armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The Forgotten Home Run

22
Vote

by user

Harold Friend

LouGehrig

Sometimes a great accomplishment is overshadowed by a greater accomplishment. Sometimes, an individual is remember for a negative, which obliterates the memory of a wonderful positive. Such is the case with Loren Dale Mitchell, an excellent outfielder and fine hitter for the Cleveland Indians and briefly, for the Brooklyn Dodgers.

Dale Mitchell hit the home run that clinched the 1954 American League pennant for the Cleveland Indians. When the Indians beat the Tigers on September 18 by a score of 3-2, the New York Yankees streak of five consecutive pennants and five consecutive World Championships ended.

At the time of the game, the Tribe led the Yankees by a comfortable 8 games, so it is almost certain that if the Indians had lost that game, it would only have postponed the inevitable, but it is not widely known that one of Dale Mitchell's 41 career home runs won a pennant.

What is synonymous with Dale Mitchell is a called third strike that Mitchell claimed, to his dying day, was a ball. Mitchell was a tough hitter to strike out, ranking as the fifteenth most difficult batter to strike out in the history of the game. He averaged only 1 strikeout for every 33.5 at bats, but all that is usually remembered is that he was the batter Don Larsen struck out to end his perfect World Series game.

When the game was over, Yogi Berra insisted that the pitch was a strike, but Mickey Mantle, like Mitchell, thought it was off the plate for a ball. While Berra was closer to the pitch than Mickey, he wasn't closer than Mitchell. The umpire who made the call was Babe Pinelli, a great umpire who announced that he would retire after the Series.

Babe had been an infielder during the 1920s and was an umpire from 1935 until 1956. He was considered one of the top arbiters in the game, working many World Series, All-Star games, and the 1946 playoff series between Brooklyn and St. Louis, which really was a playoff series since only a tie between teams after 154 regular season games could produce a playoff series. Pinelli was the crew chief for the 1952 and 1956 Series.

Many in the media believe that the called third strike was Pinelli's final game but since the Series went seven games, he umpired two more games. A source as scholarly and "accurate" as the New York Times, stated in his obituary that "In the final act of his umpiring career, Mr. Pinelli called Dale Mitchell of the Brooklyn Dodgers out on strikes to end the only perfect game in Series history. He retired after that game." Don't believe everything you read.

No one really knows if Larsen's last pitch were a strike, but since the home plate umpire called it a strike, it was a strike. What would have happened if QuestTec were available? A better question is, "If technology instead of humans is used in the future to umpire games, would the Dale Mitchell of the future be called out on strikes?"

References

http://www.baseball-reference.com/m/mitchda01.shtml

http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/chronology/1954SEPTEMBER.stm#day18

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/ABpSO_career.shtml

http://www.travel-watch.com/donlarsen.htm

http://www.vintagesportsshoppe.com/postwarmisc.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babe_Pinelli

"Babe Pinelli, Former Umpire; Called Larsen Perfect Game." New York Times 25 October 1984.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1084 days ago
Score -1+-
Nice article LouGehrig! First off, I don't believe ANYTHING the NY Times says anymore. Once a great, objective, investigative newspaper it has become another biased media source. Secondly, I would never replace umpires with technology, that is part of baseball and it works fine. I would hate to see the day, we are subjected to lengthy delays to look at catches, tags, or balls/strikes.
Permalink | Reply
JoshkrossDraft Pick
1084 days ago
Score 0+-
So if Fox News said it, it would be ok? Surely, you don't think the NYT has bias problems in the Sports section. OOOH, It's not the final game? Must be a liberal conspiracy!
Permalink
LouGehrigRed-Shirting
1084 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree completely. The game is played by humans and must be judged by humans. Errors are part of living. We make them, players make them, and we must have human umpires who make them. I would rather get a speeding ticket from a LEO who judged my speed than from a radar gun.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1084 days ago
Score 0+-
actually joshua the nyt as lougehrig stated is biased. there is a definite bias against the yankees. why? because of all the harvard liberals who have positions of power there now. do some research before you are so quick to shout someone down. ooops, like the liberal ny columbia students do to conservative speakers. haha. the nyt hates the yankees because of these new "intellectual" new england liberals that have infiltrated this paper. and yes, it does effect the sports pages!!! they hate the yankees and don't like to see when the yankees are dominant. to answer your question, is foxnews biased? of course just like ALL media outlets. the funny thing is that liberals don't notice the bias in cbs, nbc, abc, cnn, nyt, la times, msnbc, cnbc, bbc, etc.
Permalink
LouGehrigRed-Shirting
1084 days ago
Score 0+-
Actually, the NY Times has a definite, obvious bias in its sports section. So do most newspapers and most other media outlets. The NYT supports the Mets more than the Yankees, but because they purport to be superior to most fans, they couch their bias in ways that are not always obvious. I can support that accusation but do not have the time to do the research. See. I just did what the NYT often does. Ever listen to Jack Buck's son do a Yankees or Mets game? He does not favor the Mets over the Yankees. He hates them both. So much for Fox Sports.
Permalink | Reply
JoshkrossDraft Pick
1084 days ago
Score 0+-
That's what I get for not reading the NYT sports section I guess. Joe Buck sucks, in general.
Permalink
The sharkDraft Pick
1084 days ago
Score 0+-
As always, great work.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1082 days ago
Score 0+-
Joshua-not sure if you saw the NEW YORK times....guess who they put on their front page on the internet? you guessed it a boston player, the new japanese pitcher. why would this guy be on the COVER of this paper? not even in the sports section? goes to my prior comments that you have a lot of liberal boston mgmt in the nyt today...
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_Forgotten_Home_Run"

This page was last modified 20:57, 11 December 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise