armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Referees - A Fan's Worse Nightmare

12
Vote

by user Xtinct

As sports fans, we've all been on the wrong side of a referee's judgement regardless of sport. It's a wonder that only recently has mainstream media brought the dubious officiating to light. You've heard us fans attack the refs, unjustly sometimes. But the media has walked a fine line when it comes to outwardly targeting the faults of officiating until recently.

There are three qualms I have with officiating in sports: 1) Referee power trips, 2)Pre-Calls vs Late Calls (relating to basketball more than anything else), and 3) Make-up calls.

In my opinion, most referees are on a power trip. They hold the fate of something much larger than themselves in their lips with the simple breath into their whistle. They can change the outcome of a championship that they would never play for with just a simple gesture. And perhaps the true derivation of their power trip is in that last statement. Ever notice how referees, outside of soccer, never seem to be folks that have played the sport at a high level? Dick Bavetta dropping jumpers? Don't think so. It's almost as if referees were those guys who got picked last in pickup games deciding that if they can't play the game...they'll change the game. Just a theory.

We've all seen it. A referee blows the whistle immediately but upon replay absolutely nothing occurred. Or what about when the shot goes up, hits the backboard and rims out, then the whistle blows? You could argue pre-calls vs late calls all day as both have their pros and cons. Pre-calls make the referee seem definitive, sure of himself, even if replays show his judgement to be lacking. Late calls better ensure the right call but serve as ammunition to sports conspiracy addicts. Personally, I will take a late call over a pre-call anytime. Pre-calls assume that because a player made a certain motion, he committed a foul. A reach-in isn't a foul until contact with the opposing player is made. A loose ball foul is not a player jumping higher than the opposing player in front of him. I feel pre-calls have led to the phenomenom of flopping that plagues the NBA and is leaking into college ball. Late-calls on the other hand, though somewhat irritating, are usually proven to be correct when instant replays are run.

The infamous make-up call. These are the refs basically saying, 'Ok, I made a booboo, I'll fix it by making a call I normally wouldn't call in order to make everything right'. Two wrongs don't make a right. If the refs would stop with the pre-calls, a lot of make-up calls wouldn't have to happen.



Date

Thu 05/11/06, 5:35 am EST <pageTools></pageTools>

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1303 days ago
Score 2+-
I agree and disagree. For example, in a sport like Hockey make up calls can be important. If you give 1 team a questionable penalty, you have to call the questionable penalty on the other team. More than anything else, it is the lack of consistency that drives fans mad. But my biggest gripe is the way umpires solicit fights these days. The well publicised Angel Hernandez comment fromt he other day. I mean if an ump admits to having different rules for different players he should not be allowed to ump. I still thinkt he worst example is the Robbie Alomar incident. An umpire has no business swearing at or insulting a player. Calling Robbie Alomar a "fag" was an outrageous thing for an umpire to do.
Permalink | Reply
XtinctWaterboy
1303 days ago
Score 1+-
The other thing is there is very little in the way of reprimanding officials. Officials have to almost trip a player before they are suspended or officially punished.
Permalink | Reply
ChachiOSUDraft Pick
1302 days ago
Score 4+-
I think one of the biggest problems is that most officials (and I'm not sure about all sports but I know it's true in the NFL) are only really part-time employees. The hold other jobs during the offseason instead of honing their job skills. Between clinics, meetings, practices, and overseas games there should be plenty to keep them sharp, busy, and well trained.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1302 days ago
Score 0+-
In England, the FA introduced Professional Referees to help the situation. Cricket is a brilliant game, in that the umpires are only there to count the balls in the over - the players make the decisions themselves (i.e. if thet're out dubiously, and they know it, they leave, without waiting for the umpire). Refereeing could be improved without players moaning about the decisions, and just getting on with the GAME. If they called fouls on themselves, then the player themselves would get respect. Referees will make mistakes, they are human. No matter who was in charge of a game, mistakes would be made. Many fouls are just a referee's interpretation of the rule, and that leads to inconsistancy. There's not too much that can be done about that.
Permalink | Reply
XtinctWaterboy
1302 days ago
Score 0+-
But therein lies the problem, rules to a sporting event shouldn't be arbitrary to a referees' interpretation. It isn't philosophy. Either the rule needs to be redefined to be clear cut leaving no room for interpretation, or the training the referee receives leaves no room for a differing interpretation. The fact that referees can decide between halves that they are gonna 'let 'em play' is part of the problem. Players moan about the decisions because the decision vary due to interpretation instead of simple enforcement.
Permalink | Reply
ChachiOSUDraft Pick
1301 days ago
Score 0+-
There is actually an entire book called "Baseball and Philosophy" that I am reading. One of the essays in it, by J.R. Russell, actually makes the arguement that umpiring is actually rule interpretation (or adjudication) in some cases. He even makes the point that, "We need to recognize that rules are not so tidy, not in games nor in life..."
Permalink | Reply
XtinctWaterboy
1301 days ago
Score 0+-
To be honest, I'm not a baseball fan in the least so I cannot speak on umpiring. But with other sports, I think the rules definitely could use some tidying up if we are not going to instill a consistent interpretation by the officials.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Referees_-_A_Fan%27s_Worse_Nightmare"

This page was last modified 11:13, 11 May 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise