armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Step up to ruin your franchise

16
Vote

by Suckatsports

Who's next in line to ruin their baseball team for the upcoming 10 years, because Alex Rodriguez is on the market! He may be expensive, but no one does a better job than him in ruining franchises, no one. If you'd like to have your team moribund for the next decade with lasting repercussions for the decade after, Boras has all the information in a tidy pamphlet.

This is not the first time such phenomena has arisen, where almost unanimously the best player on the field is the worst player to have. Alex Rodriguez just this past year will no doubt be named the AL MVP, and for good reason. His stats (.314, 54 HR, 156 RBI) are astronomic, but what is he valuable for? The Yankees have done nothing this year that they haven't done in the past four years, and even less than they've done in the years before, that is win in the playoffs. In fact, while it's counter intuitive that a player on a baseball team with production of such enormous numbers both offensively and defensively would hurt a team, it is in fact a reality. Alex Rodriguez is the anti-winner.

It's more than just a trend of Alex Rodriguez to stunt a team's primary goals (post season success), it seems to be his primary function.

During his seven years in Seattle, they made the playoffs three times, and only advancing to the next round with the help of one Junior Griffey. Taken in itself, this doesn't mean much, seeing as how he only broke into the league in '94 and thus is it was only the beginning of his play.

However, the next stop is certainly the most telling. After signing an astronomical and largest contract in sports history, he went on to the Rangers to put up seemingly unspeakable numbers only to have the team win no more than 73 games. In three seasons, he finished no lower than 6th in the MVP voting (twice in the top 2, winning 1), and first in salary, effectively bleeding dry the well that could bring in players to advance the team. The effects of his stay there are still being felt, because after he was traded, the Rangers are still paying a huge portion of his contract. Still bottom feeders the Rangers are slowly creeping their way back into respectability. Ridding themselves of ARod was the key.

The Yankees brought him into their franchise in a move based just as much on his talent as not letting the Red Sox get their hands on him. His numbers in New York need not be mentioned as they have little to no bearing on team success, as do his MVPs (2005, estimate: 2006). What should be mentioned, is that in his time the Yankees have advanced in the playoffs only once (2004) and have continually dropped in winning percentage culminated this year by not winning the division. Not to mention the greatest collapse of all time, losing a three game lead, was participated in by the one and only, golden child of baseball.

Three years, three similar outcomes. His skill at the plate and in the field is unquestioned, but team results surely create some clout. His post-season numbers aren't entirely embarrassing, but one can't remember a game where his hit was timely and important. There is one place that he does help a team, and that's when he leaves. Seattle and Texas picked up 15 and 18 games respectively in the win column a year after he left including a franchise record 116 wins and a trip to the ALDS for the Mariners. Coincidence? I think not. Look for the Yankees to mirror these stats if they don't bring him back.

So who's next? Anyone think they've had too much success lately that would like an albatross around their proverbial team success?

Alex Rodriguez Stats [Baseball Reference]

This post is cross-published from We Suck at Sports.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DonatevoMajor Leaguer
762 days ago
Score 3+-
But he only ruins it in the postseason.
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
762 days ago
Score 2+-
A-Hole will be in LA.
Permalink | Reply
SuckatsportsVarsity
762 days ago
Score 2+-
Only made the post season three times outside New York, and all those were in Seattle with Griffey.
Permalink | Reply
Kwitt11Varsity Captain
762 days ago
Score 4+-
During his seven years in Seattle, they made the playoffs three times, and only advancing to the next round with the help of one Junior Griffey. Nice thought...but the Mariners made it to the ALCS with A-Rod in 2000, when Griffey wasn't on the team. A-Rod hit .371 with two doubles and two HRs in the playoffs that year.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
762 days ago
Score 0+-
116 wins...118 maybe...ridiculous season...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
762 days ago
Score 4+-
JuTMSY4, the Mariners won 116 in 2001, after A-Rod left
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
762 days ago
Score 2+-
whoops!
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
762 days ago
Score 3+-
A-Rod wasn't a detriment to the Yankees, the Yankees have had one problem the last several years that they have not addressed (at least not well) and that is pitching. It isn't a good postseason staff. Sure would be a great one if a few were 10 years younger, but it's 2007 not 1997. They can win the 12-10 slugfests during the regular season but in the postseason that isn't going to happen.
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
762 days ago
Score 3+-
If you want to ruin a team, hire This idiot and This even bigger idiot
Permalink | Reply
Niteowl049AAA-er
762 days ago
Score 2+-
Like the article states signing A-Rod is still hurting the Rangers today even though he hasn't played for them since 2003. A-Rod had his best three consecutive years of his career hitting 52, 57 and 47 home runs while with Rangers. Rangers will never win a championship until they start focusing on pitching instead of on hitter like A-Rod. With Texeria gone only Sosa, Kinsler and Wilerson had at least 20 home runs and only Young and Sosa and Byrd had over 70 RBI's....so now they need hitting and pitching both if they are to compete in 2008.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
762 days ago
Score 2+-
until a-rod opted out, the rangers were still paying a chunk of his salary...
Permalink
Niteowl049AAA-er
762 days ago
Score 2+-
Reggie Jackson never has had to worry about A-Rod becoming the new Mr. October. Lately when the season ended A-Rod should have gone home and let the Yankees play a minor leaguer in playoffs...they could do a lot better than A-Rod has.
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
762 days ago
Score 2+-
A-Hole is Ms. August.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
762 days ago
Score 4+-
You can point to A-Rod and the correlation he has with team's losing, then use his crappy playoff numbers as evidence to support the theory that A-Rod causes teams to get worse. However, all those teams had another, more important, thing in common other than having A-Rod: They all had crappy pitching. The Rangers staff was a joke. Their offense was very good, but they couldn't win games without scoring 5 or 6 runs. The Yankees have been similar in the A-Rod era. Kevin Brown, Kei Igawa, Carl Pavano, Randy Johnson, need I go on? Is A-Rod a detriment to whatever team he goes to? Maybe. But bad pitching is definitely a bigger detriment.
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
762 days ago
Score 1+-
St. Roger, Andy Petite, Mariano Rivera, Mike Mussina, etc. are crappy pitchers?
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
762 days ago
Score 2+-
Clemens was 6-6 with a 4.18 ERA, he pitched a grand total of 99.0 innings. That's not bad, but it's hardly good, and it's not good when you average less than 6 IP per start.

Pettitte had a very good season, but Mike Mussina was really bad. In the 152 innings he threw, he had a 5.15 ERA and a WHIP of 1.467.

Rivera had a good year, but the fact that he only had 34 save opportunities on a team that won 94 games speaks volumes about how and why the Yankees won or lost.

Wang was their best pitcher, Pettitte was solid, but in general, the Yankees staff wasn't very good. They were 17th in baseball in ERA. Only one team with an ERA higher than the Yankees' made the playoffs and that was Philadelphia, who were also eliminated in the first round.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
762 days ago
Score 1+-
One season. What about the others since A-Hole was in NY?
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
761 days ago
Score 1+-
In 2006, the Yankees were 12th in MLB in team ERA. In 2005, they were 22nd. In 2004, they were 19th.
Permalink
WrmjrRed-Shirting
762 days ago
Score 1+-
I agree that pitching is more an issue for all these teams. Now, you can argue that for the smaller market teams like the Rangers, A-Rod's salary made getting good pitchers impossible. Clearly that wasn't the case for the NYY--they just seem to have chosen poorly. If he lands with a large market team (like LA), his salary won't prevent them from signing good pitchers. If they can choose well--and that's a big if--then A-Rod can help that team to success. If not, he can't carry the team all the way to a championship.
Permalink | Reply
The Nigerian NightmareSoccer Kid
762 days ago
Score 4+-
Someone's been listening to too many blow-hards in the sports radio business. The whole A-Rod hurts teams argument is just something provocative that some of the idiots they give sports talk shows use to get other idiots to call and make unsubstantiated claims about A-Rod (although he can rightfully be criticized for not performing in the playoffs lately). Here are the main problems with the argument:

1 - Don't blame A-Rod for signing a fat contract. Without a salary cap, teams overspend every year (hello Gil Meche for 55 mil.). If you are a team with money you can grab A-Rod. If you are the Rangers you are idiotic to sign A-Rod because it paralyzes your efforts to sign anyone else. In other words, this is a fundamental problem in baseball, not an A-Rod problem.

2 - If A-Rod were Boston's SS this year, would they have lost the World Series? I think not.

3 - The Yanks success (or lack thereof) was due to pitching, which is even more important in the playoffs.

Out....
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
762 days ago
Score 1+-
Bad pitching in NY for the past how many years? I doubt it.
Permalink
SuckatsportsVarsity
761 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm not blaming ARod for signing the biggest contracts in sports ever. He wants to make the most money possible, and I can understand that. But is it just a coincidence that the teams that he's been on have under preformed, and that when he leaves they get a lot better? Certainly there's something with the fact that he's there, whether it's a lax mindset from other players because of his skill, or his demanding contract, or maybe the media scrutiny on the team that causes them to fall short of their goals.

You can't tell me the goals of the NYY were making the playoffs this year. And certainly the goals of the Rangers probably were making the playoffs. Both fell short.

He's a really good player, but when he's a quarter of your salary, you're just going to have problems fielding a team, it's just that simple. Something needs to suffer, and if it's pitching like some have suggested, so be it.

By the way, NYY pitching staff? What about the young guns like Phil Hughes and Joba Chamberland? I'd say they're pretty damn good. No excuses.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
761 days ago
Score 2+-
Um, how many innings did Hughes and Chamberlain give the Yankees? As I said in a comment above, the Yankees had the 17th ERA in baseball. As much as I hate A-Rod, it's pitching that wins and loses in the playoffs.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Step_up_to_ruin_your_franchise"

This page was last modified 21:22, 1 November 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise