armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The media don't understand Formula One

11
Vote

by user Alex Holowczak

Last weekend's Monaco Grand Prix has turned out to be rather controversial.

Ron Dennis said on TV that he told his drivers not to push the car when they were first and second and it seemed like Hamilton could maybe pass Alonso. Under rules in Formula One, that's a no-no - a team need to leave it to the drivers to make that decision.

I am a patriotic Brit. I am backing Lewis Hamilton to the hilt in this championship, and I hope he wins it. Back here, the papers have been slandering Dennis, for not giving Hamilton the chance to win the race.

But I am fully on Dennis' side.

His drivers were in first and second place. A dominant first and second place at that, there were no rivals anywhere near them. The common sense thing to do was to tell the drivers to hold station. Bring both cars home, it keeps the team happy.

And it's not just me. Ex Formula One drivers, such as triple World Champion Sir Jackie Stewart, quadruple runner-up Sir Stirling Moss, and ex-driver turned commentators Martin Brundle and Mark Blundell all agree that McLaren did absolutely nothing wrong. It was the common sense decision for the team.

Formula One as a sport has always been about the team. In the days that Moss drove, it would be quite common for a Number 2 driver to give up his car to the Number 1 driver in the team if the Number 1 couldn't drive his car. It would be done to maximise the team result, not the driver itself.

In 2002, this was taken too far at the Austrian Grand Prix, as Michael Schumacher was allowed to pass in the last half a mile of the race by his teammate Rubens Barrichello in order to win the race. That was clearly too far, Barrichello eased off. It maximised the performance of one driver in the team, not two.

It's a hard thing to put a rule too. Although usually, common sense seems to be the general logic behind the idea. You can tell if it's not right when it happens. There was nothing wrong with what happened on the streets of Monte Carlo on Sunday, as it helped the team, and didn't favour one driver over another.

Now there has been speculation of Hamilton leaving McLaren.

To explain, Hamilton was a prodigy of McLaren. Dennis saw him at a young age, and through the years, he helped to nurture him through the junior formulae until he made it into Formula One this season. Leaving McLaren for Ferrari, as is rumoured, is really not on the cards.

The media has over-reacted in an act of national patriotism. The disadvantage of not knowing about the done thing in motor sports.

Monaco was fair. Alonso won, and Hamilton was second. And Hamilton is not going to leave McLaren. He has a perfectly good team there, and has shown he is almost a match for Alonso already. Which considering Hamilton has been in five races, and Alonso five seasons, shows that Hamilton will soon have the edge on his teammate.

If anything, I see Alonso leaving for Ferrari or another team in the near future. Hamilton has been backed throughout by McLaren, and they have no reason to end that in the future.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Pnatt IIJV Squad
913 days ago
Score 0+-
The media don't understand anything, not just Formula One.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
913 days ago
Score 0+-
Well from an american standpoint...Nascar is based on a 1 car team...not sure if it is different for F1...but assuming it is, that would seem to account for any american confusion...why wouldn't you go for the win?
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
913 days ago
Score 1+-
F1 has a 2 driver team. So there are two cars in each race for each team. In this race, McLaren were 1-2 and about a minute ahead of third place. There is a Constructors' Championship for all the teams too. The teams win money at the end of the season based on their standing in that. So it makes more sense to let them finish 1-2 than have Hamilton have a go at winning and taking them both out. In which case the team scores 0 instead of 18, and allows Ferrari to take the win. Also, that is unbeneficial to the drivers too, as the Ferrari drivers would take the lead in that. This keeps both drivers in the hunt, without letting the Ferrari drivers in. From a logic perspective, keeping the drivers 1-2 makes sense for all parties involved.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
913 days ago
Score 1+-
In F1, the teams take precedent over the individual drivers (except in that absurd instance Alex cited, where Ferrari forced #2 driver Barrichello to let their #1, Schumi, pass for the win). So I agree with Alex that it was completely within McLaren's rights to tell Hamilton to back off Alonso and not try to pass, because a 1-2 is very valuable to a team in the Constructor's Championship.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
913 days ago
Score 1+-
You got there seconds before me.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
913 days ago
Score 0+-
Sorry, the media is too busy overanalyzing Roger Clemens throwing high and inside to minor league teenagers half his age.
Permalink | Reply
ThecrookedcapAll-Star
913 days ago
Score 1+-
It's simple: Don't take out your teammate!. That's what they were doing.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
913 days ago
Score 0+-
and yet, this seems reasonable to us non F1 folks...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
913 days ago
Score 0+-
What difference does it make to the team which driver finishes first or second? Once it is clear that the team has secured first and second, why can't they compete btwn themselves if they want to.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
913 days ago
Score 0+-
Because if they take each other out in the process, it hurts the Constructors' Championship. Which gives a lot of money to teams, so it hurts in future. Also, both drivers will have problems in their championship campaign. Also sponsors may pay on race finishes, e.g. It just avoids any potential problems.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
913 days ago
Score 0+-
The whole thing seems odd, though, in-line with how Europeans try to make every sport team oriented as opposed to individual oriented. Not knowing much about Form-1 except from comments above, it appears that a team with a drivers finishing 1st and 20th would be worse off than a team with drivers finishing 5th and 6th, if aggregate finish for the team is what the result is based on.

This thereby disenfranchises the individuality of a sport where really, there is no true connection btwn drivers other than that they are sponsored by the same body.

I can see the pt in Cycling, where there is a need for teammates to assist each other as it is very physically demanding. But not so much in auto driving. Nor in golf or tennis comps where Europeans changes the rules (ryder cup). They put so much weight into these competitions but Americans do not.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
912 days ago
Score 0+-
On the contrary. It isn't team orientated at all. It is mainly driver orientated. The main thing was that Alonso is regarded as the #1 driver at McLaren - i.e. all efforts to win the Drivers' Championship goes towards him. That was also probably going through their minds. And with your summary, the way the points system works, 1st & 20th is 10 points, 5th and 6th is 7 points, so 1st & 20th would be better.

The team mates have to work together. They share information on setting up the car, which in the limited time to do that, is a big help. While one car test one thing, another can test another factor. Also it has helped in previous races. If one driver in the team is fighting another for the championship from another team, then the teammate can come into play by holding up the other teams drivers. It can make for exciting viewing.

As for changing the rules of golf, matchplay was the original form golf tournaments were played in. The US were very good at it until 1975, when Britain gained Europe and started to get good at it. So now you start losing, don't be a whining ninny. It's the US team ethic that lets them down, not the scoring rules of the game.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #3
912 days ago
Score 0+-
Indvidual match play was the original form of golf and one in which US golfers are very successful at, if results of the Accenture matchplay tourney suggest. Not too many tournaments use a team match play format like the one used in Ryder Cup. Which is why I think Americans don't put as much stake in it as Europeans.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_media_don%27t_understand_Formula_One"

This page was last modified 19:52, 30 May 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise