Still, not everybody is happy about the priority being given to the Saints down there - it's just being as widely reported.

I should confess - I've always taken exception with public subsidies for sports franchises. I live in the Sacramento region - wait until I go off on the measure for the new Kings arena that is due to hit the November ballot. :-)

I think the thing that bothered me was how they crammed in all the upgrades on the federal tab. I wouldn't have so much problem with FEMA helping to restore it to basic functionality, but lavish new luxury suites and expensive new video boards and ribbons aren't necessary for the general public to watch a sporting event or attend a convention.

Thanks for all the positive feedback. I only posted this here on a whim, after seeking a broader audience than what I was getting on my own website. The community contribution and involvement here is really refreshing.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
It would not help the city of New Orleans much to bring all the people back without an economic structure to support them. Fixing the Superdome and bringing the cash cows associated with it back to New Orleans provides jobs and income for the local residents. You said yourself that the Super Dome is a very profitable stadium. Furthermore the "upgrades" installed are not as frivelous as you imply. For instance noone would watch an NFL game in a stadium with a incandecent style High School scoreboard. Some of the equipment that you referred to as new may have been the same or similar to what was there before and are "new" because the old ones were damaged. Certainly money could have been trimmed from the renovation, but the money that was spent is money well spent because it will bolster the local economy and give an economic infrustructure for the city to stand on as recidents come back.
Permalink
I am a cpcpMajor Leaguer
1163 days ago
Score 1+-
Very well done, welcome to the site. I think you only hit a small portion of the problem here. The fact that they're not only paying that much to rebuild a football field, but to rebuild a city that remains a target for destruction at any point in time is not only a waste of money, but potentially a waste of more lives.
Permalink | Reply
Pack MentalityWaterboy
1162 days ago
Score 2+-
cpcp, I suspect that the ground where New Orleans stands would have had to be made part of the Gulf of Mexico by Katrina for not rebuilding to be a palatable option to most people. Given its cultural significance and historical importance to America (not to mention the American predilection for clinging tooth-and-nail to lost causes), it's no mystery to me that so few are willing to just pull the plug on New Orleans.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
But the Superdome is such a significant place in New Orleans. Now the people have something to symbolize hope, and not just a statistic that says that some percent of all homes damaged by katrina are being rebuilt, but something they can see and enjoy. As for why the stadium could be upgraded, as long as all of the FEMA money is spent on only restoring the stadium, or paying the value of the old equipment for the new items, technically they only paid for the stadium to be restored. The stadium was packed for the number of people that have returned to the city, and there was a huge celebration. It symbolizes the fact that while homes are being built, the city can come back to its cultural status. Everyone needs to think of what the Superdome means to them before critisizing them for rebuilding it "so early"
Permalink | Reply
JoshkrossDraft Pick
1162 days ago
Score 2+-
I'm sorry. This is no excuse. People's homes and the Levees to protect them are far more important than any symbol. It might be a nice gesture, but it is an imprudent and impractical one. Without people having somewhere to live, it's hard to have any "culture"
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
I live in New Orleans. The overwhelming majority of us have no problem with them spending $180 million on the Superdome. It's a symbol of the rebuilding process. Yes, you can look around and see people moving back in, but a symbol as large as the Superdome lets the whole nation know it is ok to come back.

On to your claim that even though FEMA is paying less than required, taxpayers are still getting ripped off: FEMA is required to get the dome back to previous quality, yet you complain about the improvements made...

Are you aware of how much carpetting had to be replaced? How many acres of the roof had to be replaced? These things arent cheap. And the large videoscreens were destroyed. Are we supposed to find vintage 1990 video sceeens for the sake of "previous quality"??? No. We're going to buy new ones. As for the field- we'd been having field turf, as the astroturf was replaced a few seasons ago. So the new field turf IS previous quality.

But I'm sure as you live in Sacramento, and have provided such hard, detailed facts, youre the best judge of what went on, and how important fixing the Superdome was. Right?
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #3
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
Lol
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
But they have no shot whatsoever of rebuilding everything before the next hurricane season. So if they rebuild places such as the superdome, theyhave a place at least to start as a shelter for any future hurricanes. As it has been said, the roof should last through another katrina. The people in New Orleans felt like everything was back to somewhat normal during that game, and they have a team that will stay in their city for at least a few more years
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
It would not help the city of New Orleans much to bring all the people back without an economic structure to support them. Fixing the Superdome and bringing the cash cows associated with it back to New Orleans provides jobs and income for the local residents. You said yourself that the Super Dome is a very profitable stadium. Furthermore the "upgrades" installed are not as frivelous as you imply. For instance noone would watch an NFL game in a stadium with a incandecent style High School scoreboard. Some of the equipment that you referred to as new may have been the same or similar to what was there before and are "new" because the old ones were damaged. Certainly money could have been trimmed from the renovation, but the money that was spent is money well spent because it will bolster the local economy and give an economic infrustructure for the city to stand on as recidents come back.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #4
1162 days ago
Score 2+-
Did anyone else hear the commentator on MNF saying how great it was that people that "still do not even have jobs" have committed to buying season tickets. How sick is that? I LOVE football, but I suspect my wife and kids would feel better if I was working before hooking us up with season tickets. Also, I found it very interesting that we could hear from Spike Lee and Harry Connick jr about what they are doing for NOLA, couldn't the NFL find even one LOCAL person who has made a difference? Oh, thats right, those people still don't have houses and probably couldn't afford to go to the game...
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #5
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
harry connick jr is from new orleans
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #4
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
You are correct, I should have said "non-celebrity". I certainly respect the work that he is doing, but I am also tired of seeing celebrities getting 99% of the credit. I am positive that there are some local non-famous people that have done some extrordinary things.. I wonder who they are?
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #6
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
Not to mention the state level insurance scam. Every Louisianian who actually pays their home's insurance this year gets to pay an additional surcharge to offset those the state's insurance shortfall.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #7
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
wow what a goverment. remeber after the war with hezbollah and isreal. hezbolla gave $12,000 to everyone that losts homes right after the war. not next week, im talkin about the next day. and they arent even a democracy? wow what a goverment.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #8
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
One minor correction, at least one upgrade was made to aid the Superdome's capacity as a shelter. The new roof is a category five rated roof. Large sections of the previous one blew off in the storm since it wasn't rated for a hurricane at all. The new one should stay on no matter what. Other than that, I don't know of any other such upgrades, but I could be wrong.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #9
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
Nice thought. One minor point. The SuperDome had a FieldTurf field installed before the hurriane hit. So a new FieldTurf field is simply bringing it back to what was there before.
Permalink | Reply
Pack MentalityWaterboy
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
cpcp, I suspect that the ground where New Orleans stands would have had to be made part of the Gulf of Mexico by Katrina for not rebuilding to be a palatable option to most people. Given its cultural significance and historical importance to America (not to mention the American predilection for clinging tooth-and-nail to lost causes), it's no mystery to me that so few are willing to just pull the plug on New Orleans.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #10
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
The spending of FEMA money did have limits. It was to be applied only to repairing things damaged by the storm to pre-storm levels. IE, the roof, repainting interior walls, replacing storm damaged chairs, concession stands etc. The lions share of that cost was the Dome's roof repair. The real shame of it is that roof was redone several years ago, and the state is pursuing the possibility that previous contractor may have done substandard work that allowed the water to leak in.

All the improvements that you saw were payed for by the NFL, the LSED and the state. For exmple, you'll notice that were not new seats throughout the stadium, as you might expect from a renovation, because noone could pay for that. Those that were deemed destroyed were replaced and the rest were sanitized.

A minor point about the turf. Immediately prior to the storm the Saints were playing on Nexturf, not Astroturf. Although the new turf is an improvement on the previous turf, the reason it wasn't replaced is because the company that makes it went out of business.

One other thing, you mentioned the lights outside the dome. That display was put in place that game only. The last the dome was done that way was when it hosted the superbowl following the 2001 season.
Permalink | Reply
CleoDaisy
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
Franklin, Anonymous #9 clarifies and answers the question you are begging. If you are looking for something with FEMA to set you off, look at their accounting the trailers most residents are still waiting for, the rental assistance promised to a few hundred thousand residents--that if you spend a week in NOLA and ask every single person you meet if they received that assistance you will really get "set off" on how many have been qualified for full assistance but have not received anything past the initial emergency $2,000. Oh, and let's not forget the Army Corps of Engineers; first everyone needs to know they are a private company that got paid by the government to build the levees (not just in LA). The devastation done in NOLA was hardly done by Katrina, but by the levees failing. Why did they fail? It turns out that the Corps of Engineers took shortcuts on materials, on nearly every spec in the designs for the levees. One such spec is the heights of the levees. They were designed to be 2-4 feet taller than the Corps built them. The government isn't pressing for their liability in the case of the 1,500+ deaths in New Orleans due to those levees breaking. THAT is infuriating! LIVES! Not money. LIVES! Families, friends, children, children's parents. So, instead of getting "set off" on FEMA spending the money on the Dome--LESS money than they were required to spend by law, and spreading your limited conclusions around, why not investigate the bigger picture. I'd like to see the research you could perhaps gather for all of us on FEMA's spending, The Road Home funding, and especially the Red Cross--where SO many Americans gave in the relief efforts. While interviewing the residents of NOLA on your trip, ask them if they got a single dollar from the Red Cross. The only thing that calms me is to remember that this is the biggest, costliest, most destructive ANYTHING this country has experienced. Think 9/11 but instead of over a 6 sqare block radius, they're dealing with about a 12 square MILE radius--and that's just for the New Orleans area! So much more enormous than words can describe. Come down for yourself and experience it. But remember to tour the areas of life too. Because New Orleans is still one of the most beautiful towns our country has to offer the world.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #11
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
I think this article raises some interesting points, however how can you list all of the fixed things as upgrades. For example, the new FieldTurf, scoreboards etc - if they were damaged and needed to be replaced couldn't these items be the same cost as the original equipment taking into account inflation. What you also don't know is who paid for what - perhaps the NFL paid for the upgraded field turf to protect their investment which is the players of the NFL.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #12
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
No mention of the Super Bowl, hosted at the Superdome about every 5 years; no mention of the Sugar Bowl, hosted at the Superdome yearly; no mention of the SEC Championship football game, scheduled to be hosted at the Superdome every three years. Those events will account for billion$ in economic impact for the city of New Orleans. As a taxpayer, I do not feel slighted in the least by the money the federal government spent to bring back the Superdome. Your attempt to belittle the economic impact that the Superdome provides to the region has failed. Does this mean that it's right that there are still thousands of citizens without homes in New Orleans? No, it does not. But that's an entirely separate issue. It has nothing to do with the money spent repairing the Superdome. And, btw, I seem to recall the federal government giving $2,000 to every citizen displaced by Hurricane Katrina. Quickly. FEMA also paid for hotel rooms and other housing for the victims, for months after the hurricane. It's not like these people have been totally 100% left out in the cold by our government. The "liberal" media has simply chosen to NOT report all of the good that has been done for these people. They will get their lives back. You don't simply rebuild 200,000+ homes overnight.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #4
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
It is well documented that "economic impact" numbers are greatly exaggerated and disputed. http://www.t...c-sports.asp is one example. I am not sure how you think that 115 million from FEMA is "an entirely separate issue". The money that the NFL gave is a separate issue. The average home price in New Orleans is $128,000 and the average yearly income is $35,878. (If you care to check, the stats are here: http://money...2255000.html ) I am not a math major, but it seems pretty obvious that 115 million could build a lot of houses (900? at market price).
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #13
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
This is a great article.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #14
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
That's a bit snide saying the liberal media did not cover the issues of the benefits paid by the federal government to residence of New Orleans and the surrounding areas. You are correct in the fact that the government attempted to go out of its way to help the residence of the area days after they royally screwed up helping them prior to, ie with evacuations. It took 3 days to get the national guard there when they should have been 3 days before the storm hit. This not with standings the attempts after the fact by the federal government where actually much larger then what actually got to the residence many trailers sit never occupied, never even delivered because local and state governments feared that the residence of these temporary housing would attempt to make this permanent. Not to mention that much of the things that the federal government didn't nessicarly get to the right people. For example inmates of the state of Louisiana and federal inmates that were housed in prisons in other states were given monetary reimbursements to get on back on there feet while they were uneffected by the storm since they were in jail. There are many many things that still need to be rebuilt and there is plenty of money that will still need to be spent. Only so many things can be done first. The city needs to get economically stable before people can move back in otherwise the federal government will be subsidizing it for ever. The super dome is a very large part of New Orleans economy since almost the entire economy is built on tourists or the expense of the people that serve the tourists. This building is not only important in its own right but the NFL is the biggest PR machine in the country and good PR for a tourist city is exactly what New Orleans does. There was much emphasise from almost all people during the game that the rebuilding of the Super Dome and the return of the NFL was a huge deal but still just one step in a long process that is no where near complete.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
I live in New Orleans. The overwhelming majority of us have no problem with them spending $180 million on the Superdome. It's a symbol of the rebuilding process. Yes, you can look around and see people moving back in, but a symbol as large as the Superdome lets the whole nation know it is ok to come back.

On to your claim that even though FEMA is paying less than required, taxpayers are still getting ripped off: FEMA is required to get the dome back to previous quality, yet you complain about the improvements made...

Are you aware of how much carpetting had to be replaced? How many acres of the roof had to be replaced? These things arent cheap. And the large videoscreens were destroyed. Are we supposed to find vintage 1990 video sceeens for the sake of "previous quality"??? No. We're going to buy new ones. As for the field- we'd been having field turf, as the astroturf was replaced a few seasons ago. So the new field turf IS previous quality.

But I'm sure as you live in Sacramento, and have provided such hard, detailed facts, youre the best judge of what went on, and how important fixing the Superdome was. Right?
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #15
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
It's logical that a football stadium is more important than someones home! Without football, they don't need a place to watch TV.....
Permalink
FranklinNobleSoccer Kid
1160 days ago
Score 0+-
My taxes paid for your stadium. I can criticize it all I want.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #15
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
Within the past week or so, I watched a news show that pointed out the 'lack of workers' to rebuild parts of the areas that were distroyed. But yesterday morning I heard that hundreds (possibly in the 800's) of workers were involved in getting the dome ready to go. I think that the impact that that labor force would have had outside of that building, would have been a hell of a lot better. Plus, fixing it is one thing, but upgrading it is another......

My Questions:

If people have no place to live around there, where are their ticket sales going to come from? How many homes could have been fixed or replaces for $180 million dollars? How many homes would have been fixed if they would have been able to hire that workforce elsewhere in the state?
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #16
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
If you are replying or writing in this space you have to ask yourself, "do I live in New Orleans?" Yeah the dome might have been "promised" money from FEMA. But do anyone think of checking to see of they actually did? I think that the Superdome only received the initial $2,000 check and someone else is floating the bill. Common people, do you relly think FEMA has it together enough to even spell one hundred and eighty million. No, but if you see someone in a FEMA shirt and ask them for help they will say, "I don't know.," then point you in the direction of the next person with a FEMA shirt to say the same thing. At this time the Saints have been the biggest economic impact for the city since Katrina. The City needs some receivables. We want to get on with our lives. We will learn from the past, hopefully stop voting in the crooked political figures, but we want to move on. I love the Saints. I have been going to Saints games since I was three years old. Being back in the dome brought back so many memories and made me feel so good about my city, I cried. I am a mocho man and this made me cry. Katrina took all of my worldly possesions, I didn't cry. She took my childhood home, I didn't cry. She took my grandparent home that survived 3 disastorous hurricanes, I didn't cry. But to see the Saints march on that shinny new familiar field, ready to lead this city into a new era of prosperity, the likes this city hasn't seen since the oil boom before I was born, I cried. This city needs that dome.

Question: Before 9-11 what dominated in the New York sky line. the twin towers right. Don't you think the people of New York would want to see the towers built back in a year bigger and better than ever? Do you really think they would care who payed for it? Well guess what dominates the New Orleans skyline. I wanted it back bigger and better. I don't care who paid for it. I live, I love, and I need New Orleans.

Article is well written, but please do not try to tarnish anything about that night. Can't it wait til next year. Do you not have anything better to write about. Just leave us alone.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #17
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
I am upset that you seem to think that 2% of the nations population isn't important enough to get money. 2% is a huge number of people, most major cities are 2% (NYC and Chicago are obvious exceptions) and everyone knows that you can't just let a city die. To all the people who think that it is a waste of money..... go blow it out your a$s (just incase of filters).
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #18
1162 days ago
Score 1+-
I made mention of this myself last mon. morning- http://pigli...mudgeon.html It's emblematic of the sickness in this country that hyping a football stadium takes precedence over people's welfare.
Permalink | Reply
FranklinNobleSoccer Kid
1161 days ago
Score 0+-
piglipstick is a great name for a blog. :)
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #19
1161 days ago
Score 0+-
How much did I just read that Congress approved to continue the war in Iraq? Give New Orleans and the Dome a break. You would feel a lot differently if you had lost nearly everything you ever owned.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #20
1157 days ago
Score 0+-
I can't remember the exact number, but there is a hell of a lot of money just sitting there waiting to be used. The Federal Government will not release the money to Southern Louisiana because the local government cannot provide any 'plan' for the reconstruction. The Feds aren't going to fork over close to 1 billion dollars without any type of plan or accountability in place.

Mississippi, Northern Louisiana, and the surrounding areas have had all of there reconstruction done long long ago. that is because their local leadership is actually doing there job.

The money has already been approved and appropriated, it is just waiting to be used.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #21
1149 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm a New Orleanian. I'm still not back in my house because my repairs have not been completed.

With so much devastation in the city, it's hard not to feel depressed driving the streets; yet, watching the repair crews replace the Dome's damaged roof was inspirational. Those guys were up there every day. Little by little, they got the job done & in time for the Saint's season opener.

I'm not a huge Saint's fan and I abhore government waste but to suggest it was wrong to spend $180 million on the Dome indicates that you don't understand how symbolic is the Dome to the city or our nation. The Superdome dominates the city skyline. The Dome was the catalyst for the skyscrapers that surround it, some of which await Katrina damage repairs to this day.

Not only did the Dome's rebuilding inspire me, it has also inspired many other New Orleanians to hope for the future - and we need hope. So many people have lost homes, jobs & family members. We're paying mortgages & rent, homeowner's & business insurance policy rates have skyrocketed, we're concerned about the levees breaking in a future storm, the number of shootings taking place is beyond belief and on and on go our woes ... but the Dome shimmers on the horizon like a jewel.

That Monday Night football game you saw was also seen by millions more around the country. Like you, they saw that New Orleans is open for business again. They saw the French Quarter. They saw that the spicy yet sultry spirit of New Orleans lives on. Frankly, that was millions of dollars worth of PR that New Orleans could never afford to spend yet it was provided by the NFL, cable & tv networks free of charge. With the dark clouds of war continuing to hover over our nation and no resolution in sight either in Iraq or Afghanistan, what better come back story could be presented to the nation than to show the rebirth of New Orleans via the Superdome.

As vulnerable as we are to hurricanes and flooding, some said that New Orleans should not be rebuilt; yet, New Orleans is so much more than just a place on a map. It's the largest port for break bulk cargo in the USA. It's the city where most of the corn & wheat exported from the USA leaves our shores. It's the closest city to America's largest oil reserves & thus home to those working on the oil rigs offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. It's the city where the British were so soundly rebuffed in the war of 1812 that they never fought us again. It's the home of Jazz, the French Quarter and so much more.

So I ask you: if you're community was virtually wiped away and the people of the USA offered to help rebuild one of your city's greatest symbols, is that so horrible? Really.

Larry

RideTHISbike.com
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Who_Paid_For_The_Refurbished_And_Upgraded_Louisiana_Superdome%3F"

This page was last modified 18:41, 19 January 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise