Stephon Marbury Testifies

[1] With New York Knicks head coach Isiah Thomas being accused of Sexual Harassment. Knicks guard Stephon Marbury testifies, because he was a witness.

It's a risk. Who wants to hear Marbury's opinion? A person that thinks dog fighting is a sports! Who calls himself the best point guard in the league, but hasn't proven it yet. Has plans to leave the NBA, and play in Italy.

Why would anybody want Marbury's opinion? He isn't going to say the right thing, because he never does.

He isn't a successful player, and his opinions are worse.

Having him involved in this case, will be a set back for everyone.

(Quote From Yahoo Sports)"It was more of a joke than anything." said by Stephon Marbury. Everything is a joke to him. Even his career in the NBA.

He isn't going to take this serious. Marbury laughed when he first heard about this problem.

Stephon Marbury never had respect for Anucha Browne Sanders. He thought of her as just a regular person, and his respect for her fell even more when this case gotten bigger.

Stephon Marbuy admitted to calling Anucha Browne Sanders a "bitch" over the phone. (Quote From Yahoo Sports)"I didn't have a reason not to like her" said Marbury. That's how Marbury treats women?

Marbury is a person that will disrespect a person with no reason. He even admitted that.

Why bring a person to testifies that probably is involve in illegal activities himself. Remember Marbury drinking and driving, when the police pulled him over.

The way Marbury was acting in this case, he probably was "drunk."

After Marbury was done testifying he said (Quote From Yahoo Sports) "Money makes you do crazy things, man." It sure does, because I'm pretty sure Marbury was acting this crazy before he was in the NBA.

He wasn't a help to anything. Marbury wasn't their when Isiah Thomas and Anucha Browne Sanders had their involvements. If he was, he should have talk about it.

This was nothing but a joke to Marbury, just like his opinion on everything. When this was over, the judge better think twice before having Marbury testify again.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher

ChristofMVP

825 days ago

Score 0

Judge really does not have a say as to whether Marbury can testify. If he can provide relevant testimony, and relevant is defined broadly, then he must be allowe to testify.

Permalink | Reply

Kenrick ThomasVarsity Captain

825 days ago

Score 0

Marbury shouldn't have been on the stand, he doesn't need to be involve!!!

Permalink | Reply

IbeargRed-Shirting

825 days ago

Score 0

I'm just wondering if the opposing council who did not call marbury up, simply played marburys interview on "miked up" as their cross examination or if they bothered to question him.

Permalink | Reply