armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Snubbed? I Don't Think So!

14
Vote

by user JuTMSY4

You heard me right, I’m saying it. Guys, if you didn’t make the all-star squad, especially in the National League you were not snubbed, you just weren’t plain good enough. Wait, you say that they don’t offer your position in this year’s game so you were pushed to the side? I’ve got news for you; try playing an actual position instead of sitting on your butt for 4.5 innings a game. Or wait, you were a victim of the east coast, Boston/New York bias? No you weren’t you’re just not good enough to play for them. Fan voting was instituted because it’s the fans who truly care about the mid-summer classic, and while all-star appearances may be great for your Hall of Fame resume, I just don’t care how many times you were the 3rd best shortstop in the league, per fan voting, it just doesn’t matter.

With that said, there were a few snubs worthy of mentioning. For example, Joe Mauer should be the starter over Ivan Rodriguez, but at least he made it. Or perhaps Justin Verlander who’s league leading 10 wins and welcoming 3.13 ERA make him a strong candidate for the 32nd spot, but when you look at the competition, it’s a lot closer than you think. Perhaps next time Verlander should consider not playing for the AL Central leading Tigers, especially considering they are 2.5 games ahead of AL Manger, Ozzie Guillen’s Chicago White Sox.

And so, without too much anticipation, allow me to recognize those supposed snubs who still do not deserve to go to the all star game.

American League

Jason Giambi

The Giambino is near the top of the major leagues with 24 Home Runs and 63 RBIs and is a bit of a victim of circumstance (You will hear this a lot from me), but also checks in with a very Adam Dunn (Dunn is batting .227 with 26 HRs, which is probably one of the bigger jokes in MLB) like average of .268 (Actually, that’s a bit higher than what Dunn has). Problem here is, AL East compadre David Ortiz has more, of well everything (Home runs, RBIs, Average) and so does Guillen’s Jim Thome. Finally, the only actual First Baseman to beat Giambi out is Paul Konerko who, while only having 20 Home Runs, 4 less than Giambi, has the same amount of RBIs (63) and sports a nice .314 average. Not to mention Konerko actually plays first (74 games to 44 games) and has a solid .996 fielding percentage, versus Giambi’s pedestrial .980.

Travis Hafner

Let me preface this by saying I love Travis Hafner, I think he’s an excellent hitter and his OBP is second only to Joe Mauer in the American League. With that being said, the big issue with Hafner is that he doesn’t play a position, which is very similar to my gripe with Big Papi. Otherwise, I suppose Hafner statistically qualifies for the all-star game, ranking 4th or higher is almost every major offensive stat. Once again, a victim of circumstance, namely that 3 “supposed” first baseman are ahead of him in most of those stats (Namely Ortiz, Thome, and actual first baseball Konerko). As such, If this game were in Detroit, perhaps Hafner is a snub, but as a result of real baseball, such that the Senior Circuit provides, I can see Hafner being undeserving. That’s right, my only reasoning for excluding him is that he doesn’t play the field, but then again, he does take my vote for the 32nd player on the AL squad.

Francisco Liriano

Absolute victim of circumstance. While, I could credit his miniscule 1.99 ERA to his lack of innings pitched, to which he is about 38 behind other ERA leaders, I feel as though having a 1.99 ERA with 80 odd innings pitched is pretty damn good. None the less, while he appears to have all but wrapped up the Rookie of the Year Award in the AL, he may be a little too green for the all-star game, and that’s probably the only thing holding him back. What more proof that he’s a victim. Mark Buehrle make the squad with an ERA almost 2 full points higher and just as many wins, so did defacto pitcher Mark Redman who is self explanatory (By the way, where’s Mike Sweeney, perennially Royals All-star? Batting a cool .176 with 2 home runs, 6 RBIs and collecting 11 million while being disabled). While I think guys like Bobby Jenks are deserving, Jenks is not more deserving than Liriano. So everyone, meet Francisco Liriano, 22 year old screw over.

Interim note here: This is a lot harder than I thought; some of these guys actually deserve to go. For example, is there a chance Jim Thome of Travis Hafner can play second, because no AL second baseman deserves to go for batting something like .315. The AL can have all their good position players, the NL owns second base!

Justin Verlander

First of all, he plays against Ozzie Guillen 18 times a year (He doesn’t, but you get the idea). That already makes him the enemy. On top of that, while his stats are good, there are already players on the roster to match him (and some who are not on) Example: He has 10 wins, but so do 6 other guys and another 7 who have at least 9, namely Liriano who also did it in less games and sports that 1.99 ERA. His 3.13 ERA is good for 4th best in the AL, but only Johan Santana, with a 2.59 made the squad of low ERA pitchers and only 2 of the top 10 and 6 of the top 20 made it. You can have a great rookie year all you want, but if Liriano doesn’t make it, neither do you. And I take back that Rookie of The Year comment about Liriano, this is a lot closer than it looks, especially of Verlander’s team can actually make the post-season.

Tadahito Iguchi & Brian Roberts

First of all, Robinson Cano does deserve some recognition for making the grade at this position, namely because he sports the best average among AL second baseman (.325) and is in the top 10 in every other category. But he’s not going to play, so that leaves manager pick and best 2nd baseman Jose Lopez as the new backup, which is absolutely fair, consider he leads all second baseman Home runs, RBIs and Slugging Percentage. Personally, I don’t think Mark Loretta deserves the start, but he’s having a good enough year, expecially because he’s 2nd in average, OBP, 4th in RBIs and 6th in slugging. That leaves out Iguchi and Roberts, both of whom sport nice averages (.293 & .313 respectively) but Roberts lacks in power (1 HR, 33 RBIs) and has speed (19 SBs), while Iguchi has the power (9 HRs, 38 RBIs) but has little speed (5 SBs). To me, there about equal in value, but Lopez is having a phenomenal year and is making my RoY comment seem even more asinine, and Loretta, as I’ve stated earlier is deserving and did also get the vote. Sorry guys, but you’ll have to try harder next time

Ok, so its hard to make a case of some of these guys not to make it, but that is how the ball bounces. On the opposite note, would someone care to explain to me how Gary Matthews makes it. I know he had that great catch, and is batting .334, but honestly his power numbers are not that spectacular, especially for playing in Texas with guys like Michael Young and Mark Teixeira. Alright, on to the NL snubs:

National League

Carlos Delgado & Nomar Garciaparra

Nomar is leading everyone in the NL in batting with his .361 and a resurgence in his career, while Carlos is 3rd in the NL in home runs (22) and 4th in RBIs (55). Problem here is you’ve got All-World First baseman Albert Pujols in front of you with the 2nd in the league Home run total (27), tops RBI total (72) and nice average (.314), good for second in the NL, all while sporting a great fielding percentage (.996) and missing around 17 games. Meanwhile, last years Rookie of the Year, Ryan Howard, who should be a DH, checks in with a respectable .284 average, leads the world in home runs (28), is 3rd in the NL in RBIs (69) and is second in slugging percentage, only to Pujols. Finally, Lance Berkman pulls in this group with his 22 home runs (3rd) 71 RBIs (2nd) and .319 average (3rd). Bottom line is, you put Garciaparra’s and Delgado’s numbers together and you get Pujols, but you pull them apart and you get Todd Helton and Prince Fielder.

Michael Barrett & Johnny Estrada

If ever the New York/East Coast bias was obvious it was here. Paul Lo Duca has been nothing but average as a catcher this year, namely with his .286 average, 3 Home Runs and 24 RBIs, but he got the vote from the fans. Deserving starter and sophomore backstop, Brian McCann merited his spot .354 average and acceptable power numbers of 5 Home runs and 23 RBIs, especially for a struggling Atlanta Braves squad. Barrett is probably the most deserving, with a .313 average, 9 home runs and 31 RBIs on an equally stinky squad. And Estrada looks just as nice with a .317 average, 6 home runs and 44 RBIs. Nope, the fans just plain got it wrong. McCann deserves the spot and one of these two should have went, I say Estrada, namely for his .998 fielding percentage.

Bobby Abreu

Bobby leads the league in OBP (.444), but otherwise is just a good outfielder and no more deserving than say Pat Burrell. His RBI total ranks him 5th (57), just behind Jeff Francoeur and his home run swing continues to struggle as he is 25th in the NL with just 8. Even his .284 batting average is pedestrian and without power numbers he’s just a Ryan Howard that gets on base instead of slamming them out of the park. Brad Hawpe has better statistics everywhere except RBIs where he’s only about 10 behind and current NL backup Carlos Lee leads Bobby in every category, especially in home runs. Truly in comparison, Abreu is getting beat in almost every category by every player currently in the game (I.E. Bay has more home runs and RBIs, Holiday has more home runs and a higher average, I could go on). Looks like Bobby won’t be back to defend his title as Home Run Queen.

Roy Oswalt

Why wasn’t Roy selected? Easy, he was good, but not that good. What’s surprising is that manager Phil Garner didn’t take him, thanks Coach! Roy is 7th in the NL in ERA, but behind other snubs Chris Young (Who is not on this list because I absolutely think he was ripped off) and non-snubsJason Schmidt. His win total is equal to that of Schmidt at 6, good for a tie of 21st in the league and his K total is 74, good for 23rd. You say his was hurt at one point?! Too bad for you, he comes in with 16 starts this season, just 2 behind a large group of leaders. Sure he ranks 26, but so does Pedro Martinez. Looks like injury time didn’t make a difference. Sorry Roy, just not good enough.

Billy Wagner

So claim that Derrick Turnbow didn’t deserve a spot, but regardless of his 4+ ERA he is second in the NL and saves and that has to count for something. Brian Fuentes is another story, but 15 saves at a Mile High is still pretty good, especially when you compare him to his closest competitor, Billy Wagner who has an equal amount of saves, a higher ERA, and 4 blown saves (Compared to 3 for Fuentes), not to mention a not credited blown save because it wasn’t save situation, but he still got tagged with the loss. Who’s ahead of him? Tom Gordon has more saves, and a lower ERA, as does Trevor Hoffman. Sorry Billy, but all these guys were better than you.

That about wraps up the list. I’m sure there were a few more snubs of note, but I guess they didn’t make the cut. Moreover, this article was a lot harder than I thought, namely my defense of not taking Hafner or Liriano, both of whom are having stellar years and basically got screwed as a result of league rules. But, I guess too much is better than not enough. Now, if the NL can possibly not suck this year, perhaps I may care about the game beyond the 3rd inning.


Date

Mon 07/03/06, 6:17 am EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
1251 days ago
Score 3+-
I think Nomar was snubbed. Everyone else on the list, I agree with. But Nomar, the guy is leading the league in batting. The batting average leader needs to be on the all-Star team.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 2+-
He plays first base. You can't take Pujols off there, or Howard as they are hitting for power at the power position. That leaves him versus Berkman, who checks in with double the home runs and 25 more RBIs, all while batting .320. Sorry Christof, but he just doesn't make the grade...now if he still played short...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
Giambi deserves to be on the team over Konerko. His OPS is 146 points higher then Konerko. Everyone knows batting average is overated for measuring the productivity of a hitter. OPS is a far better indicator and Giambi is the better offensive player season to date.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
Two issues, Giambi didn't play enough games at 1st to qualify as a 1st baseman and OPS is a wasteful stat. You want to go with OBP, ok, but OPS just shows that you can get on base but you hit a lot of power. Besides, the team needs at least one real 1b, and I'd say Konerko's fielding puts him on. Not to mention, i think average is a very important stat. OBP proves you get on base, but you can only walk so many times, you have to put wood on the ball to do any real damage consistantly...
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 2+-
Giambi played less games at first base than Ortiz? 'Cause Ortiz "qualified" as a first baseman.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score -1+-
If you want to include atleast one actual first baseman, i go konerko, 4 less homers but better in almost every other catagory, espcially fielding...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1250 days ago
Score 1+-
Ortiz has played only 7 games at 1B this year as opposed to 44 by Giambi, so I'm not sure how a pure DH was eligable at first. Also, OPS is an excellent indicator of productivity. Please find me a player with 1.000+ OPS who is not having a great season.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
great article. very well done.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 3+-
Fine article, except you forgot to mention any pitchers, several of whom were snubbed. Beckett and Schill probably should have been on; both are ten-game winners, and there were pitchers added who haven't won ten games yet. You can argue against Beckett because of ERA, but picking Buehrle (9-5, 3.86ERA) over Schilling (10-2, 3.54ERA) is clear favoritism, and a good example of why the manager shouldn't be involved in picking the starting pitchcers.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
He did win the WS last year, so I think he's earned the right a little. Beckett clearly doesn't go because of the ERA and he is awful ont he road (5-3, 6.53 ERA). Schill is a different story, but Verlander didn't make it with a 10 win season and neither did Freddy Garcia (4.5 ERA however). Moreover, wins are a little overrated and when you compare 9 game winners as well you can see why liriano has a case and beuhrle, mussina, santana and kazmir make it (Plus kazmir is a devil ray, someone has to go). Schill is just the odd man out and I would take verlander over him...but you have a point...
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
I agree on Buehrle. I knew Guillen was going to go with a little favoritism (he already said he'd pick a lot of his own players for open spots), but I was really surprised to see Buehrle on the team instead of Liriano, Verlander or Schilling. Guillen's other picks I can't disagree with, but that pick was weak.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 2+-
Yeah, that was really a garbage pick. Favortism is one thing, being a dumbass is another. There were lots of other deserving players
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
Funny thing is, in the analysis, commentators were saying how Guillen built a great squad with great matchups, since he has 7 leftys and 5 rightys. 7 leftys. So it's not like he couldn't sacrifice Buehrle for another righty. Liriano is a right-handed pitcher, isn't he?  ;)
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 0+-
One of the things I recall from previous years - and I forget when and who this was, exactly - was Joe Torre adding a Red Sox player over an almost-as-good Yankee one year. That certainly made my already-high opinion of the man skyrocket. Anyone remember who and when this was? Anyway, a good manager will choose the best players, not pick favorites.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm guessing Torre taking Pedro, but i have no idea over who?!
Permalink
The sharkDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 3+-
I agree - especially with Schilling. I believe that Ozzie left him off to retaliate for so many Red Sox being voted on. One more reason to hate Ozzie.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1250 days ago
Score 2+-
Like we needed one.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
Liriano is the best pitcher in the American league. An all-star game with out him is just a "some very good players" game.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 2+-
The guy barely qualified. I would even argue he's not even the best pitcher on his own team. I would not be so fast to declase a rook as the best pitcher in the league...he will be good, but he will come down to earth...
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 2+-
As long as they have the stupid "every team must have a player" rule, that's all the "All-Star" game ever is. Leaving off guys like Schilling so the Kansas City Royals can have a player on the team is insane. MLB should worry less about team's feelings getting hurt; this isn't Little League.
Permalink
The sharkDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 1+-
Best numbers? - maybe. Best pitcher? - no way in hell.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1250 days ago
Score 1+-
Liriano's great, but his presence doesn't make or break the All-Star Game. That's absurd.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1251 days ago
Score 0+-
Oops. I meant for that comment deriding the "every team must have a player" rule to be its own thread. How 'bout we respond to that here instead of under MJD's Liriano comment, huh? :)
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Legend
1251 days ago
Score 2+-
Personally, I like the rule. You don't want to alienate someones favorite team completely. If your a royals fan, you've suffered enough, you deserve something, but the least they could have done is send a player that is actually deserving...redman is a joke...
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1250 days ago
Score 0+-
As long as they have the rule, it's not really an All-Star Game. You really think fans won't watch the All-Star game because there aren't any players from their team on it? I think most people who watch the All-Star game are going to watch it whether there's somebody from their team on it or not. Let's face it, only the dedicated baseball fans really care enough to watch the All-Star Game, and most of those would watch regardless of who's playing.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
1250 days ago
Score 0+-
Sure, but if your a royals fan this is basically your only chance to see someone on your team win a nationally televised game. In fact are any royals games ever on national TV?
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1250 days ago
Score 0+-
Hey, at least they're not the Yankees farm team anymore. Be grateful for small favors. :-)
Permalink | Reply
Twins15Varsity Captain
1250 days ago
Score 0+-
Good stuff. Giambi and Hafner have been 2 of the best hitters in the AL, and Liriano's been a stud in the rotation.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Snubbed%3F_I_Don%27t_Think_So%21"

This page was last modified 15:59, 23 July 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise