armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The Green Bay Packers must add Larry Johnson

15
Vote

by user The Beast

Also published at...

Okay, “must” may be a little bit too strong of a word, but the Green Bay Packers would be making a big mistake by not trading for the Kansas City Chiefs' disgruntled running back, Larry Johnson.

Last season, Johnson led the Chiefs to a 9-7 record and a playoff birth in the tough AFC conference. He was the team’s go-to guy and shouldered much of the offensive burden. Outside of Johnson, the Chiefs were a collection of average offensive players. They were quarterbacked by the inexperienced Damon Huard and the veteran Trent Green. Both players struggled throughout the season, failing to average more than 200 yards passing per game. The receiving corpse was also average as it was headed by Eddie Kennison and Samie Parker. Together, they just combined for 6 touchdowns and 1,421 receiving yards. By comparison Green Bay's number one receiving target, Donald Driver, was five yards shy of 1,300 yards and also pulled in eight touchdowns. With Johnson in the backfield the Cheifs' offense was 2nd in the AFC West in total offense and points per game. Its clearly evident that the Chiefs were truly dependent on Johnson. Without him, their offense would have been horrific.

If you compare the Packers and the Chiefs without Johnson, the Packers easily have the better offense. Brett Favre had more passing yards than both Damon Huard and Trent Green. Favre also had the same number of passing touchdowns as Huard and Green. At receiver, Donald Driver, alone, produced more touchdowns than the Chiefs' top two receivers, Kennison and Parker. As a team, the Packers averaged more yards in total offense last season than the Chiefs did.

Imagine how much more success the Packers could have with the addition of Johnson at running back. Last season, the Packers were ninth in total offense, but 25th in scoring. Why? It was simply a result of being one of the NFL's worst teams in the red zone. To help improve their red zone efficiency, the Packers could use a workhorse at running back with a nose for the end zone. Johnson clearly provides this as he scored seventeen touchdowns in 2006. With Johnson lining up in the backfield the Packers would cure their biggest problem of 2006, red zone efficiency.

So why not give up a first round pick or two for the disgruntled running back? With Johnson, the Packers could turn into a Super Bowl contender overnight. Crazy you say, but not if you think about it. If Johnson was good enough to lead the Chiefs to the playoffs in the AFC, you have to think he could lead the Packers to the Super Bowl in a really weak NFC. The Packers have a much better offense than the Chiefs even if Kansas City does have Johnson. Bringing him to Green Bay could make the Packers' offense one of the best in the NFC. The defense is slowly improving and with a top three NFL back lining up in the backfield you would have to feel pretty confident about the Packers' chances of winning the George Halas Trophy.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
888 days ago
Score -2+-
Forget LJ. The Green Bay Packers must show Brett Favre the door! The Pack will not go anywhere as long as Favre is around.
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
888 days ago
Score 0+-
I have heard this before. No sense telling you that you're wrong.
Permalink
TylersaltAll-Star
888 days ago
Score 2+-
man, I think that every team (except maybe San Diego) would be made better by getting Larry Johnson.
Permalink | Reply
The BoltSoccer Kid
888 days ago
Score 3+-
Personally, I really like having LT.
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
888 days ago
Score 0+-
Selfish little booger!
Permalink
Simms1156Div-I Stud
888 days ago
Score 0+-
personally I think LJ is way over rated. GO ahead and disagree with me the fact of the matter is that LJ gets the ball more than anyother runningback in the leaugue so it is only natural that he gets as many yards. I think if Westbrook or Gore or Jackson got as many carries as him they would SURPASS his production. I think the Packers would be a better team with LJ but they have a serious void at the runningback position, however: I dont think the asking price and the value of LJ will match up.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
888 days ago
Score 3+-
Overrated yes, but better than the other running backs we have.
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
887 days ago
Score 1+-
Yah, I'd take him over Vernan Morency and Brandon Jackson.
Permalink
CoreyisarealboyMajor Leaguer
887 days ago
Score 0+-
Making a trade for LJ would completely ruin the article I published here a couple days ago, and you know what, I'm entirely OK with that. Ted Thompson and I would become best friends.
Permalink | Reply
WrmjrRed-Shirting
887 days ago
Score 0+-
Signing LJ would be an interesting move, and one that would indicate that the Packers are in a "win now" mode. I don't think that is the mode they are in, though. I think they are rebuilding, despite what they might be telling Favre. My guess is that if we see the Packers make any moves at all, it will be for less established talent and draft choices rather than big stars at mid-career.
Permalink | Reply
James CSoccer Kid
887 days ago
Score 0+-
I think the Pack are far more likely to sign Corey Dillon, or trade for Michael Turner. Less tread on the tyres, and you could probably pickk him up for a 1st in '08 and a 3rd in '09. Johnson is a great player, but he wants to be paid a fortune and the Cheifs aren't going to take much less than two first round picks.
Permalink | Reply
Simms1156Div-I Stud
887 days ago
Score 0+-
Like I said LJ is easier better than any Packer runningback but is it really worth what would probably amount to two first round picks for an above average runningback?
Permalink | Reply
LetstalknflWaterboy
887 days ago
Score 0+-
My only brief gripe is that you didn't mention Tony Gonzales. While he has declined, he's still an elite TE, and worth noting. I think that Green Bay would benefit greatly from LJ, but take a good look at Brandon Jackson... he kind of reminds me of a shiftier Ahman Green...
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
886 days ago
Score 0+-
Let's face it, there will be no more significant moves made before training camp...George Koonce is not qualified to make assumptions about what the front office is considering (he was director of player development!). Just as coaches motivate players to become better, the front office motivates coaches to do their jobs, too. The Packers might be pushing the panick button a little bit after they found out in OTA's that once again their tight ends suck, but don't expect much to actually happen.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
885 days ago
Score 0+-
larry johnson is my idol and have been for a long time.johnson is not over rated if anything hes under rated.I think it would be good if LJ get off the cheifs they are not treating him right'it doesnt matter where he goes just get off the cheifs.
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
882 days ago
Score 0+-
When was the last time a marquee running back was on a Super Bowl winner? Isn't there a trend in the NFL that shows the expensive, go to guy running back isn't worth the investment? More teams are going to the RBBC approach. I like LJ a lot, but I don't think he's worth the investment.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #3
879 days ago
Score 0+-
The Broncos Terrell Davis, Rams Marshall Faulk, Steelers Jerome Bettis? They all occured in the past decade and the Colts and Patriots have won four of the last 10 and are pass-first offenses. Add Super Bowl losers and you have Shawn Alexander, Tiki Barber and Brian Westbrook. What point are you trying to make?
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
871 days ago
Score 0+-
My point is that you had to go back to 1999. Davis won his Super Bowls in 1997 and 1998 and Faulk won his in 1999.

I don't consider the 2005 version of Bettis to be a feature back. He had 110 carries for 368 yards. He was sharing the backfield with Willie Parker, who was the teams leading rusher that season.

I don’t watch them but I don’t consider New England to be a pass first offense. Using conventional statistics (because I can’t remember the actual games), New England ranks as follows:

2001 21st in Passing and 13th in Rushing

2003 8th in Passing and 27th in Rushing

2004 13th in Passing and 7th in Rushing

It looks to me that BB just goes with what works. Sometimes pass oriented, other times he focuses on the run.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_Green_Bay_Packers_must_add_Larry_Johnson"

This page was last modified 22:51, 26 June 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise