armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The USNMT is only as good as it's defense

12
Vote

by Foolsgold

At the 2002 World Cup held in Korea and Japan, the US lost in the quarter-finals to eventual finalist Germany. It was their best finish since 1930, when the tournament featured only thirteen teams and the US won their group only to lose in the semis. Was it an amazing run of luck or were the US squad really that good?

Well, first they were placed in the 'Group of Death' with hosts South Korea, a loaded Portugal side that featured Luis Figo and Rui Costa, and Poland which had players from nine different European leagues. The US were considered the 'easy points', and it certainly helped that in their opening match with the Portuguese, that their opponents underestimated them. Because of this, Portugal found themselves down 3-0 by the 38th minute of play, a deficit that proved to large to overcome.

In their next match against the host nation, a Clint Mathis goal in the 24th minute put our boys up 1-0 and even though South Korea equalized with about ten minutes to go in the match, the damage had been done. South Korea than helped us out with a 1-0 win over the unprepared Portugal, meaning that four points were enough to send us through and a 1-3 loss to Poland was meaningless.

In the first round of the elimination matches, the US drew Mexico and promptly sent them packing with a 2-0 defeat of their fiercest rivals. Then they lost to Germany by a respectable 1-0 margin in the quarters, earning the respect of the world in the process.

So maybe it was luck that the Portuguese underestimated both the US and South Korea, but that doesn't take away from the fact that they played relatively well. I think the real reason why the team did so good, was because we had intelligent, experienced players, especially on defense and particularly in the middle.

Our defense back then mainly consisted of Eddie Pope, Jeff Agoos, Tony Sanneh, Frankie Hejduk, and Greg Berhalter. We also had Pablo Mastroeni and of course, Claudio Reyna, as holding/defensive midfielders. The average age of that group? 29. Average amount of International caps going into the World Cup (sans Mastroeni, who was relatively new to the squad and only played due to injury)? 59. A good defense always gives you a chance at winning matches and we had a pretty solid and experienced one.

Since most of those players have retired from international play over the past few years, the US has seen their FIFA ranking fall from a peak of 4 prior to last year's World Cup to the recent valley of 17. Get ready for it to fall even further though.

Yesterday, the US lost their sixth straight match 4-2 to Brazil and over that streak they've used thirteen different players on defense alone: Jay Demerit, Oguchi Onyewu, Steve Cherundolo, Carlos Bocanegro, Heath Pearce, Danny Califf, Jonathan Spector, Jonathan Bornstein, Marvell Wynne, Drew Moor, Bobby Boswell, Jimmy Conrad, and Frankie Hejduk. Thirteen players in six games in a bit extreme and not only does that hurt the chances of them playing better together, how many of these players do you think are good enough for the 2002 World Cup squad?

Well, in my opinion, the only ones that have had enough playing time to prove themselves worthy of making the 2002 squad would be Cherundolo, Bornstein, and, of course, Hejduk, who was on that side. Bocanegra and Onyewu need to be benched until they start using their brains or just dropped completely. They have both shown that they are undisciplined, are always a red card waiting to happen and consistently get caught out of position. It's high time we give other players a chance to gain experience.

I don't care whether it's Califf or Demerit, Spector or Pearce, Wynne or Moor, we need to figure out a solid group of defenders and stick with them. The Copa America fiasco was just stupid and wasteful, if we aren't going to continue to use players from those squads, what was the point? I also feel that if Gooch and Bocanegra's play are representative of their coaching, then a change at that level should be made.

The only positions the US team seems to be progressing at is midfield. Feilhaber, Bradley, Beasley, Mastroeni, Donovan, and the ever versatile Dempsey, are the cream of the US crop, but it's futile if our defense has more holes in it than a Roman aqueduct. Seriously, I didn't expect us to beat Brazil yesterday, but Bocanegra and Onyewu were running around like two chickens who just had their heads cut off.

Originally posted here


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
816 days ago
Score 2+-
Very good write up, I do agree with the fact that the US defenders need to be more disciplined. I am hopeful that coach Bob Bradley is going through the process of sorting out who should be our backline whenever qualification starts for South Africa.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
816 days ago
Score 3+-
Good analysis. But I thought the Group of Death in 2002 was Sweden, England, Argentina, and Nigeria.
Permalink | Reply
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
816 days ago
Score 1+-
Yeah that was one very tough group.
Permalink
FoolsgoldVarsity Captain
816 days ago
Score 1+-
Ever find it funny that England is always in the 'Group of Death'? They were both equally hard groups in the end and in retrospect, you'd have to say that the US' group was bit more so, as the favorites failed to advance. Going in, no doubt, that group looked tougher.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
816 days ago
Score 1+-
Well, South Korea had a surprisingly impressive run that year. And Poland has only recently qualified for major tournaments after a mediocre decade in the 90s. You put England and Argentina in a group, it will look tough. Throw in Sweden and Nigeria and it becomes...DEADLY
Permalink
JgiuffraDiv-I Stud
815 days ago
Score 0+-
Both Figo and Rui Costa were past their prime in 2002 and the Portugese are notorious for playing poorly in the big tournaments...as are the Spanish. England's group was certainly more deadly.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
816 days ago
Score -1+-
I like this article, I've often wondered what happens to the US in 2002 if Chris Armas who had been the stronghold gaurdian of the US Defense and was the always starting in the center of the park hadn't of torn his ACL. Pablo filled in very well and I don't believe that Armas was ever recalled to the senior squad. I think the US was in the 2nd toughest group in 02 and u can't ignore that they would of had 7 pts in the group if it weren't for Jeff Agoos constantly blundering. Gooch has to be dropped becuase Boca is the Capt. so we should just but DeMerit and Conrad around him and call it a day. You missed the point that we still lack a world class finisher but we have to wait til January camp for Jozy Altidore to start that path so we'll see in time.
Permalink | Reply
IbeargRed-Shirting
816 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm definitely with you on this point... Give Jozy a chance!
Permalink
FoolsgoldVarsity Captain
816 days ago
Score 1+-
Well, LA, I wasn't really writing a Brazil-US match review, I was just making the point that we need to find consistent, disciplined defenders, so talking about a world class finisher wouldn't have really fit in. In that regard though, Jozy is no where near that level(world class) and never will be unless he goes to Europe to get a few years with the big boys under his belt. Even after that, it's not guaranteed he'll ever be that good. As for now, Dempsey is a better finisher than him and is really only coming into his own at 24. He's still got three years before he hits his peak.
Permalink
IbeargRed-Shirting
816 days ago
Score 1+-
Dempsey is very good, but it's unclear whether striker is really his best position. However i don't think anyone is trying to replace him...but i think Jozy could be an upgrade over Wolf or Johnson or Twellman who have done little for the US and two of those three play in the MLS as well.
Permalink
FoolsgoldVarsity Captain
816 days ago
Score 0+-
Amen, Ibearg, Johnson and Twellman are definitely wastes of space and honestly, if we're going to use someone as old as Josh Wolff, I'd rather see Clint Mathis, who's probably the most underrated player we've got. Whether or not he would ever get a call-up or if he would accept, who knows. Also, I agree, Dempsey and Altidore seem like they would complete each other nicely up front. I like Dempsey as a deep lying forward more than a midfielder only because the more he touches the ball the better he seems to get.
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
816 days ago
Score 0+-
I disagree about Johnson, it's Beasley I can't stand.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
816 days ago
Score 0+-
Altidore and Adu was deadly in the U-20 World Cup, what could happen in the senior team?
Permalink
MECUVarsity
815 days ago
Score 0+-
This might be a good article if I knew what USNMT means. Sounds like a Division II college: University of Southern North Montana.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_USNMT_is_only_as_good_as_it%27s_defense"

This page was last modified 17:04, 10 September 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise