armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

What hath thou wrought?

10
Vote

by user Shrubbery

Barry Bonds is one of the most enigmatic sports figures in history. Only Bobby Knight can equal Bonds’ petulance displayed towards the media and fans. Bill Russell was surly and Ty Cobb was a miserable person. But with these men what you see is what you get. Not so with Bonds. His public persona has fluctuated more than the Dow Jones.

Not since the days of Ty Cobb have we seen an athlete who so brazenly thumbs his nose at the very people responsible for his fame, notoriety, and money. In an infamous episode Cobb went into the stands and pummeled a boisterous and admittedly critical fan. Thing is, this fan had one arm and Cobb gleefully beat the tar out of him. Now Bonds has never physically assaulted anybody but he’s time and again turned his back on his fans.

To say that his relationship with the media has been contentious would be putting it mildly. The only reason Bonds tolerates the media is because it’s a necessary evil of his job. Not that the media is virtuous or even kind and fact is they can be a den of vipers but if you foster at least an amicable relationship with them your job as a public figure is made infinitely easier.

His interview with ESPN in ’05 was a surreal if not revealing look at the man behind No. 25. In this impromptu session he claimed the media had broken him and his family. He looked and sounded utterly defeated. Now his reality show, Bonds on Bonds, which seems to be a not-so-veiled attempt to rescue his image, is shedding further light on what makes this powerful yet mysterious man tick.

Yes Bonds has been the most scrutinized athlete in sports over the last three years but the bed he now lays in was made of his own doing. It’s a shame such a gifted athlete has to act like such a surly pain in the ass. His physical talents are unquestionable and had he acted like a decent human being he might possibly have gone down as the most revered athlete this side of Michael Jordan and Muhammed Ali.

Then there’s the steroid cloud looming o’er Bonds’ head. The specter of potential steroid use threatens to undue 20 years of Major League magic and a lifetime of hard work. Bonds is a tireless worker, no one doubts his desire or gumption. They just doubt now the seemingly God-like physical gifts and mythical stats because of the alleged steroid scandal. Whether or not the BALCO accusations are legit, Bonds’ legacy takes a beating with every day of silence.

One simple gesture, a blood test, would dispel once and for all any talk of steroids. I’m not talking the sham that is the MLB drug testing scheme, I’m talking submitting to a state blood test so the California prosecutors, media, and critics will fade quietly away. This simple act of contrition will eradicate all talk of cheating and cement his status as perhaps the greatest baseball player ever and maybe one of the best professional athletes of this or any century.

Yet Bonds sits in stoic defiance as the media questions the veracity of his chase of Hank Aaron and passing Babe’s 714.

If Bonds goes down for steroid use he deserves his fate. If the fire that Bonds burned across the sky in his 20 years in baseball is suddenly extinguished then, once again, he deserves his fate. Bonds has the tools to squelch all talk of steroid use. He has the means at his disposal to reverse his aloof image. And he has the brains to ensure that baseball will remember him as one of its immortals.

Why doesn’t Bonds move to save his legacy? Why?

Date

Sun 06/04/06, 8:00 am EST

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DNLLegend
1275 days ago
Score 2+-
Even a blood test wouldn't save him now -- assuming, that is, that it'd come up clean. We know he used something (the "clear" and the "cream"), so a blood test won't fix his past. Also, the number of skeptics of blood tests are high. What if he's using something that's not detectable?
Permalink | Reply
ChristofMVP
1275 days ago
Score 2+-
Bonds does not care about anyone except himself. When you think you are better than everyone, what others think of you does not matter.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1275 days ago
Score 2+-
Precisely my point. Bonds is such an egomaniac you'd think he'd be farely desperate to rescue his image and legacy. He seems to be completely oblivious to how history will view him. This leads to a couple conclusions...he's juiced and is affraid of getting caught; and he flat out doesn't care about the fans or the integrity of the game. Either way he's one of the most disgraceful athletes ever.
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1275 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't know, honestly, if it necessarily holds that being an egomaniac is a strike against a person. Certainly, Pete Rose could have retired after tying Ty Cobb (and probably should have); Cal Ripken Jr. absolutely could have sat after tying Lou Gehrig; etc. There's rarely a reason to shatter a record that's as big as the game itself, and there's a certain panache about simply adding your name to the list. Both Rose and Ripken could have set a standard for sportsmanship by doing what I suggest above. However, Bonds could theoretically tie Aaron and hang them up -- but that'd not save his reputation. That makes me think that Bonds' problem isn't his ego, but something much better -- something well beyond his control at this point.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1275 days ago
Score 2+-
Ego is at the heart of Bonds' myopic view of baseball. Fitting that you'd bring up Pete Rose, who did what Bonds is doing, undermining the credibility of the game while simultaneously thumbing his nose and crying that he's being made to be a periah. Rose & Bonds are and were only concerned about themselves; this is the very definition of egomaniacal self-indulgence. If ego were not the driving force here then what is, pray tell?
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1274 days ago
Score 1+-
What I'm saying is that even if he (or Rose) makes (or had made) the noblestof gestures -- retiring upon tying a record, so that he does not break it -- it'd not save his reputation. Even though it'd be the opposite of ego-driven conduct, it would not matter.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1274 days ago
Score 1+-
It's not the retirement or even contrition at this point that will save their respective reputations. On this we agree. But if these impossibly arrogant and prideful men would throw themselves on their proverbial swords they might, just might, save their reputations. Pete Rose was guilty as sin, this we all know. Barry's case is trickier. Any talk of steroids is all conjecture at this point. Bonds has the luxury of the possibility of changing how history will viwew his career yet he does nothing. Why?
Permalink | Reply
SteaksammichRed-Shirting
1274 days ago
Score 2+-
There is absolutely nothing that Bonds can do during his playing career that will save his reputation. No matter what he does, 95% of the baseball fan population right now is going to hate him forever. He could catch a baby who fell from the upper deck of a stadium, cure cancer, and donate his entire fortune to charity and we will all still despise the guy. The only chance he ever has of being respectable is with future generations. If he changes his personality after his playing career to become a friendlier, better person then the new, young fans who never got to really watch him play will warm up to him. His reputation with the people today is forever tarnished, no matter what. But future generations won't be as down on him.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1274 days ago
Score 4+-
The Bonds/Rose comparison is simply not fair. Pete Rose was a player who had minimal talent, but more heart than probably any other athlete in any other sport, perhaps with the exception of athletes who have overcome cancer like Mario, Lance, and Sako Koivu. Pete Rose broke records with mediocre talent but an unbelievable will. He didn't quit after Gehrig because he wanted to play until that competitive fire was extinguished. Barry Bonds, on the other hand, is a cheater. He is a man of amazing talent, no heart, and tons of anabolic steroids (and probably human growth hormone). Every stat he has earned are deserving of the most exacting scrutiny. Pete Rose was a bad manager and a dishonest person, but as a player he was what every player should be. The fact is that all players in every sport, whether amateur or profession, should approach the game the way Rose did. On the other hand, if more people approach sports the way Bonds does, this humble reader will simple turn off the TV and learn to enjoy reading a book.
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1274 days ago
Score 3+-
That was me, in case you couldn't tell from the Pro-Rose/Anti-Bonds rhetoric.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1274 days ago
Score 2+-
Steak is exactly right here. All Bonds can hope is taht his nastiness passes into the fog of time. The article makes a good, point, too: that the current hatred of Bonds is about more than him cheating and chasing records. It's about him having a terrible personality and generally being totally unlikeable. If he'd been a great guy his whole life, who'd suddenly been accused of steroids, there would be much more debate than hatred. As it is, we all have presumed his guilt because it confirms our earlier dislike of the man. It may not be totally fair, but it's how people work, and he did bring it on himself, all of it. I personally remember liking Bonds, before the extent of his cheating was totally clear. There was a time when I would have said he was my favorite MLB player outside Boston. But, now after all that's been revealed of steroids and his personal history, he's probably my least favorite player in MLB - and that includes the Yankees. I've done a total turnaround on the man, and I think I'm not the only one.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1274 days ago
Score -2+-
There's an interesting dochotomy at play here. Look at guys like Giambi and Palmero. They were caught red handed using steroids, and in Raffy's case, testified before Congress that he didn't juice. Yet these two aren't denigrated as cheaters. Giambi is well liked by New York and the media has been fairly restrained in their critique of both. Now with Bonds, the exact opposite is true. The fans, media, and even other players hate the guy. He broke 714 and was booed mercilessly. Why the difference? Two reasons...first, Bonds has been a spoiled brat since his days at Arizona St. He cost the 'Devils a chance to play for a title and cost a revered coach his job. His pro career has been the mirror image. He cost the Pirates a chance to win a pennant because of his negativity and drove Kent out of San Fran. Second, his chace of the most hallowed number in baseball...714. Bonds has suplanted Babe in the books and true basebal zealots are fuming. As I said, if Bonds and his legacy are forever stained and his numbers come with a qulifying asterisk, he deserves it.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1274 days ago
Score 0+-
Shrubbery, you set up a false argument. Both Raffy and Giambi have been the subject of derision and scorn. Giambi was one of the most attacked players on the back of the NY Tabloids until he started hitting again (probably after he went back on HGH).
Permalink | Reply
CoreyisarealboyMajor Leaguer
1274 days ago
Score 0+-
I loved how Bonds tried to vilify the media, yet he couldn't have been so naive as to think the media was going to leave him alone after the steroid allegations and his attack on the record. The fact that he now has his own reality show proves even further he's a media and attention whore.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1274 days ago
Score 0+-
The Giambi/Palmero analogy is illustrative of how Bonds' continued arrogance and assault on the record books is a volatile mix the ensures the man will go down as perhaps the most hated and villified athletes in American sports history. It says something when proven cheaters, Giambi and Raffy and even Ty Cobb, didn't endure nearly the amount of criticism and animosity heaped on Bonds.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/What_hath_thou_wrought%3F"

This page was last modified 00:11, 17 September 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise