armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

The Art of Platooning: How it Could Effectively be Employed by the Blue Jays

12
Vote

by user Mark w (Originally published on March 15, 2006 at http://www.bluebirdbanter.com)

For the most part, platoons aren't employed nearly as often as they should be. Last season, for example, Eric Hinske totaled 88 at-bats against left-handed pitchers last season. In those at-bats, he posted a putrid line of .170/.215/.330. Against right-handed pitchers, on the other hand, he posted a much better line of .283/.358/.452 in 389 at-bats. To be fair, manager John Gibbons did bench him against a good number of lefties, but it's inexusable -- not to mention very detrimental to the team's success -- to grant him even 88 at-bats against them. As a result, it's wise to employ a platoon when a roster includes hitters who historically post contrasting split totals.

Obviously, the manager must take various factors into account before employing one. Not only must he take offensive production into account, but also defensive production and, perhaps even more importantly, the reactions of both the players and the fans. Often, a platoon has a rather negative stigma associated with it; players may view it as a sign of disrespect, while fans may view it as a sign of weakness. If the employment of a platoon were to heighten production significantly, however, the manager should use all the means at his disposal to find a way to overcome those problems.

As of now, it would likely be in the best interest of the Blue Jays to employ platoons at three positions: catcher, left field, and right field.

Catcher

Mol_zaun.JPG

In this case, a platoon would be benefecial because Molina absolutely crushes left-handed pitching but is very vulnerable against right-handed pitching. On the other hand, Zaun has historically performed equally well against both. It must also be noted that his OPS is much more OBP dependent than Molina's. This is important because it results in more runs created. It's easier to increase .001 point in SLG because it functions on a scale of 4.000 vs the OBP scale of 1.000, so one point of OBP is more valuable than one point of SLG (of course, there are much better explanations and studies done on the matter, but that's just a quick approach based on common sense). Secondly, Zaun's significantly higher OBP can be attributed to his high walk rate. Molina's OBP, on the other hand, is extremely dependent on his batting average, which tends to fluctuate much more than a player's walk rate. With that said, Molina projects to get the brunt of the playing time this season, partly because of his reputation and high-priced salary.

Left field

Johnson_catal.JPG

Evidently, the necessity of implementing this platoon is rather obvious. Catalanotto simply isn't productive against left-handed pitchers, while Johnson is noticeably better against right-handed pitchers. John Gibbons will almost surely employ this platoon to begin the season, and it they would be particularly productive if it were penciled in at the top of the lineup in place of the incumbent, Russ Adams.

Right Field

Rios_hinske1.JPG

Due to the additions of Troy Glaus and Lyle Overbay, Hinske quickly became a man without a position. As a result, he's testing the outfield waters (grass?) as a potential platoon partner with the continually underperforming Rios. Interestingly, Rios' production has historically increased against right-handed pitching, but that doesn't render this platoon unwise. One major concern, however, is Hinske's defense in the outfield. He was a subpar defender at third base, but that doesn't necessarily mean it'll translate into the outfield. It's definitely something to keep an eye on throughout the season.

Although they have yet to be fully embraced by managers and fans alike, platoons certainly do have their merits. Even in an economic sense, they're very beneficial to the team that employs them. For instance, last season the Phillies' employed a highly effective centerfield platoon of Kenny Lofton and Jason Michaels, who combined to produce 28 win shares, the second highest total among all NL centerfielders. The best part, however, is that their combined salary was $3,740,908, a definite bargain for the production they provided.


Date

Tue 03/14/06, 10:02 pm EST <pageTools></pageTools>

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1355 days ago
Score 1+-
Don't you think that its hard for a player to platoon? In other words, if a player plays everyday his output would be X. However, if a player platoons, his output would be < X.
Permalink | Reply
Mark w
1354 days ago
Score 0+-
If you mean in terms of momentum, well, you could look at it the other way too. If a left-handed hitter, for example, struggles against left-handed pitching, that negative momentum could carry over to when he faces right-handed pitching. Of course, it's debatable to what extent momentum even exists, so both sides could be rendered moot. If you mean in terms of overall statistics, well yeah, a player's counting stats will decrease, but his rate stats will improve. In the end, the team should only be concerned with the overall production from that position. If using a platoon yields a greater output than using one player, it should certainly be employed.
Permalink | Reply
Awrigh01All-Star
1354 days ago
Score 1+-
I agree that a platooning sometimes works. Bobby Valetine often platooned players when the Mets were good in the late 1990s and 2000. I always wondered, however, if the actual players liked the system, and if over-time they were playing as hard as they could to not platoon, or conversly if they became discouraged. I guess my issue with platooning refers more to the psychological aspects of being a ball-player.
Permalink | Reply
Mark w
1354 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree that the human element plays a big role in this. Not only would the players involved feel disrespected, but they'd suffer in terms of future earnings - platoon players usually don't make nearly as much money as everyday players. In Toronto's case, I think the psychological aspects will play a big role in dissuading John Gibbons from playing Gregg Zaun more often than Bengie Molina. It's kind of a shame when you think about it, but it's part of the game, I guess.
Permalink | Reply
HoopsAddict.com
1354 days ago
Score 0+-
Hinske could barely cover first base... how's he going to play the outfield?
Permalink | Reply
Awrigh01All-Star
1354 days ago
Score -1+-
Its a good point.
Permalink | Reply
Mark w
1354 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah, it could get ugly out there. His terrible infield defense won't necessarily translate into the outfield, but the platoon should be abandoned if it does. If he can't play in the outfield, he'll become the most expensive bench player in the majors.
Permalink | Reply
Juggernaut agmLittle Leaguer
1354 days ago
Score 1+-
It's worth mentioning that righties pitch a large majority of major league innings. Sitting Molina against righties because Zaun's OPS is a measly 30 points higher means that you're asking an aging, mediocre defender to take majority of the ABs at catcher this season. That's a recipe for diminishing returns. </P>

<P/>It's similar with Rios v Hinske. How much does Rios's clearly better defense and potentially still-developing offense weigh against Hinske's apparent decline and doubtful outfield abilities?

<P/> You're clearly right about Catalanotto, though.
Permalink | Reply
Mark w
1354 days ago
Score 2+-
You're underrating Zaun. Like I wrote within the post, Zaun's OPS is more OBP-dependent, and thus more valuable, than Molina's. Defensively, they're quite comparable, as Molina's only real advantage is his throwing arm. And also, Zaun's a much, much better baserunner than Molina. I wrote a comparison between the two, in case you'd like to check it out: http://blueb...7/2233/15370 In the case of Rios versus Hinske, the offensive upgrade is significant enough that they should try it. It's now clear that Rios' impressive 2003 season is an aberration and there are no underlying statistics that suggest he'll improve dramatically anytime soon. Defensively, he's about middle of the pack, which could be much better than Hinske, obviously. If Hinske turns out to be awful defensively, however, I fully agree that they should not platoon him with Rios.
Permalink | Reply
Juggernaut agmLittle Leaguer
1354 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm not a Rios supporter, but if I were a Jays fan, I would choke on my Molson if I saw Hinske in the outfield. But clearly you've put a lot more thought into this than I have. As for Zaun vs Molina, I would just say that Zaun's four years older, and Molina's OBP looks like it was just 10 points below Zaun's last year. And BP projects GZ to be OOB by 2008, while Molina's pushing for that last big contract.
Permalink | Reply
Mark w
1354 days ago
Score 0+-
My OBP comparison was based on the past three seasons (Zaun: .352; Molina: .318). Since Molina's OBP is extremely dependent on his batting average (which tends to fluctuate form year to year), Zaun is much more likely to get on base more consistently.

I agree about Hinske; there's a chance it could get ugly out there (I like how you slid that Molson comment in there, by the way, hahah).

Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/The_Art_of_Platooning:_How_it_Could_Effectively_be_Employed_by_the_Blue_Jays"

This page was last modified 14:26, 15 March 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise