armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

US Soccer: At a Crossroads

12
Vote

by user Deuelio

Was Germany '06 a disaster for the US and it's "Army"? No way. Was it disappointing? Heck yes, which in itself proves something right there. The day the US is disappointed it didn't make it out of the group stage is a step in the right direction in my opinion. The US had never earned a point on European soil before they drew with Italy despite playing nearly an entire half a man down. That was a courageous performance. The fact remains however, that the US didn't deserve to go on. They tallied (and I'm speculating here) about four real shots on goal. Who knows, had Claudio Reyna's cracker in the first half of CR game found net, the whole experience for the US could have changed. But it's soccer and it found the wood, and the US is now vacationing.


What is our national team to do? There are several things that need to happen:

  1. We need a bona fide star who can take the game on his back and change it with one play. All the teams playing in the knockout rounds had this type of player. Who was it for the US? Reyna? Landon Donovan? Demarcus Beasley (shudder)? They just don't have that player right now, and until we develop one, we're still going to struggle in international competition.
  2. Claudio Reyna is quoted as saying there is too much structure in America's Youth Soccer program. Think about it. How often do you see kids in the park playing 7 v 7 or keepaway or something? I never do, rather, I see legions of kids being coached to death on trapping the ball, kicking the ball, and learning that going backwards is okay. (Editors note: these are all good things, but to a point). The problem with US soccer as a I see it, is there is no creativity. No flair. No individuality. All the things that make Americans hate the NBA (one on one play, freelancing, showboating) are exactly what USA Soccer needs. I just don't trust anyone wearing a USA shirt to elicit fear for a defender 1 v 1 the way a Zidane, Rondaldo, C. Ronaldo, even Ballack do for their respective sides.
  3. Any American soccer player good enough to get a contract from Europe must accept it. And stay over there even if the coach doesn't play you enough (does Landon Donovan ever come to this site?). MLS, God love it, just will not cut it if we would like to achieve international success. The level of play (I'm speculating here) is probably equivalent to a second or third division team in the top European domestic leagues (England, Italy, Spain etc.). Donovan, Beasley, Adu, Convey et al will only plateau as players if they continue to play for Real Salt Lake or whomever they play for.
  4. Find a new coach because Arena will most likely be gone. I don't think it's entirely his fault because several of his best players didn't show up at all (Donovan, Beasley...I'm looking in your direction). But he'll be fired and a new man will assume control. Who they get will be vital to the development of USA Soccer.

Bottom line, Japan/Korea we surprised people. We pounced on Portugal in game one and still needed help to get into the knockout stages. We got the help and capitalized on it. In Germany, our group was a nightmare, and neither the Czech Republic nor Italy were going to take us lightly, and it showed. We got the help we needed, but Africa's best team took us out.

Despite the three and out in Germany, USA Soccer is on the map.



Date

Thu 07/06/06, 5:46 am EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DeuelioJV Squad
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Still trying to work this armchairGM page. I forgot to log in.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
I sorta fixed the byline.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 2+-
Some of USA's best players play in the top or second top flight in England (e.g. McBride, Reyna). So your assessment of third tier is probably fair. USA can always take comfort that their qualification zone is awful in terms of quality. With three or four from there making it, Mexico, USA, and two others should make it (e.g. Costa Rica and T&T this time). If you can't beat countries like Guatemala and Belize there mus tbe something wrong with you. Therefore, USA should always get the chance to play in the Finals. But getting further may be a problem in the forseeable future.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Your points are right on.
Permalink | Reply
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
There are a lot of problems with American Soccer. First off you are correct more players need to play in Europe to get exposure to the world soccer scene. However, (my steven A impression) we also need to bring those guys back sooner. The USA cannot have 20 superstars playing in Europe who only come together to play 1 or 2 tourneys together the results will be the same. They need some unity. In terms of a star for the USA team think of my man Dempsey. He is up and coming gave the US a spark against Ghana, and although his dancing is terrible he adds a flare to the game that other American player dont. He is cocky, thats how the USA plays sports and it needs that on the soccer field.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1246 days ago
Score 1+-
The problem for much of that is geography; USA is in North America, thus they're in CONCACAF. Even continental competitions are lesser than in Europe. They are more sharp internationally in France, Italy, etc. but they play constantly. For example, right after this tournament ends they're going to start qualification for the European Championship. We just can't do that.
Permalink
Sayhey-rodSoccer Kid
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
All the south american countries do it (best players go to europe, roster is supplanted with domestic players) including brazil and argentina. Agreed we need more of a prescence in Europe, ironically, I think that will happen with better MLS play.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Most English players play at different clubs in the main, perhaps two or three play together, but that's about it. If US players play in Europe they would improve, as they would be exposed to a higher level of competition. Sweden has admitted that they have benifited from having several players in England has helped. I don't think playing together is as important as playing at a higher level.
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree, thats where the USA misses out on beating the crap out of the Bahamas and Bermuda doesnt prepare the USA team for the Cup. I do wish though that once a year the USA would travel to Brazil or Argentina to play them even if it was a blowout game it exposes the players to the best in the business.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
More international friendlies would be good, but you only get so much out of a friendly. We could use a tournament like the European Championships that all the North and South American countries participate in. That would go a long way to making us stronger if we played home and home with Brazil, Mexico, Uruguay, Ecuador, etc in hopes of winning a cup championship.
Permalink
Sayhey-rodSoccer Kid
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
We def need a new coach, while Arena I think Arena has done v. well until this Cup. He is great at scouting, has been since coaching at UVa, and should have some say in the program in the future. Klinsmann would be a great choice if we can pry him, he uses US coaching techniques and his stock is up due to Germany's performance. Maybe tough to get him though.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Not as tough as you may think, he lives in California.
Permalink
Sayhey-rodSoccer Kid
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
I know. But the kaiser is already on record as saysing he wants klinsmann back.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah, but Herr Kaiser might not get what he wants. I'm not sure how good a job Klinsmann can do when he doesn't even live in Germany anymore. Mind you, everyone said that before this World Cup. I suppose his attitude needs to change before Euro 2008. If he gets sacked there, it would still give him time to get into the US job. Perhaps Sven Goran Eriksson can do it - I know Jamaica have offered him a job, but £3million ($6million)/year might be too far fetched. Also, it is not Beckenbauer's decision, it is the German FA's decision. They may well want to hold on to Klinsmann too.
Permalink
Sportsdot
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
The thing is, it's not uncommon for even a great soccer nation to not make it to the round of 16. In 1992 England didn't even qualify. In 2002 France, the defending champions, (and about to be champions again?) did not win a single game in group play (2 losses, including one to a surprising Senegal team. and a draw -- sound familiar?) and did not make it to the round of 16. The US team picked a bad moment to fall flat, for certain, and I too would like to see Arena go in favor of a coach who will play more than one striker at a time. But a dissapointment at the World Cup is not any indication of a teams merits.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
1994 England didn't qualify. England needed to win 8-0 against San Marino. Unfortunately, San Marino scored inside 10 seconds... England won 8-1 and failed to qualify.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1246 days ago
Score 1+-
Yep, and one of my points was, now that we're disappointed that the US fizzled at the cup, it proves that US soccer is approaching respectability internationally. Before, just making the cup might have been good enough and there were no expectations beyond that. But now, after Japan/Korea, the US and its supporters expect the US to compete and win at this stage. That is a definite sign of progress.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Definitely. It shows that people care nationally, which is important as it makes the game more respected, and can only improve the standard of the game.
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
1246 days ago
Score 1+-
A big part of the lack luster performance of the USA program relates back to Arena. I love him as a fellow UVA man, but his laid back personality translates to the players. Reyna and Donovan both played with a lack of passion. The USA has talent but they need some fire under them and Arena cannot provide that.
Permalink | Reply
AndersedJV Squad
1246 days ago
Score 1+-
Claudio Reyna in SI talked about how US soccer is too regimented. Blame Arena, but also blame youth soccer. The US never just wound up and took a long shot from outside the box. That creates rebounds and such. Every other team did that. The US had the fewest shots and the least creativity in the entire field. No creativity. That's why it's fun to watch Brazil, etc. play. The question with that is: who's to blame?
Permalink
DeuelioJV Squad
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Who's to blame and how do we fix it?
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Best thing for the U.S.: South Africa is not Europe. So they can win some games in 2010.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
It's strange how things like that can be a psychological boost. The South African climate is also warmer than the usual summer European climate, so that might hurt the European teams.
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
South Africa will also eliminate any sort of an home field advantage for basically every team.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
There's one more for my term list - Home Field Advantage. Never used, but we have no alternative, so why not!? South Africa are good enough to hold their own in the World Cup. Playing at home is huge, look at South Korea in 2002, even the lacklustre German team this year. Also, England fans are notorious for travelling better than any other countries fans, so it may play into our hands.
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
1246 days ago
Score 1+-
Oh no I agree, but I was speaking in terms of when the Cup is in Europe its very easy for masses of English or Italian fans to travel to Germany, with the Cup in SA it will be difficult for the the traditional powerhouses to travel in the same droves they did this past summer.
Permalink | Reply
Jgov05All-American
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
The reason US soccer is so terrible is because kids grow up playing baseball and football, not soccer.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
And that that is where the money is in the US.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1246 days ago
Score 1+-
True, I've always wondered what American soccer would look like if guys like Dwayne Wade, Lebron James, Mike Vick, Ray Lewis and Donovan McNabb had trained their whole lives to play soccer and not football or basketball. That would be pretty impressive national side. But you missed my point. US soccer isn't terrible anymore. Just because mainstream sports fans don't follow it, doesn't mean we're terrible. In fact, we're closer than ever to becoming a soccer power in my opinion.
Permalink
I am a cpcpMajor Leaguer
1246 days ago
Score -2+-
It's at a crossroads alright, "Don't Care Boulevard" and "Never Will Parkway"
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
Fine with me if those are the two streets you see. Just don't hop on the bandwagon when things go well, and they will go well soon.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
The US soccer team was once great. They reached the Semi Finals of the 1930 World Cup. Although, there were a few things in their favour... It was held in Uruguay, so many of the great European teams couldn't afford to go. Also, they were the benificiaries of an unseeded draw, which gave them a very easy group. They lost 6-1 in the Semi Final to Argentina. I think they lost to Yugoslavia in the Third Place match. That was the best that the USA have ever done. In 1950, they even beat England 1-0...
Permalink | Reply
DeuelioJV Squad
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
1950 was Englands greatest defeat at the hands of the US. Second was 1776.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
At least we're not due for another 118 years! If our biggest defeat was 1-0, I'm not too worried about future England-United States matchups.
Permalink
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
1246 days ago
Score 0+-
1776 was done with style though: icy river crossings, (not really) drunk Germans, and the Christmas holiday. Lots of local pride here.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/US_Soccer:_At_a_Crossroads"

This page was last modified 17:48, 6 July 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise