armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Skip Bayless Shuns Idea of Barkley as Governor

7
Vote

by user Detroitown

The more Skip Bayless columns I DON'T read, the better off I'll be.

Talk over Charles Barkley's quest for governor of his hometown state, Alabama, has been fired up this week, and it certainly lit a fire under Skip Bayless. It's not even 2010 yet (the year Barkley can be elected for the desired position) and Bayless is ruthlessly criticizing the former NBA player like Marie Barone.

Bayless's first conundrum for Sir Charles deals with his leadership services:

We're talking about Charles Barkley, who did Nike commercials saying, "I am not a role model" …

Skip, the basketball court is far diverse than politics. On the court, Barkley was a fierce competitor. In everyday life, he's a sincere man with ideas and philosophies that would only benefit the citizens of Alabama. Take for example, Barkley is a strong believer in education:

"There are too many black kids and their parents who do not value a good education. There are places where a black kid who is a good student and tries to speak correctly, you hear stuff like, 'He's trying to be white.' Well, I say, if that's true, we need more kids trying to be white."

Once again, the guy cares about the nation's future. What is Skip Bayless doing to improve our nation's well being?

Bayless's columns are exceedingly consisted of critisicms and prejudgments.

We all know Charles Barkley the NBA player. We are all aware of his gambling and his bold statements regarding race, politics, and sports (the three being often intertwined). But the jabs and pokes that Bayless takes in his most recent column is known throughout the world of politics as mudslinging. The defamation of Barkley's character. What Bayless is doing flat-out idiotic. The only reason we may be unsure of Barkley as a politician is because we're going by his reputation alone. We haven't seen Barkley the Governor. We have no information to formulate judgments about him. Reputation is overrated:

"It also isn't at all a stretch to imagine many other African-American athletes or coaches running a state. Magic Johnson would be a phenomenal governor. Grant Hill would be a politician you could trust. So would Tony Dungy or Avery Johnson or Mike Singletary. I could go on and on.."

What do those athletes have that Barkley doesn't? 1. Barkley is passionate about his beliefs and the well-being of his race and the future (children, next generation, etc.). 2. Like it or not, Barkley is a role model, alike to those athletes listed above.

It's clear that Bayless is wary of Barkley's mouth. Sir Charles would have to be a complete and utter moron to talk before he thinks in public.

Skip Bayless is trying to turn an uneducated opinion of a man he doesn't know personally into an ESPN column that only millions will read. His opinions of Barkley are as accurate as anyone elses.

Why?

Because we don't know the political Charles Barkley. Charles seems to have practical ideas for the state of Alabama. Give him a chance, the majority of the population there can only count to ten....ooops!





Date

Fri 07/28/06, 12:30 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 3+-
Actually, the earliest Barkley could run is 2014. He hasn't bought a house in Alabama yet, and the state constitution requires that governors be residents of the state for seven years.
Permalink | Reply
DetroitownLittle Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 1+-
Charles Barkley is once again talking -- dead seriously -- about running for governor of his home state of Alabama in 2010.


tell that to skip bayless...he might care.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 3+-
I know that he is. I saw him on PTI yesterday saying that he didn't get what all the hoopla was about, considering the earliest he could run is 2014.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1226 days ago
Score -3+-
First off, he won't run. He's been saying this governor crap since his days as a Sixer... also, ASwaff, you can have residency in more than one state, but you can only vote in one... how do you think Hilary became a senator in new york? If you want to talk sports/politics, keep it to the REAL candidates, like Lynn Swann...
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 1+-
^ does the 'remember me' function even work?
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 3+-
I understand that, but different states have different residency rules when it comes to running for public office. Barkley isn't a resident of Alabama, because he was talking about needing to buy a home there. And he has to have that home for seven years before he can run.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score -3+-
You don't need to buy a home to declare residency.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
Do you know that that's the rule in Alabama? Because Charles Barkely is under the impression that he needs to buy a home and be a resident of Alabama for 7 years before he can be governor. He said it was in the constitution. Are you certain that he's wrong about Alabama? Again, different states have different rules about residency.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 0+-
He lives in several states, including here in Arizona. He can rent an apartment, or use a relative's address...you don't need to own anything, just pay taxes and register to vote in that state... I don't know about the 7 years thing, but I do know Alabama has had 2 of it's last 4 gov's booted for crimes.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
Yes, different states have vastly different residenecy requirements. Some are fairly strict; some are not, like New York. I know here the "residency" for running for office is much more stringent than just voting and having an in-state address to your name.
Permalink
DetroitownLittle Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
Barkley seems sincere about it. If Arnold Schwarzenegger (don't correct me if I'm wrong, ASwaff) can become elected Governor of California, just think how those hicks in 'Bama could affect this. Now Lynn Swann is a real sports-related governor. Sound choice. I'm surprised Bayless didn't mention him in his rant.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 1+-
btw "politician you can trust" is on the list after "blue leprechauns", "Barry Bonds leading the league in Sacrifice Bunts" and "Cubs-Devil Rays World Series tickets"
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 3+-
I don't understand your fawning over Lynn Swann. I'm never crazy about celebrities running for office, but Charles Barkley seems to sincerely want to make an impact on the political world and to affect the lives of US citizens. He seems to have real purpose beyond his own agenda. I saw Swan interviewed about running, and I really didn't see the same conviction. He didn't seem to have a purpose, other than winning.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score -4+-
1st, I could barely care less, but Swann is a legitimate candidate/sports hero/black republican running in a heated, tight race against a conservative Democrat in a key political state... Gee, why am I fawning about him? Charles is not a serious candidate. He only says he wants to run, because he knows it will ruffle feathers where he's from in L.A. (Lower Alabama). Much as Skip Bayless likes to ruffle feathers by being himself. Controversy sells...
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
Lynn Swann is an empty suit. Give me a break. Every time he speaks I get more and more embarrassed for the Pennsylvania GOP. They so should've been able to dig up a better candidate than Swann.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
I liked Rendell as Mayor of Philly, but I moved before he became GOV...so I don't know how he is now.. he is a 'quality' politician, but is pretty damned hairy...
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 0+-
I agree with Xinoph. Seeing Swann speak is almost as embarassing as seeing Schwartzenegger pretend his earpiece was malfunctioning to avoid discussing issues on national television.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 0+-
ASWaff, you're a Diehard Cowboys fan, huh? Dude, I think Lynn Swann was overrated as a player, but he makes for interesting political debate. Dude just wants to steer everyone who cares about politics away from his sports career and hopes he can sway sports fans who don't care about politics. He's not a novelty vote. There are worse politicians to choose from... Not that it matters, I'd vote for Rendell.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 0+-
I am a die hard Cowboys fan, but that has nothing to do with my views on Swann. In addition to being interested in sports, I'm also try to stay very politically aware. And while I won't deter ANYONE from being involved in politics, I don't think that it's a good idea for everyone to run...talking about celebrities in this instance. But I feel particularly bad about Swann, not because I'm a Cowboys fan and not because I'm a liberal, but because I've seen him speak and he seems utterly clueless. I'd just as soon see him save himself the embarassment and not run. Not hte embarassment of losing, because he probably won't. But the kind of embarassment that former atheletes that have gone into politics seem to deal with all the time. I've seen them make complete fools of themselves way too many times. And yes, there are worse politicians out there. But, if you're going to take that line of thought, I could say a rapist would govern better than a serial killer. I think our government can do better than appealing to the lowest denominator.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1226 days ago
Score 4+-
It's so great that Sir Charles in favor of education; I hate those political candidates who are opposed to it. ;-)
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
extra plus+
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
ASwaff - To separate fact from sub-fact: Swann IS running for Governor of PA, this year! Charles is 'talking about' running for Governor of Alabama 'some day'... Where is this conviction you speak of? Intentions are just that. Actions are MORE than intention.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 0+-
That's not entirely accurate. He's talking about running for governor as soon as he's legally able. And it's not like Charles is talking about this on a whim - he's been political for years. There are lots of people that are political and only mull over the idea of running without actually running. I don't think that makes them less of a person. I'd rather have a person mull over the idea of running and then abstain than have a person like Osborn, Swann or Bunning, who almost seems to get involved just because they know they can win.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
if it's NOT on a whim and he's been planning this for years, then he'd ALREADY have lived in Alabama for the last 7 years... ta da!
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1226 days ago
Score 2+-
Well, to hear him speak, it seems that recent political developments have turned a spark into a fire. He's always been INTERESTED in going into politics, but being interested and acting are two different things. I didn't say he'd been planning this for year, I said he'd been political for years and had mulled the idea of getting into politics for years. Planning and mulling are two different things.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1224 days ago
Score 1+-
How has he "been political"? I think there's more to "being political" than just saying you want to run for something: actually being involved in politics. Has he raised money for causes/candidates/parties? Has he devoted his own time to causes/candidates/parties? Did he study political science? Heck, how often does he vote?
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1226 days ago
Score 3+-
I'll vote for anything that bashes Bayless. As for Sir Chareles running for Gov, let him. If he has good ideas and the people elect him, so be it. I mean isn't that what democracy is about?
Permalink | Reply
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1226 days ago
Score -2+-
Yikes, a negative vote, Skip must read Armchair.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1226 days ago
Score 0+-
Democracy is about that (and popularity) however Democracy in a free market sells to the highest bidders and savviest marketers. ANYONE who wants to be a politician has something fundamentally wrong with them to begin with.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1224 days ago
Score 1+-
Democracy usually has very little to do with who has the best ideas. Haven't you learned that by now?
Permalink
BigPPupMajor Leaguer
1225 days ago
Score 2+-
I will not go as far as Manny has, but he did hit on something. Ive spent time working in politics and it takes a certain type of person. Charles Barkley (as much as I love him) is not that person. You cannot go into a state and in 4 yrs change it sheerly on the fact that you have a few ideas and some money to blow. Charles would be much better served working from the outside of the government and doing direct projects if he wants to serve his community.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1225 days ago
Score 2+-
That, I can agree with. I was just trying to understand why he's so down on Barkley, but so up on Swann. If you're going to be opposed to athletes/celebrities running, the least you can be is consistent.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1225 days ago
Score 0+-
Sorry, that was me. Don't know how I got logged off.
Permalink
Twins15Varsity Captain
1225 days ago
Score 3+-
Wait, someone actually read a Skip Bayless article? My condolences.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1224 days ago
Score 1+-
Let me say this, speaking as a political professional who's worked on a number of campaigns: celebrity campaigns are always all about the person's celebrity. They're always novelty candidates, at least initially. No matter how many good ideas they have, no matter how intelligent and reasonable, at least initially they are thought of a pre-packaged novelty candidate. Even if they come to succeed in politics on their own right - like New Jersey's Bill Bradley - they can often come to depend too much on their celebrity. In 1990, Bradley's reelection was almost derailed by his refusing to take a position on a state issue; he thought his personal popularity, both as a politician and a player, would seem through any political controversy. He won the race narrowly, over then-little known Christie Todd Whitman, but chose not to run for re-election.

Barkley's many personal problems will not help him in any run for office. Even if they are entirely in the past, and are not truly reflective of his character, they may well prevent him from even winning the primary (in either party) in as conservative a state as Alabama; Alabama is not a state that has ever accepted a statewide independent/third-party candidate, as far as I know. Moreover, I generally don't buy people running for statewide office as their first campaign. Politics is a rough business, and you can't expect to be able to defenestrate people and get away with it. Whether Barkley could succeed in the campaign or not, Alabama would probably be better served by a more experienced Governor, and Barkley would probably be better off channeling his public-service energies towards charity work.

But, if he wants to give it a shot, he should come out with an apologetic, tell-all book explaining his past behavior, and start getting involved with raising money for candidates of whichever party's nomination he wants to run for. Then maybe he'll be taken seriously by politicos. Until then he's entirely a novelty candidate.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1224 days ago
Score 0+-
sorry, "would see him through any political controversy", not "would seem through".
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Skip_Bayless_Shuns_Idea_of_Barkley_as_Governor"

This page was last modified 11:20, 30 July 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise