armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

What are the Celtics Doing?

10
Vote

by user Tyduffy

Image:T1_jefferson.jpg

ESPN has been salivating over a potential blockbuster four team extravaganza. The deal essentially would send Kevin Garnett to the Lakers, Lamar Odom and Andrew Bynum to Indiana, Jermaine O'Neal to Boston, and Boston's #5 pick with Al Jefferson to Minnesota.

Let's see what team is getting screwed in this deal. The Lakers get a top ten player in Kevin Garnett and suddenly become contenders. The Pacers get a good player and a potentially dominant big man. The Timberwolves get a high draft pick and one of the best young low post scorers in the game. The Celtics get aging star Jermaine O'Neal.

Why would the Celtics even consider making this trade? Al Jefferson is 22 years old and averaged 16pts 11reb a game. Jermaine O'Neal is a very old and oft-injured 28 who averages 19pts 9reb. Why would the Celtics trade Jefferson straight up for O'Neal let alone throwing in the #5 pick as the cherry on top?

Furthermore, why were the Celtics even considering trading for Garnett initially? Yes, pairing KG and Pierce together probably gets the Celtics the crown in a putrid Atlantic Division and into the playoffs. But does that get them past Chicago, Miami, Detroit, or the Lebrons in the Second Round? No.

The Celtics need a real rebuilding plan that is not "let's tank the season and pray we get Oden and Durant" or "let's try to make a sweeping trade to make us instant playoff contenders." If Paul Pierce was the cornerstone of a championship winning team, he should have been able to get the Celtics at least a playoff birth in the East. Nothing he has done in his career has shown that he is that type of player. If he isn't, why are they attempting to build a team around him?

Paul Pierce is a good to very good scorer. He is not a player who is going to lead the team to the finals or even a respectable playoff position. If you are trying to rebuild the franchise, it should start by trading him for either cap room, young players, or both. Unless your goal is so that he can retire his #34 with the Celtics as the one loser on a banner of winners, there is no sense in keeping him. Keep the #5 pick and get a Corey Brewer. Pair him with Al Jefferson and the pieces from a Pierce trade and go from there.

The sad fact is that Danny Ainge does not know what he wants to do. Does he want to rebuild? Does he want to be a playoff contender now? There has not been any coherent plan to rebuild the franchise. The so-called plan changes every year with the result that the NBA's most successful franchise has spent the last four years floundering like a fat kid stuck waist deep in mud. It has gotten so bad that Ainge may be close to getting bamboozled by Kevin McHale. He is even starting to make Isiah look competent.

Whatever the Celtics end up doing next year, it is safe to say that it won't lead them any closer to being a legitimate contender. In the corporate NBA where dollars and cents matter more than wins and losses, they won't risk trading their biggest attraction for the long-term benefit of the team. The Celtics will rejoin that loveable bunch of 20 teams who aren't good enough to win a title and not bad enough to improve through the draft. Danny Ainge will inexplicably keep his job, and those who can actually remember the Celtics winning a title will move comfortably into middle age.

Like what you see? Go here for more.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
JuTMSY4Legend
925 days ago
Score 3+-
you nailed your point with this:

"Why would the Celtics trade Jefferson straight up for O'Neal let alone throwing in the #5 pick as the cherry on top?" - Thats a very good point...

Secondly, the 5th pick will certainly yield a good player (No Oden, No Durant...the next best available will consist of Yi, Brewer, Conley, Horford, Wright)...any one of those players will help the celtics...namely, like you said, brewer...that trade makes no sense for the celtics...
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
925 days ago
Score 0+-
there is one reason why the Cs have to make a trade though...because paul pierce is demanding it...
Permalink
ChristofMVP
925 days ago
Score 0+-
I think the Celtics are still in the lose on purpose mode. Maybe it is because they didn't win the draft lottery! Who knows, but it sure does look like the Celtics are trying to extend their losing streak here.
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
925 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah, just look at what they're doing right now? NOTHING! They COULD lost Paul Pierce if they don't get someone in a week...
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
925 days ago
Score 0+-
The Celtics didn't want to include Jefferson in a trade for Garnett, no chance they send him packing for O'Neal.
Permalink | Reply
TyduffyRed-Shirting
925 days ago
Score 0+-
Is Paul Pierce a player who is going to bring a championship to Boston? No. So why are they building around him and going through all of this effort to make him happy?
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
925 days ago
Score 0+-
Cuz if they lose him, they aren't gonna win ANY games...
Permalink
Bobbyjim45Draft Pick
925 days ago
Score 2+-
I agree with you Ty, they have to dump off Pierce and Sczerbiak, make room for some good young guys, who they can build off of. Pierce could have a lot of trade value to a fringe contender, like the Bulls or somebody. Pierce to the Bulls for Ben Gordon and the 9th overall pick? Spread the rumor...
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
924 days ago
Score 0+-
Include Gomes and you got yourself a deal.
Permalink
Bobbyjim45Draft Pick
925 days ago
Score 1+-
Yeah, this deal isn't going to happen. ESPN was reporting yesterday that the Celtics were the team in this deal that didn't want to go forward because they didn't want to give up Jefferson. Ainge has a man crush on Big Al, I don't see him going anywhere for a long time. Plus, four team deals like this usually only get done in the twisted minds of the "experts", meaning the ex-GM's who work for ESPN because they sucked at being real GMs.
Permalink | Reply
TyduffyRed-Shirting
924 days ago
Score 0+-
Romiezzo, they didn't win any games with him. If they were the second worst team in the league with him, are they really going to do any worse without him?
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/What_are_the_Celtics_Doing%3F"

This page was last modified 00:13, 27 June 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise