I don't know, when you consider the historical purposes of that game, why would you do nothing about it?
It eliminated one dynasty and almost created another.
Nothings going to come of it. Matt Walsh is a bum -- why would someone want immunity if what they were saying was true? Have you ever seen someone on the witness stand who testified truthfully be sued? Nope.
Nothing will come of this because even if the D-Bag Matt Walsh has anything he will never be able to prove that the Pats ordered him tape the Rams walkthrough.
As far this legacy of the Pats being tarnished think about this. Everyone knows that video taping signals was common practice for the majority of NFL teams. Since that Pats were the first to be disciplined for this all the jealous fans of pathetic teams are acting like this is the reason they won 3 out of 4. They are wrong, and nothing is tarnished. Listen to what other coaches around the league think about it. They think nothing of it because they have been doing it themselves. The only coach who had anything bad to say about the Pats video practices was Tony Dungy, and he is a loser.
It's easier to block and tackle when you know what to expect. The Patriots made that game by being very efficient at picking apart the Ram's defense.
Almost like they knew what the Ram's were going to do...
ya but, the great marshall faulk and jurt warner should have been able to do the same. Any one who has ever played fottball and watched a film knows things are still need to be executed nd you can scout all you want but, you still need to play well and the rams could have changed their game plan and did its not like the patd blew them out the rams d could have steped up at the last drive and did not
16,779
3,380
15,624
