armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The Broad Street Bullies are NOT Back

14
Vote

by Bberg11

From my Blog, The Lazy Athlete

With 47 games in suspensions during the first 10 games of the season, the Philadelphia Flyers are beginning to regain the reputation created by the 1970s version of the team. Or at least that's what seems to be the prevailing line of thinking outside of the Tri-State area. I suppose it's only natural that if you see three big hits resulting in injury, you conclude that these Flyers are making a conscious effort to get back to mean, physical hockey. However, the situation deserves closer examination before a conclusion is made.

All three suspensions that make up that number of 47 can be classified as isolated incidents. First, let's get to the one "hit" that can't be defended. The Jesse Boulerice stick attack has no place in the game, and the Flyers quickly, and rightfully, cut ties with him by placing him on waivers. The other hits were just that: hits, and therefore immediately lose all connection with Boulerice's assault. The first hit, by Steve Downie, was an example of a young player who needs to learn how to control his body while on the ice. Had he not launched his body at Ottawa's Dean McAmmond, it would've been a clean hit replayed on ESPN over and over. But, he did launch himself, and therefore deserved the punishment.

That brings us to the most recent incident involving a Flyer injuring an opposing player. It happened during Saturday's 2-1 win in Boston, when Randy Jones ran Patrice Bergeron into the boards behind the Flyers' net. Bergeron didn't get up from the hit and was carted off, but did regain consciousnesses and movement in his extremities after the game. Jones followed Bergeron down the wing, and then behind the net. Jones, like any defenseman, had to assume the forward would continue around the net. When Bergeron put on the brakes, he put himself in a vulnerable position, and Jones took advantage and drove him into the boards. Bergeron toppled forward, and his head just about went through the dasher. Jones was given a five minute major penalty for boarding and a game misconduct.

Jones, owner of zero major penalties in his NHL career, was extremely apologetic and remorseful for the hit. There was simply no intent to injure, and that combined with his history of Gandhi-esque non violence, surely played into his punishment of a two game suspension. The hit was definitely illegal, and he deserved to be kicked out of the game. No matter what your intent, you have to be in control of your body. But, when handing out a suspension, intent has to be the main factor. Not results, as is too often the case in the over-reactive NHL.

Back to the Broad Street Bullies. During the Flyers' championship years in the mid-seventies to early eighties, the organization did seek out players that could not only beat you, but also beat you. But, they continued to get away from that type of play as the game changed throughout the eighties and nineties. And when the game really changed after the lockout, in favor of quicker more skilled players, the changed even more. But as evidenced by last season's record, they didn't change enough. And as the story goes, the Flyers retooled and are now a force in this young season.

The Flyers organization can not, and should not, be blamed for these acts as an attempt to bring back the Broad Street Bullies. The most vicious of the acts was quickly taken care of by cutting Boulerice. Randy Jones is obviously not a player that would make a Flyers team from the mid-seventies. And that only leaves Steve Downie, who is a recent high draft pick, with a history of aggressiveness to match his talent. He is still young, and there is time for the organization to round the rough edges. He should not be given up on yet.

All three acts were isolated, no matter how vicious or benign you consider them. It does not make any sense to accuse a team that made a complete 180 shift toward speed and skill, in order to compete in the "new" NHL, of Bullying up their squad. And, all the worst, all this talk about a few unfortunate incidences is taking away from an amazing turnaround being performed by the Philadelphia Flyers.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
JuTMSY4Legend
612 days ago
Score 2+-
the only people who seem to be suggesting randy jones wanted to injure Bergeron are Claude Julien (B's coach) and scott Burnside (ESPN doucehbag)... I'd be willing to be that had the flyers not had issues with Boulerice or Downie...Jones would be suiting up thursday...
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
612 days ago
Score 1+-
"willing to bet"
Permalink
Bberg11Varsity
611 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree. Too often the NHL puts too much stock in things like that. They are way too reactive in everything they do
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
611 days ago
Score 0+-
I sort of agree. I think Julien is coming from a slightly different place. Jones lined up Bergeron when he had his back turned, it was not a bang bang play where Bergeron turned at the last minute. I think Julien is reading intent into the fact that Jones' really has no excuse for laying that hit. At the same time, I agree that while it was an illegal and, in my opinion, vicious hit, it does not make Jones a dirty player in the same league as Boulerice.
Permalink
Cougar2000All-American
612 days ago
Score 0+-
They will catch some major hell for this, I can promise you. There is going to be some team in the NHL that will be waiting to knock the ever-living hell out of the Flyers and when they do, they will be the mouse that not only roared, that mouse will be a screaming banshee. These are the new Broad Street Bullies. It's one thing to be agressive on ice... when you start taking stupid penalties, that makes the chances of winning that much smaller.
Permalink | Reply
LaredosliderJV Squad
612 days ago
Score -3+-
phuck philly
Permalink | Reply
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
612 days ago
Score 0+-
You still can't be a-holes.
Permalink | Reply
Bberg11Varsity
611 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm glad you guys didn't actually read what I wrote. That's ok, let me summarize for the intelligence challenged out there. The Flyers are not trying to bring back a Bully attitude to their team. These were three acts there were either accidental or overblown. And in the case of Boulerice, no one is defending his actions, which is why he doesn't have a team anymore.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
611 days ago
Score 0+-
i'm not sure its such a terrible thing...

Cougar tried to allude to the fact that other teams will want to hit them back...but...that didn't happen in the 70s, what makes you think it would happen now...

I think that some teams will take it as a wrap that the flyers are bullies...that's fine if the flu also comes back...

Nice Laredoslider...now we know how rangers fans feel...talk to me when your team is .500...
Permalink
Steel TownDraft Pick
611 days ago
Score 0+-
Just cause people don't agree with you doesn't mean they didn't read the article. Philly still plays a physical brand of hockey. Outside of Boulerice that's all that is going on. Downie and Jones both commited penalties but that happens sometimes. The fact is, some people see physical hockey in Philly and they say Broad Street Bullies. Philly will never live down the reputation. But who cares, tough, physical hockey seems to be a winning system. Embrace it.
Permalink
Bberg11Varsity
611 days ago
Score 0+-
I've got nothing wrong with physical hockey, which I do feel the Flyers play, and have played for decades. But fans, and I bet the team, take offense when everyone is calling their efforts to get better dirty. And I'm sure the players and coaches take offense when it is implied that they care more about hurting somebody than puting the puck in the net.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
611 days ago
Score 0+-
Why don't we just call it like it is. The Flyers have improved their top 2 lines of skill players. Thus far, their 3rd and 4th lines have been skating around trying to take out the other teams best players. I can't excuse the thugs they have on the 3rd and 4th lines because they added some offense in the offseason. So lets split the difference. the Flyers have 2 lines of "new" NHL players, and 2 lines of "Broadway Bullies."
Permalink
Bberg11Varsity
611 days ago
Score 0+-
You are simply wrong about the third and fourth lines. The Flyers have exactly two forwards who look to hit before score: Eager and Cote. How can you say they have two lines worth, or six players, who are Broad Street Bullies. By improving your top lines, that means that players you had there previously are now playing on the bottom lines, where they belong. You can't just improve the top two lines, and the bottom two lines stay the same.
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyAAA-er
611 days ago
Score 1+-
While I really would love to see the Flyers always in last, I agree with your well written article. Three incidents which I believe are not related. The proper action was taken in the Boulerice case. I remember the original Broad Street Bullies, that wasn't hockey, that was organized gangland violence.
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
611 days ago
Score 0+-
I think some of your arguments fall flat. The Flyers SIGNED Boulerice even after he was suspended for an entire season in the OHL and CRIMINALLY PROSECUTED for swinging his stick in a similar incident and almost killing an opposing player DURING A PLAYOFF GAME!!!!! And I am supposed to dance a jig becuase the Flyers put the guy on waivers after he did the same thing in the NHL? They didn't do it out of principle. They did it becuase they needed the roster flexibility. And they used that roster flexibility to give playing time Riley Cote, another guy who is simply an English Soccer Hooligan that the Flyers found skates to fit.

The rest of my thoughts on the subject can be found in my article on the subject.

http://www.a...nother_Flyer
Permalink | Reply
Bberg11Varsity
611 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree that the FLyers probably never should have signed Boulerice with his history. But players with questionable histories are signed by teams in all sports all the time because they hope they can turn them around. Signing him is not exactly solid evidence that the team hopes he will continue his idiotic ways so that the Broad Street Bullies can return. He did something stupid, and they got rid of him. There are other players who used their sticks inappropriately who still found jobs with new teams. So how come the Flyers get criticized for signing one, and not those teams?
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_Broad_Street_Bullies_are_NOT_Back"

This page was last modified 15:06, 30 October 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Bberg11 | October 30, 2007 | October 2007

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise