armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Psst. Inside Met Opinion from Dinnertime Conversation

5
Vote

by user Ron Sen, MD

A colleague of mine (I'll call him Joe) had dinner the other evening with an individual from the Mets' organization. Joe loves to talk baseball and got a few opinions out of the Met representative. I'll list the significant ones and examine them. Of course, you can be the judge yourself.

First, the Red Sox infield defense is overrated and they have limited range. They catch what they get to.

Let's look at the range factor and zone ratings for them and where they stand and see whether an outsider's perspective is true. Range factor is the number of chances (putouts plus assists) times nine divided by the number of innings Played. "Zone Rating is the percentage of balls fielded by a player in his typical defensive ‘zone’, as measured by STATS reporters."


Name Range factor(rank) Zone rating(rank)
Kevin Youkilis 9.46(8) .843(7)
Mark Loretta 4.67(8) .803(6)
Alex Gonzalez 3.95(11) .876(2) (Jeter 10th and 9th)
Alex Cora 4.56 .767 (not qualified by chances)
Mike Lowell 3.15(3) .868(1)
AVERAGE 7.5th 4th


Name Range factor(rank) Zone rating(rank)
Carlos Delgado 9.09 (9) .866 (6)
David Wright 2.24(13) .727 (12)
Jose Reyes 3.96(14) .878(2)

Although they aren't at the top of the heap, the Red Sox appear to be in the upper half of the AL overall, and relatively at least equal to the Amazing Mets.

Second, the Met said that he was glad the Mets had a big lead in the NL East because he had concerns about their pitching.

As of today, the Mets had allowed the third fewest runs in the National League, and had the second best E.R.A. Looking at my favorites, the WHIP and the K/BB ratio (the best predictor for future E.R.A.) the Mets were second in WHIP and 4th in K/BB. So, allowing for the fact that they play without the DH and in what most feel is currently the weaker league, their pitching looks solid.

Maybe that's the difference between analysis of objective data and one's "lying eyes", as we see what we believe.



Date

Fri 06/30/06, 4:26 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
1253 days ago
Score 1+-
Psst. The Red Sox just schooled the Mets. This sounds like sour grapes.
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1253 days ago
Score 2+-
He's just saying that the guy is wrong, on both the pro-Mets side (defense) and the anti-Mets side (pitching)
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Psst._Inside_Met_Opinion_from_Dinnertime_Conversation"

This page was last modified 23:01, 30 June 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise