armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Salaries=Success? I think not!

12
Vote

by Cory McKnight

I was looking at the HoopsHype NBA salary page and I noticed something interesting about the top player salaries.

Of the top thirty players in salary, only five players have won an NBA Championship.

Michael Finley, number two on the list while making $21,696,750, is the top player on the list to win a title. Finley won his title as a starter on the San Antonio Spurs team of 2007.

Next on the list is Shaquille O’ Neal. O’ Neal makes $20,000,000 and has won four NBA Championships - tied with Tim Duncan for the most of any player on the top thirty.

Kobe Bryant, who checks in at number eight, is the next player on the list with a ring. Bryant, who makes $19,490,625, has won three NBA Championships, all while playing alongside O’ Neal.

Right after Kobe at number nine is Tim Duncan. Duncan, arguably the game’s greatest power forward ever, makes $19,014,187. Duncan has also led his Spurs teams to four NBA titles.

Only one other player in the top thirty has won a title. Ben Wallace with the 20th highest salary at $15,500,000 won one title with the Detroit Pistons.

In my eyes, this is an oddity with salaries. Some would think that teams who pay the most for a player would in turn win championships. Six players in the top 10 and 25 in the top 30 have not won a championship.

One player in the top 10, Tracy McGrady, has yet to even make the second round of the playoffs. The number one overall salaried player, Kevin Garnett, has never made an NBA Finals. Stephon Marbury, fourth on the list, only has two All-Star games to his record, and his only other accolade is an All-NBA 3rd Team.

Outside of individual salaries, there is a strange occurrence with team salaries as well. Some would argue that you could have the lowest overall salary in the league, but have the best “team” and still win a title. False. NBA teams need talent and to get it, they have to pay for it.

The New York Knicks have the highest team salary in the NBA. However, they failed to make the playoffs in the lowly Eastern Conference last season. Second on the list is the Dallas Mavericks. The Mavericks won 67 regular season games, but couldn’t get out of the first round.

The Denver Nuggets are third on the list, and they also failed to make the second round of the playoffs. The 10th team on the list, behind teams like the Pacers and 76ers, are the NBA Champion San Antonio Spurs.

Checking in at number 26 is the Chicago Bulls, who without a lapse in their last game, would have been in the NBA Finals. The Utah Jazz come into the equation at number 27, and they were a top four team in the tough Western Conference last season.

What does this all mean?

Basically, this means money cannot buy championships. Teams with players who have huge salaries do not always have success. It takes a true team, not a highly paid one, to excel in the NBA these days. My advice to NBA owners: spend less and find team players.

Want more NBA stories? Head to www.nbabeat.com!


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DNLLegend
875 days ago
Score 0+-
Finley's salary is being paid by the Mavs, who used the Allen Iverson Rule to cut him.
Permalink | Reply
ChristofMVP
875 days ago
Score 2+-
What is the Allen Iverson rule?
Permalink
DNLLegend
875 days ago
Score 4+-
Allen Houston, sorry. It was a one-time allowance wherein a team could cut a player, be responsible for the salary, but the salary wouldn't be counted against the cap. The joke was that it was made so that the Knicks could get out from under the $20m+ cap hell that Houston's contract had them under -- but of course, the omniscient Knicks thought better of it and didn't cut Houston.
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
875 days ago
Score 0+-
They cut Junk Yard Dog instead, right?
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
875 days ago
Score 2+-
A small correction: the provision wasn't that the salary wouldn't count against the cap, it was that it wouldn't count against the luxury tax threshold. Not to be a stickler, but I didn't write this thing for nothing! :)
Permalink
DNLLegend
875 days ago
Score 0+-
Davis why isn't that on the 'chair? :)
Permalink
Davis21wylieMVP
875 days ago
Score 0+-
Who says it's not?
Permalink
Cory McKnightSoccer Kid
875 days ago
Score 0+-
I know who he is being paid by, my point is that he is still getting paid that much money.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
875 days ago
Score 0+-
It's only money, why does everyone focus on salaries? Some of these dudes make more OUTSIDE of their contract - see: Shaq.

The numbers are useless - after paying taxes, accountant, agent, personal assistant, trainer, nutritionist, purchasing your HGH and other supplies, paying off baby's mamas, paying off the ho's, paying all of the car leases and financing a posse/illegal dog fighting ring/what have you - it's really not a lot of money...

Plus Finley already got his money straight up, not as salary. Cuban paid him in lump sum (like a legal settlement of sorts) but they prorate it out for accounting purposes.
Permalink | Reply
Davis21wylieMVP
875 days ago
Score 2+-
It should be noted that a lot of these guys were inked to max contracts before the luxury tax first took effect in 2002-03. Back then, teams had no additional penalty for using the Bird exception to give insane contracts to their own stars -- hence, Houston, Finley, etc. were given crazy long-term, back-loaded deals. When the NBA instituted the luxury tax, it changed everything, because you had to pay an extra dollar to the league for every dollar by which you exceeded the threshold. Even after the one-time amnesty provision, this is probably why most of the top-dollar players haven't won rings -- they went from being just a cap-killer to being a serious financial liability to their teams overnight when the tax set in.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
875 days ago
Score 3+-
it's not like you stack a team full of these guys to win that ring either... The NBA has always been a sports championed by relatively few teams. Only 8 teams (Lakers, Celtics, Pistons, Sixers, Rockets, Bulls, Heat and Spurs) have won the title since 1980. When you have big money guiys on the other teams, somebody isn't winning...
Permalink
Ea34Div-I Stud
875 days ago
Score 1+-
I see what you're aiming for here and it's a cool idea, but using championships as the only judging criteria is bit simplistic. It should be a factor, but so should a player's production on the floor and individual accolades (MVPs, All-NBA, All-Star team) should also be taken into account to see if a player warrants the salary he gets. Another interesting thought- was there a dramatic change in team revenue and attendance the first season or two after a max player joined the team?
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Salaries%3DSuccess%3F_I_think_not%21"

This page was last modified 15:55, 16 August 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise