armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

What Really Happened Between Michael Strahan and Kelly Naqi

6
Vote


Man, this Strahan story is crazy convoluted. If you watch ESPN or read print media reports, it seems like for all the world, that Michael Strahan is the poster-child for misogynist behavior. If you believe what you hear and read, Strahan pursued the age-old practice of attempting to intimidate a woman working in a male-dominated profession. Here’s how the Associated Press described the Naqi-Strahan exchange:

Strahan, who has been sidelined the last three weeks with a foot injury, called out Kelly Naqi, ESPN’s New York-based reporter, as she stood behind about three dozen members of the media trying to question him.

“Come here, I want to see your face when you ask this question, the way you are going to ask it,” Strahan said. “I know you are going to ask it in a way there is more division and more of a negative way than it was, so come here, I want to see your face, please.”

Strahan then asked the media to clear a path so he could see Naqi.

“You’re a responsible journalist, look me in the eye and ask this question the way you want to ask it,” said Strahan, who only came into the locker room after being told by the public relations staff that Naqi was questioning his teammates about his comments. “Look a man in the eye before you try to kill him or make up something.”

Wow. A cut and dried situation, yeah? Sounds like the Big Blue Balla’ gets the Punk-Ass Jock of the Year award, right?

But (and there almost always is)…

There’s this little nugget from Ralph Vacciano in the New York Daily News:

ESPN reporter Kelly Naqi isn’t the first reporter to be bullied by an angry athlete, and she undoubtedly won’t be the last. That’s why her boss’ response to Michael Strahan’s rant yesterday was that “It goes with the territory.”

“These situations happen,” said Vince Doria, the VP and director of news for ESPN. “(Strahan) felt compelled to do that for whatever reason.”

The following paragraph tells, from the ESPN side, why Strahan was so pissed:

Doria said he believed Naqi was singled out by Strahan because she had approached him earlier and asked him to go on camera to discuss what he said Monday on WFAN.

This goes right along with all we’ve heard. But a little later in the seven-paragraph story there’s this:

“He told her politely that he didn’t talk on Wednesdays, but he’d talk (today),” Doria said. “She thanked him. He went off out of the locker room. She then continued to pursue the story.”

And after Strahan was alerted about her pursuit, Doria said, “She was the obvious target when he came back out.”

Wait, wait, wait. What was that? Strahan agrees to talk with Naqi a day before he usually meets with the press. Then he walked out of the locker room. Hmmm, there had to be another exchange that went unreported; the exchange - at least - about a time to meet after Strahan had to leave the locker room to do whatever.

I wonder if there was something else said, or at the very least implied in the Strahan-Naqi exchange. I wonder if Mike said something like, “Now don’t go running around behind my back trying to get other info before you talk to me.” Why do I think this? Because Strahan was alerted about her pursuit. Pro jocks know the media. They know how reporters think and what their intentions are by their prior actions, and ESPN reporters are notorious for saying one thing to an athlete to gain trust, and doing another thing “to get the story the way they see fit.” And because Strahan was alerted about her pursuit, he had someone in the locker room watching Naqi’s actions.

From this, the story actually might look something like this: Michael Strahan is in the locker room after working out. ESPN’s Kelly Naqi pops over to Strahan’s locker and, knowing that he talks to the media on Thursday’s asks him if he’d do her a favor and talk with her for a couple of minutes today. Strahan, knowing he needs to put out any potential flames that might have been sparked by his comments about Plaxico Burress, agrees to an interview.

Strahan then tells Naqi that he has something to do first, but he’d definitely return for the interview. At this point, things get fuzzy because what’s not being reported, especially by ESPN or any other media outlet, is the whole exchange between Naqi and Strahan - which again, leads me to believe that Naqi didn’t keep up her end of the bargain that was struck in the exchange with Strahan. Strahan then finds an assistant and asks him to watch Naqi because he - obviously - didn’t trust Naqi, or her motives.

After Strahan leaves the locker room, Naqi immediately pursues Plaxico Burress and perhaps others to find out their side of the story, their feelings about Strahan’s comments on his radio show. Because Strahan is scheduled to speak to the media on Thursdays, all reporters must have known this fact. From the events in articles throughout the country, it appears someone told these reporters that Strahan was giving Naqi an interview when he returned to the locker room; that someone would have to have been Naqi.

At some point before re-entering the locker room, the assistant told Strahan of Naqi’s moves. By this time the reporter in the locker room is gearing up to ply Strahan with questions. Strahan is gearing up to confront Naqi when the throng of reporters is assembled. As soon as Strahan gets to his locker, he is besieged by reporters and there, conveniently at the very rear of the gaggle, is Naqi.

Rather than let this slide, Strahan gets understandably irate and calls out Naqi. The rest is history.

If you read between the lines, or read this oddly-placed seven-paragraph article written in the midst of lengthy articles around the U.S. about the Naqi versus Strahan run-in, then and only then can the truth of this matter be seen.

Source

  • http://dwil.wordpress.com/2006/11/30/what-really-happened-between-michael-strahan-and-kelly-naqi/


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ASwaffAll-American
1095 days ago
Score 0+-
The story MIGHT look something like this? MAYBE this is the way it played out? You WONDER if...? Sorry bud, conjecture doesn't pass for commentary. True, athletes try to intimidate reporters quite frequently. That's not what troubled me, and what you DON'T say in this article is what was truly telling about his response. It was the repeated references to what "men do" and how "we're men," etc. The way he said it sounded to me (and I'm usually wrong about motive, I'm just saying this was my initial reaction) was that Strahan wasn't just trying to intimidate her, but to send the message that this is a man's world she doesn't belong in. And no reporter that has done their job correctly and respectfully deserves to be treated that way. It's hard enough for women in that profession as it is without guys trying to man up and intimidate them.
Permalink | Reply
Mesoanarchy
1095 days ago
Score 0+-
This isn't a commentary, it's what I think happened based on the article I read that was soo odd compared to the other 20 or so I read previous to it. I feel that the 'I'm a man' chest-beating bluster was done for a reason - and out of anger. I feel Strahan felt that Naqi attempted to "punk" him by saying one thing and doing another. In other words, she straight out lied to Strahan and then got called out for it. Intimidation? Sure. For good reason? If the event played out the way it appears that it REALLY did, most definitely. And just because I happen to take an obviously unpopular stance on this matter, don't think I'm insensitive to the plight of women in ANY profession. I do though, KNOW for certain that ESPN's reporters have a reputation for being the slimiest in sports - men AND women.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1095 days ago
Score 1+-
I fail to see the lie. She heard the quote by Strahan, she went to Buress, she went back to Strahan for comment. Please tell me where she was out of line.
Permalink
The sharkDraft Pick
1094 days ago
Score 1+-
It's also not news. It should be an opinion piece.
Permalink
FranklinNobleSoccer Kid
1095 days ago
Score -2+-
Bah. Get the chicks out of sportswriting. Football, baseball, hockey, etc., should be reserved as the last bastions of manhood. If she doesn't like it, let her go cover the LPGA or something.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1095 days ago
Score 0+-
How very enlightened of you, Noble.
Permalink
Bobbyjim45Draft Pick
1095 days ago
Score 0+-
Yes Frank, we're the ones who invented the wheel and built the Eiffel Tower out of metal and brawn. They only have a third the size the brain of us... it's science.
Permalink
Mesoanarchy
1095 days ago
Score 0+-
C'mon ASwaff, don't be naive. If Strahan was so careful as to have someone watch Naqi while he was away, it's not a stretch to know that he and Naqi had an arrangement where Naqi was to get the story from him first and not others. So, the lie is when, as soon as Strahan left, Naqi went hunting - and lied to Strahan about waiting to get the story from him first. Again, how could all those reporters who know Strahan deals with the press on Thursdays, suddenly show up at his locker without Naqi breaking a trust with Strahan and going elsewhere to find something "wrong" with Strahan's utterances on his radio show, and then telling other reporters. That action is completely unethical and out-of-line. As someone who has been on both sides of the aisle, I know with absolute certainty that reporters do things like this. And it seems like the more protected they feel (by their newspapers magazines, networks) the more sanction they feel they have to pursue what they deem as "the story" no matter how unethical their actions may be. They do this because they no that no matter how mant trusts they break with those they cover, they'll be sent out to do another story. Just look at people like Jay Mariotti, John Clayton, and SI's Peter King. Mariotti can't walk into any Chicago professional team's locker room or clubhouse, yet there he is everyday at the Chicago Sun-Times. Same with Clayton and King and the NFL. Yet there they are.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
When did she say she would wait for Strahan to give her the story? She asked him a question and he said he'd talk to her, but I haven't seen any quotes from Naqi saying she'd wait for Strahan to give you the story. When you have nothing else to do, you continue to pursue the story and get as much information as you can. It's what responsible journalists do.


And I'm not saying that it's not a stretch to believe these things. What I'm saying is that if you're going to make these presumptions, you should have made it an opinion piece, and you should have titled it something other than "What Really Happened Between Michael Strahan and Kelly Naqi." You don't really know what happened between Strahan and Naqi. You have a gap in the story and you're filling it with conjecture.
Permalink
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1090 days ago
Score 0+-
This commentary sounds like an episode of Alias, it's so convoluted.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/What_Really_Happened_Between_Michael_Strahan_and_Kelly_Naqi"

This page was last modified 19:04, 12 December 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise