armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The future of the NHL

13
Vote

by user Randman

First off, let me start by saying that I don’t have solid attendance and revenue numbers to back-up my opinion, but if I decided to dig for them I suspect that they would support my thoughts. I’m just writing this off the cuff, to spur some discussion.

The NHL is dying a slow death in the United States. We’ve seen the movement of teams, the absence of a big time television deal and a recent work stoppage which has resulted in the decrease of fan interest in the NHL and even the sport itself. Meanwhile, the resurgence of the NBA and the increasing interest of College Basketball have continued to draw fans away from hockey.

Right now, the Stanley Cup playoffs is currently underway. In my opinion, it falls behind the following sports in terms of interest. This list is in no particular order. The point is that hockey falls after all of these other sports/diversions:

• MLB Baseball • NBA Playoffs • NASCAR • NFL Draft • Horse Racing/Triple Crown

Additionally, hockey is not a sport that every kid on the corner plays or has any interest in playing. A child simply cannot walk down to the local playground or go to their backyard to play hockey. There are substantial costs involved with purchasing equipment, buying ice time and even traveling to regional ice arenas (if there are any nearby). It much easier and inexpensive to grab a basketball, a soccer ball or a bat, glove and baseball and head out to a friend’s house or a local ball field to play.

More easily accessible sports will also lead to the demise of the NHL in the United States. The future fan base will decrease and less folks will be willing spend money to go to games.

So, what happens next…

I think that there will continue to be just enough fan interest in the United States to sustain hockey in large and traditionally successful markets; New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, etc. However, smaller markets will slowly see their teams fade away until they are to the point that they either need to suspend operations or move elsewhere.

Where do they move? My future vision of the NHL involves a drastic realignment of the league into 2 divisions – one in North America and another in Europe where interest in hockey is pretty substantial. How many teams will there end up being? I don’t know. Where will they be, I really don’t know that either. My point is that the NHL does not have a future by being a strictly North American product. They need to tap into the global market to sustain the league.

Scheduling this would be a tough undertaking, but perhaps a simple thought would be to have the European teams come to North America for 3-4 week tours, which would be followed by the North American teams touring Europe. The playoffs would need to be shortened and perhaps the site of the finals would have to alternate back and forth.

This idea sort of sounds like a Hockey World Cup of sorts and perhaps it is this type of format that would allow the league to sustain itself.

This is just my opinion and I’m interested in hearing what others think on the subject.



Date

Mon 05/22/06, 6:20 am EST

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1303 days ago
Score 2+-
I'm not sure about that... I know that there are lots of fans of the game, irrespective of the numbers playing it. I do think that Europe has a lot to offer in the NHL, and your idea would work if their was for example, a European Conference and a North American Conference, so Interconference games, and hence travelling costs, would be limited. Also, a Europe v North America All-Star Game would have more passion than a West v East All-Star Game, a bit like the Ryder Cup in Golf. Involving Europe would help the European audience see more of their players. Now, a Canadian can see Sakic a few times a year, but a Russian will never see Ovechkin. Also, more people would want to see a Stanley Cup between a European side and a North American side, as there will be no neutrals. It would help develop markets in Britain, France, Austria, Ukraine etc. So if moving to Europe is good, and they will only stay in America if it's going to be good, I predict a rosy future for the NHL whatever it does. If it doesn't go into Europe, it will end up like cricket in England - a game that everyone wants to know who's won, but not go and see. The NHL seem to be trying to help the situation with their rule changes, so I think that everything will be fine in the future.
Permalink | Reply
Patrickburke1980All-American
1303 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm not sure if that's going to work logistically, but I definitely like the idea. I personally wouldn't watch, but then again I'm not a big hockey fan. However, it makes sense and I'm sure the Europeans would love it. But, do you honestly see the NHL taking such a massive financial hit for completely overhauling the league? Is there precedent in any other sport on this matter?
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1303 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm neither a hockey nor soccer fan, and I think part of it is because I don't have the ability (on TV) to see things occuring away from the puck/ball -- and those things matter a lot to gameplay. It's true in football, too, but the stop-and-go aspect of football allows for copious replays and different angles, so you get to see the blocking of the linemen and the route-running of WRs.
Permalink | Reply
ChachiOSUDraft Pick
1303 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm not the biggest hockey fan (although it is growing on me now that I work at a "hockey" bar), but I took a quick look at attendance numbers from the 2003-04 season and this years season. Despite coming off an ugly lockout, attendance was up this year by 1 million fans. According to ESPN.com's attendance records the 03-04 season had a total attendance of 19,854,841. This season those numbers jumped to 20,854,839. Now I know theses aren't the most accurate of figures, but it looks, atleast for this past year, that there has been renewed interest in the NHL.
Permalink | Reply
Madproof9Red-Shirting
1303 days ago
Score 3+-
Chachi is correct, attendence this year was almost at an all-time high. Small market teams are doing good, too. Sure, the big market teams (New York, Detroit, Chicago) will always seem to have more support, but you can go to almost any small-market hockey city and find interest. The Carolina Hurricanes are in the Eastern Conference finals for the second time in 4 years (hockey years, 5 years total). Buffalo, while it isn't a small-market, is not a huge market either. They have support for every game. Edmonton isn't even a big market team. Edmonton is one of the worst-off teams financially, and they still pull a crowd. In fact, all the canadian teams are worse off, because they take in income in canadian dollars, and pay out salaries in american dollars, they lose money every game, yet they still have a huge following. The new NHL is working. ESPN is rumored to pick up some games next year, and a couple of years from now, hockey will be back up there.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_future_of_the_NHL"

This page was last modified 11:24, 22 May 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise