armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

USC Opens at Number 1

19
Vote

by Nejoshi

As much as we hate to admit it, college football’s preseason poll that recently was released will have an overwhelming effect on the happenings on this year’s season.  The USC Trojans easily grabbed the top spot in the inaugural 2007 USA Today Poll, grabbing 45 out of a possible 60 place votes to clear the second-ranked LSU Tigers by a comfortable margin of 109 points.

College football has received its fair share of criticism for its counter intuitive method of using subjective tools to determine its football champion, and no element is more a part of that tainted method than the human polls.  Because voters use their preseason polls as a template for how they vote the entire season, it makes the recently released poll a profound element of who will be taking the field in the BCS National Championship Game in New Orleans on January 8, 2008.

Need evidence?  Just look at what the polls did three seasons ago when USC and Oklahoma were ranked 1 and 2 respectively in the opening preseason poll, while the Auburn Tigers, a team with potential in the tough SEC, was ranked all the way down at 18.  We all know what happened as all three teams finished undefeated, and the Tigers were left out of the National Championship party simply based on an inferior preseason ranking.  All of Auburn’s impressive wins in the SEC – including victories against Tennessee twice and LSU – were overlooked in favor of what the coaches and media thought preseason.  Auburn’s impressive 13-0 season was lost amid what the preseason poll said, and the Tigers were left without any part of the national championship, despite one of the most impressive regular seasons in memory.

Although the computer polls are convoluted and harder to understand than the straightforward human polls, they are essentially the same thing.  The brain trust of the BCS put the onus on coaches and the new Harris Interactive Poll to determine whom the best teams of college football are.  Two thirds of the BCS is determined by the two “human” polls, with the other third comprised of the average of several computer rankings.

USC inherited the top spot on the heels of last year’s impressive 32-18 Rose Bowl Game triumph over Michigan, who starts at the #5 spot in the poll.  Their poll position puts them at prime position to make it to New Orleans for a shot at the national championship.  Led by John David Booty, a trendy preseason Heisman Trophy favorite, USC will be fielding a juggernaut on the offensive side of the ball.  On defense, the Trojans will be as strong as ever with 10 starters returning to a team that was the team’s strength for long portions on the 2006 team.

Even though the preseason polls are largely overlooked as unimportant in the general public’s eye, at least one team that was ranked in the top two of the preseason poll has managed to make it to the national championship.  These teams have managed to make it there due to a favorable preseason ranking, just worrying about winning games instead of having to impress the voters.

The BCS has proved to be an ever evolving process that has changed to due to inaccuracies over its past, but when a team like Boise State, which finished last season as the only undefeated team in the nation, is left out of any shot at the national championship, there is something inherently wrong is wrong with the system.

The Broncos begin the upcoming season at #23, hoping to continue their reign as college foaotball’s most prominent mid-major.  Only two mid-majors have managed to crash the BCS party, with the Broncos one of them.  Boise State scored fans across the country with their amazing 43-42 win over Oklahoma in last year’s Fiesta Bowl, and will definitely be one of the teams on the radar for another BCS bid this year.

The 2007 college football season kicks off Thursday August 30, with several games on the plate, including #2 ranked LSU traveling to SEC foe Mississippi State.  The top-ranked Trojams begin their season on September 1 against the Idaho Vandals, a cupcake opponent from the WAC.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
848 days ago
Score 4+-
Not a single game has been played. How can a poll come out before a single game has been played?
Permalink | Reply
Behbigben15All-Star
848 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree with Christof, and I don't get how LSU is ranked higher than they were last year when they just lost one of the best QB's in college football, I don't understand how they rank college teams.
Permalink
Scottduk1Waterboy
848 days ago
Score 2+-
I can't believe that the Gators were third with the players they lost. I'm not sure about Tebow as the full time starter either.
Permalink | Reply
ChristofMVP
848 days ago
Score 0+-
IT is all based on hype, and nothing else. Hence, I think this is the dumbest thing in sports.
Permalink | Reply
MegECass110AAA-er
848 days ago
Score 0+-
You know what's awful? Steve Spurrier, in the coaches poll, gave Duke a #25 vote. Yes, you head me, Duke. Spurrier said he did it because Duke gave him a job when no one else would back in the day. Umm, loyal much? Stupid even more often?
Permalink | Reply
ChristofMVP
848 days ago
Score 0+-
I am surprisedhe did not give Duke the #1 vote. Heck, if you are going to make a mockery of the sport, do it ALL THE WAY!
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
848 days ago
Score 4+-
In other news, Dick Vitale has married Steve Spurrier.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
848 days ago
Score 0+-
Spurrier does it every year. He says he voted for Duke "until they lose" which usually happens pretty quickly.
Permalink
NejoshiDiv-I Stud
848 days ago
Score 0+-
i know that's why college football is wack
Permalink | Reply
Behbigben15All-Star
848 days ago
Score 0+-
Yes it is, I have heard many people say that college football is way better than the NFL, and that is not true.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
848 days ago
Score -1+-
Auburn 2004? Undefeated by beating "juggernauts" like Ball State, Louisina Tech, and the Citadel- sure. . . they deserved "some" national championship recognition. "Some recognition" if you live in the South, have a hard-on for the SEC, and are married to your sister. Get over it Southerners- yeah the SEC is THE TOUGHEST NCAA DIV. 1 FOOTBALL CONFERENCE- but all that means nothing if you schedule cupcakes in OOC competitions. (by the way- the PAC-10 has NO CHAMPIONSHIP game because of NCAA rules dictating that a conference has to have more than 10 TEAMS- read: 11 or more- competing in said conference in the calendar year of said sport in order to WARRANT A CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP GAME!) With that said, it is my opinion that Auburn should have been in the BCS game vs. USC instead of the Sooners in 2004- but then again, Auburn should have played USC earlier in the year (as they did the previous 2 years before) and maybe. . .just maybe- they wouldn't have been undefeated. Get my point? This is a tired and old argument to have. Totally asenine. Totally moot to argue about the who, what and how of the 2004 season.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
848 days ago
Score 2+-
I'm from Massachusetts (not a southerner, and flaccid when it comes to the SEC) and I felt as though Auburn got screwed, partially because of the pre-season poll. And to say that Auburn should have scheduled USC is a silly argument since schedules are made years in advance, and I doubt USC would be willing to play Auburn in the regular season. The SEC being the hardest conference means a lot more than scheduling some good non-conference opponents. A team plays 3 or 4 non-conference games. They play 7, 8, or 9 conference games. A team goes undefeated in the SEC, it's a major accomplishment. A team goes undefeated in their non-conference schedule, who gives a rat's ass?
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
847 days ago
Score 0+-
As silly as it might seem to Rawbeezeitz (Ich habe dein heisse gern. Sprichst du ja? Stimmt das?)- to posit an Aubrn/USC 2004 game, it seems just as silly to me that ya'll have some beef with the traditional as-all-get-out "pre-season coaches poll". 1: It's here to stay, ain't no arguing over the matter will change it.

2: It's done by individuals who happen to know a little about the matter (coaches coaching THE GAME)- regardless of their bias, subjectivity, and/or geo-graphic allegiances. 3: It's akin to feeling that "if a frog had wings, it wouldn't bump his ass a'-hopping!" Retarded! Asenine!

Cerebral pollution!
Permalink | Reply
Jeffreybear83Waterboy
847 days ago
Score 0+-
I think we are all forgetting the most important injustice of the poll, and that is BYU finished last season at #15 and starts the season at #34.
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
847 days ago
Score 0+-
College Football has been kinda biased towards USC ever since 2002.
Permalink | Reply
IbeargRed-Shirting
847 days ago
Score 0+-
College football is going to always be about debate as much if not more so than on field competition until they institute some sort of playoff. As long as that's gonna be the case why not have a coaches pre-season poll? just starts the debate early.
Permalink | Reply
GridironGoddessJV Squad
842 days ago
Score 1+-
To say USC would not have scheduled Auburn is innaccurate. USC would have, Auburn would have declined based on 2 embarrsing lopsided losses to SC two years in a row.

SC was #1 in both polls at the end of the 2003 season and left out of the BCS championship game for 2003 thereby creating the LSU faithful's cry of NO FAIR because there is a split championship on the books for that year. SC has maintained over the years they wiill play LSU anytime anywhere. LSU will not play USC and coach Les Miles has made some colorful comments about USC lately.

Yes, college football has been kinda biased towards SC for the last 5 seasons. Like it's been bisased towards Miami or Notre Dame or Alabama or Nebraska or whichever program is having a long run of winning seasons and excellent teams.
Permalink | Reply
HappyskinnyAll-American
842 days ago
Score 0+-
Only one of those games against Auburn was lopsided. However, you are correct in that Auburn may decline because they have to play great teams all the time in the SEC, while the PAC 10 is a one man show with USC.
Permalink
GridironGoddessJV Squad
842 days ago
Score 0+-
exactly. and many of the SEC teams, Auburn included in 2004 when they were left out of the BCS title game, play those non-Div 1 OOC games that help their record but hurt their standings. Sure, Strength of Schedule was officially removed from the calculation several years ago, but it still plays a part in determining standings. If USC is playing Nebraska and ND and Auburn or whomever is playing Loisiana Monroe and Louisiana Tech -- it is going to be looked at, no matter how much people want to deny that fact.

Now SC opens with a suspicious looking cupcake game with Idaho this year. I happen to know from sources within the SC Athtletic Dept that they have a hard time filling their 3rd OOC game a lot of the time as many schools not willing to use their OOC easy win game chance and sched a USC/UF/OSU, etc.

And the Pac 10 is not truly understood by those outside of this region. Yeah SC is the nat'l power, and Cal and UCLA can put up a decent argument, etc. But no matter how good or bad you are in the Pac 10, the conference plays so weirdly tough against each other. It doesn't matter if SC is #1 and UW is the worst team in Div 1-- all pac-10 conference games are tough.
Permalink | Reply
HappyskinnyAll-American
842 days ago
Score -1+-
I understand that SEC teams may play some cupcake games, and USC may play some OOC games, but thats my point. It evens out because the SEC is so much better than the Pac 10. I don't but your argument about the Pac 10 though. It doesn't really make sense to me that the conference plays "weirdly tough". When you say UW is a tough game, that is like saying It is a tough game for good teams in the ACC to play Duke just because its an ACC game.
Permalink
HappyskinnyAll-American
842 days ago
Score 0+-
It should say "I don't buy*"
Permalink
GridironGoddessJV Squad
842 days ago
Score 0+-
Happyskinny--if you lived in CA, AZ, OR or WA you'd get what I am saying about Pac-10. I've got friends from PA and NC and TX, etc who had your POV prior to living out here, but their exposure to Pac 10 games had them all soon calling to say, OMG you are right, it is so weird. ha ha ha ha I wish the other Pac 10 schools would get with it and have better teams though. Its no good for ANY conference to have a majority of teams that aren't winners. Like, um Hello Big East. :)
Permalink
HappyskinnyAll-American
842 days ago
Score 0+-
Well, I wont have to wait long, because I will be moving to Arizona in the spring, so I guess until then I'll have to take your word for it.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/USC_Opens_at_Number_1"

This page was last modified 02:03, 5 August 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise