armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Thoughts on Gary Matthews

9
Vote

by user The Beast

So the Los Angeles Angels have signed former Texas Ranger Gary Matthews for a $50 million dollar contract. Matthews is coming off his best year, but on the down side he is 32 and by the end of his five year deal, he'll be 37. While, Matthews may not be that big bat the Halos have been looking for, he certainly fills a need and could be a big steal come spring training.

After speaking with several Ranger fans and reading various blogs around the web, I have come to these five conclusions on how Matthews will effect the Angels this season.

1. Gary Matthews is Vince Carter in a baseball uniform.

Like Carter makes the acrobatic dunks, Matthews makes the acrobatic catches in addition to his strong arm. Where the Carter comparisons really come in is the fact that he makes mistakes. Both he and Carter go for the splash instead of the simplicity. Last season he had 7 errors.

2. Matthews won't provide that big bat.

"His .313 batting average is good, but his accompanying .371 OBP doesn't bloor the doors off." His 20 home runs clearly aren't the offensive firepower Moreno had promised.

3. He is an injury waiting to happen.

Matthews is a reliable center fielder when healthy. However, his durability is a major concern. At 32, he just played 146 games in 2006, which is surprisenly the second-most of his career (152 in 2001). He has four seasons with fewer than 145 games played.

4. He fits into the Angels offensive strategy.

While Matthews obviously lacks a power bat, he is a double-hitting machine. Last year he was 7th in the American League in doubles. The Angels encourage the type of players who can get on base any way they can, singles, doubles, walks, you name it. Matthews is already tops in the AL in doubles. When leading off, he could be in scoring position very often.

5. He fills a need.

This is the most obvious and important note of this acquisition. The Angels have lacked a true center fielder for the past two years. They've tried Chone Figgins, but his natural position is in the infield. Darin Erstad is clearly past his prime and injuries are starting to take their toll. Matthews can provide a constant defensive presence in center field, which the Halos have lacked. He will be slated to start 162 games if he is healthy.

In addition to playing center, he fills the need of a lead-off hitter. Since Figgons strikes out too often, Matthews is a welcomed improvement. This allows Figgy to play second leadoff, batting ninth.

Final Verdict: Matthews is an addition, a piece, but not the answer. He will not solve the Angels' offensive struggles, but he could be a major contributor on a World Series team. Yes, I said World Series because this team can win it all with a Manny Ramirez-type bat.

So is he good for the Angels. Yes! Undoubtedly so. At 50 million? Well that's a little different. Matthews is a solid addition to the Angels this offseason even at 50 million. There is no doubt he will contribute to their championship surge. However, if they plan on winning it all they still must find some power.

Can be also read at http://rallytime.blogspot.com/

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Davis21wylieMVP
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
Baseball Prospectus' career stats on Matthews:
AGE YEAR TEAM   OUT  UEQR    EQA  EQR BRAR BRAA  FRAR FRAA PRAR  WARP1
24 1999 SD_-N   28     4   .246    4    1   -1    1    0    0     .2
25 2000 CHI-N  129    11   .195   11   -6  -11    6    3    0     .0
26 2001 CHI-N  210    31   .243   31    4   -6    0   -9    0     .5
26 2001 PIT-N  114    20   .258   19    5    0    4   -1    0    1.0
27 2002 NY_-N    1     0  -.224    0    0    0    0    0    0     .0
27 2002 BAL-A  263    55   .277   53   20    8    6   -2    0    2.8
28 2003 BAL-A  132    10   .188   10   -7  -13    2   -3    0   -0.5
28 2003 SD_-N  228    39   .266   42   13    2    3   -4    0    1.8
29 2004 TEX-A  207    45   .265   38   11    2   15    7    0    2.9
30 2005 TEX-A  360    66   .255   59   14   -3   13   -3    0    3.0
31 2006 TEX-A  441   106   .280   92   36   16   11   -7    0    5.2
Hmmm, one of these seasons is not like the others... Could it be the only one in which he got 500+ at-bats? The only one in which he posted a WARP even close to 5? The one which, at age 31, is most likely unrepeatable? Seriously, on what planet is Matthews worth even close to $50 million? So yeah, you're absolutely right -- he's not a bad player and probably won't hurt the Angels on the field, but that contract would only make sense if he was actually capable of Manny Ramirez-esque production, which ain't happening in a million years.
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm a little new to baseball. I've have only been an avid fan for the past year of two. While I licked it before I have begun a real interest as of late. Let me ask you this question than. Does a high payroll hurt the team. If the owner can afford to pay him 50 million than does it matter. There is no salary cap in MLB. Right?
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
1094 days ago
Score 1+-
I didn't lick it. I liked it. My fault.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
1094 days ago
Score 1+-
True, there is no salary cap. However, nobody -- not even Arte Moreno or George Steinbrenner -- can afford to pay as much for players as they'd like. Everybody's got a budget, from the Red Sox to the Devil Rays. And, eventually, overpaying for players is going to kill your franchise, because when a guy is consuming a disproportionate amount of your budget, you suddenly can't allocate proper resources to fill other needs. You have to make due with replacement-level talent at one position because you've overpaid at another. Plus, when you dole out enough of these bad contracts and the entire team suffers, fan interest (read: gate receipts) declines because the team is losing, and you suddenly have even less budget to work with than before. It's not as bad as it used to be; baseball teams used to have to give away draft picks when they sign top free agents, meaning that your farm system would become depleted along the way as well, but that practice was eliminated this offseason. Still, the effects of handing out bloated contracts to average-at-best players (or, worse yet, terrible players like *cough* Eric Milton, *cough* Cristian Guzman) cannot be understated. Don't misunderstand me -- one bad Gary Matthews contract will probably not torpedo the Angels. But the kind of thinking that led to Matthews' deal almost always leads to other similarly misguided transactions, a couple more of which will destroy a franchise.
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
Thank you for the explination. Very helpful.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
Hey, no problem. By the way, if you ever want a bona-fide expert's take, ask User:DNL what he thinks of the Matthews deal -- he's way more knowledgable than myself on the subject of MLB player contracts, and the business of baseball in general. I can run circles around him when it comes to basketball analysis, though :)
Permalink
JeevesJV Squad
1094 days ago
Score 1+-
There's sort of a salary cap; MLB has a luxury tax. If a team goes over the limit they have to pay a tax on the amount they overspent. The first time they go over the tax they pay 22.5%, the second time 30%, the thirs time 40%, and I think it stays at that if the threshold is broken again.

Also, they are still doing the whole draft pick compensation, but I'm not fully sure what the changes are. I know they did away with type C free agents and made it tighter for Type B and A free agents.

Just found an article about it...

http://mlb.m...amp;c_id=mlb
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
Thanks for clearing up the compensatory-draft-pick thing. I had read something back in August that said they were trying to outlaw it completely for the new CBA, but it appears they've only gotten rid of Type C FA's. This just reinforces the need to spend wisely on free agents, because they can hurt your farm system in addition to costing you money.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1094 days ago
Score 1+-
$50 million bucks to have web gems from a player in your uni
Permalink | Reply
JeevesJV Squad
1094 days ago
Score 1+-
I've done a decent bit of research on Matthews, because there were rumors of the Sox going after him (thankfully we didn't).

Matthews was DFA'd three times in his career and turned in a career year this year, in a hitter friendly park. He is very athletic, but not neccesarily the greatest fielder. He somehow parlayed some truly spectacular catches into a reputation as a great fielder. Of all qualifying center-fielders, he actually had the lowest rating by Zone Rating (which is one of the more realiable fielding metrics).

Odds are he won't put up the same production as he did last year, but I woudn't say he has no shot at performing up to his contract, at least for the first couple of years.
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
Contract is one of the worst ever. Really.
Permalink | Reply
Davis21wylieMVP
1094 days ago
Score 0+-
It kind of makes you pine for some of those Steve Phillips-era Mets contracts, doesn't it?
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1093 days ago
Score -3+-
Yankees are baseball
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
1093 days ago
Score 1+-
Shut up! Yankees suck!
Permalink
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1092 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't recall Matthews being an inury-prone player, even in his days with the Baltimore Orioles. I think the reason he played so many games last season (the second-highest total of his career, like you said) was that Texas gave him the full-time gig. In Baltimore, and a couple other places, he was more of a bench player, someone who didn't start everyday and didn't really see significantly consistent playing time.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Thoughts_on_Gary_Matthews"

This page was last modified 00:18, 8 August 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise