armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Too Much Emphasis on National Title in Heisman Voting?

11
Vote

by Donatevo

Am I the only person who thinks there is entirely too much emphasis placed on winning the National Title, when considering who should win the Heisman? Shouldn't the award go to who we believe is the best college football player, period. I think it should. If he happens to play on an inferior team, I don't care. If he's a running back, it probably means his offensive line isn't as good as the National Champs. If he's a quarterback, he probably doesn't have as many offensive weapons as the National Champs. Let me offer up a few examples.

  1. 1997 - National Champion: Michigan - Heisman Winner: Charles Woodson, Michigan. This is the same year in which Peyton Manning got 2nd in the voting. Hello?
  2. 1996 - National Champion: Florida - Heisman Winner: Danny Wuerffel, Florida. This is the same year that Troy Davis gained over 2000 rushing yards in a season...for the second time. No one else has done it twice, ever. Only nine backs have ever done it once.
  3. 2002 - National Champion: (disputed) Southern Cal - Heisman Winner: Carson Palmer, Southern Cal. Of course many voters were leaning towards Brad Banks (Iowa) as the Heisman front runner, until they lost to Southern Cal in the Rose Bowl. But don't forget third place vote getter Larry Johson of Penn State, the ninth person to ever rush for over 2000 yards in a single season. To me, he was the obvious choice. Surely his line wasn't as good as SoCal's or Iowa's.

There are so many other examples where being close to the title, gave a player the nod over players who were clearly (to me at least) more outstanding players. An example that comes to mind is Eric Crouch, Nebraska's all time total offense leader, by the time he left school. Sorry to say this, but as a Missouri fan, I can't help but notice that Brad Smith, who's numbers were better overall than Crouch's, (Smith ended his career 5th in total offense in NCAA history) never got higher than 5th in the heisman rankings.

Oh well, truth be told, Missouri was probably responsible for Crouch getting the honor, when they allowed him to elude a near sack and worm his way 95 yards for a highlight reel TD against their bewildered defense.

Sigh.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
TrizzAll-American
797 days ago
Score 0+-
Just like MVP voting in the NFL,NBA,MLB the Heisman goes to the best player on the best team unless another player is having an unheard of season on a well known program i.e. Colt Brennan not even goin to get the invite to New York but John David Booty will
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm just thinking for example, if only 9 backs have ever gone over 2000 rush yards, then if someone does, its a fairly unheard of season. Point taken about Colt.
Permalink
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 0+-
I just don't like it. Too bad for me.
Permalink | Reply
Taytay 24All-American
797 days ago
Score 3+-
The Heisman is awarded before the title game, so I don't think there is too much emphasis on it. If it was after the bowl season, Vince Young would have won in a landslide. You could make the case, however, that players from lesser programs get overlooked in favor of players from BCS programs.
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 0+-
Good points.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 2+-
The point of the game is to win, so unless a player on a losing team puts up ridiculous numbers, I don't think they should be considered for the Heisman. My biggest beef with the Heisman is that it is pretty much only awarded to QBs and RBs. Only 5 times has the Heisman NOT gone to a QB or RB.
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 0+-
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it should go to a player from a losing team, just a truly outstanding performer from a good team. I agree with your biggest beef.
Permalink
1MountaineerWaterboy
797 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree that there is too much emphasis on the lesser teams... but looking at this at another vantage point is that a Heisman winner should be able to lead his team to victory... and the team should get credit for allowing that player the chance to make the plays thats neccessary to get the votes.
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 0+-
That's an interesting perspective. I like it.
Permalink
DNLLegend
797 days ago
Score 3+-
My big gripe is that if you're not a QB, you either have to play in a season w/o a dominant QB and/or be other-worldly.
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
797 days ago
Score 0+-
Absolutely true.
Permalink
Taytay 24All-American
797 days ago
Score 0+-
And then there is Vince Young, the rare case of an other-worldly and dominant QB who didn't win.
Permalink
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
795 days ago
Score 0+-
Good point, Tay.
Permalink
KelsdadAll-Star
797 days ago
Score 1+-
You think? I agree 110% with Trizz. The fact Colt Brennan plays in Hawaii against a less than competetive schedule eliminates him from consideration irregardless of his stats. And that sucks.
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
795 days ago
Score 0+-
I think Trizz is talking about the factual reality of how the voting goes. I agree with you that it sucks.
Permalink
NejoshiDiv-I Stud
797 days ago
Score 3+-
Yes, there is definitely an emphasis on being at or near the top of the country to get the Heisman. At this point in the season I would say that Brennan and Darren McFadden are clearly the two best players in college football. However, the fact that Brennan is in the WACk and McFadden's team is 1-2 takes them out of the running for the Heisman, which is very unfair. You cite some good examples as evidence to back up your point as well. I think the funny thing has been watching Heisman trophy winners fail on the game's biggest stage. This has becomg more and more common in recent years. When Chris Weinke won the Heisman in 2000, he was outclassed in the BCS National Championship Game by Oklahoma in a game where Florida State only scored 2 points. Eric Crouch (2001), Jason White (2003), Reggie Bush (2005), and Troy Smith (2006) all fell victim to the same fate in the BCS National Championship Game. Out of those, only Bush even had a decent game in the championship game.
Permalink | Reply
DwalbertVarsity Captain
797 days ago
Score 1+-
Jason White beating out Larry Fitzgerald (even as a Sophomore) still pisses me off to this day. Nice comment joshi.
Permalink
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
795 days ago
Score 0+-
Another example. Only one person has ever won twice. We probably all know that that is National Champion Ohio State's Archie Manning. Who incidentally gained less than 4000 yards as a pro. Wow!
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
797 days ago
Score 2+-
If anything has "too much emphasis", it is the Heisman itself.
Permalink | Reply
Taytay 24All-American
796 days ago
Score 0+-
True that. There's a reason there are so many "Heisman busts".
Permalink
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
795 days ago
Score 0+-
Awards voting is generally stupid. This has nothing to do with sports, but I hate the Oscars and the Grammys.
Permalink
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
795 days ago
Score 0+-
Thanks for piping in, everyone!!
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Too_Much_Emphasis_on_National_Title_in_Heisman_Voting%3F"

This page was last modified 20:42, 28 September 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise