armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

One Hundred and Six and Thirteen

28
Vote

by user Harold Friend

LouGehrig

In an interview before Sunday's game against division rival Houston, St. Louis manager Tony LaRussa was asked if Jason Isringhausen would be available that night, since the Cardinals' closer had pitched in the team's last two games. LaRussa, who is a lawyer, hesitated an instant and then replied that, since Sunday's game would be his team's last game before the All-Star break, Jason could be used if necessary.

Let us go back to the thrilling days of 1974, when men were men and baseball was baseball. On June 18, Los Angeles was playing Pittsburgh. Tommy John started for Los Angeles against the Pirates ace bullpen man, Dave Guisti, who would start only two games the entire season. With Los Angeles trailing 1-0, Mike Marshall was brought in to relieve John. Marshall yielded a run as the Bucs went on to a 2-0 victory, but that is not what is significant. Marshall appeared in the next 12 Los Angeles games, setting a record for consecutive game appearances by a pitcher.

Mike Marshall made 106 appearances that season. You read that right. Marshall appeared in 106 games in relief, won 15 while losing 12, pitched 208 1/3 innings, allowed 191 hits, only 9 of which were home runs, led the National League with 21 saves, and had a 2.42 ERA. Making 106 appearances is impressive, but Marshall had warmed up the year before when, as a member of the Montreal Expos, he made 92 appearances, winning 14 games.

Marshall's record for consecutive appearances by a pitcher didn't last too long, but it has never been broken, and considering today's approach, it will stand for quite a while. In August, 1986, thirty year old rookie relief pitcher Dale Mohorcic appeared in 12 consecutive games for the Texas Rangers. In the 13th game, with the Rangers ahead of Kansas City by six runs, Rangers' manager Bobby Valentine brought in Mohorcic to face one batter in order to allow him to tie Marshall's record.

The next day the Rangers were again in Kansas City and trailing 4-3. Valentine brought in Mitch Williams, who pitched a scoreless seventh and eighth, but the Rangers never tied the score and lost, 4-3. Valentine didn't bring in Mohorcic, which was the right move, and Mohorcic merely tied Marshall's record.

Today's players are bigger and stronger than any in the history of the game. They have the benefit of highly effective training methods, including personal trainers, exercise and nutrition regimens, and technologic advances to help their mechanics . But they are the most pampered players to ever sign a contract, and there lies the rub.

Teams who pay a pitcher multi million dollar contracts for many seasons must protect their investment. The days of Robin Roberts or Don Newcombe or Bob Turley or Warren Spahn starting on two or one day's rest and appearing in relief on the others are long since gone. If a manager is faced with the choice of protecting his employer's investment or gambling with that investment in an attempt to win, the manager must protect the owner's investment. What did you say was the name of the game?

References

http://www.baseball-reference.com/m/marshmi01.shtml

http://www.retrosheet.org/

http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/ballplayers/M/Marshall_Mike102.stm

http://www.baseball-almanac.com/recbooks/rb_rlief.shtml


Date

Mon 07/10/06, 10:09 am EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DNLLegend
1240 days ago
Score 0+-
I disagree with the premise that you end with. It's not a conflict between winning and "protecting [an] investment." It's a conflict between winning today at the cost of putting yourself at a disadvantage tomorrow. It is not by historical accident that pitchers are in the game less often than they were 30 years ago, but rather because the pitcher who is used in the current fashion is worth more, over the long run, than the guy used in the older way.
Permalink | Reply
LouGehrigRed-Shirting
1240 days ago
Score 0+-
Does Marshall support your premise? How about Sparky Lyle, Goose Gossage, or Bruce Sutter?

Actually, I DO agree with you because you make an excellent point, but I think that a manager would not be allowed to take a chance ending a pitcher's career to win a pennant or even a WS.

Stengel burned out Turley in 1958, but it won the Yankees a World Series. There are other instances and that would not be allowed to happen today. I think it is based on values. Is ruining a pitcher worth a World Championship?
Permalink
UfgatorsDiv-I Stud
1240 days ago
Score -2+-
not cool--i made an article like this already. the 1800's article.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1240 days ago
Score 0+-
teams don't pitch guys as much now as 'back in the day' because pitchers today rely on throwing the fastball as fast as possible and making the curveball curve as much as possible. This stresses the arm too much. Dudes could throw more often back then because they threw strikes and changed speeds (it's called 'pitching') instead of trying to strike every batter out. A ground out can be accomplished in one mediocre pitch, a strikeout take 3-7 or more pitches! There were alot more Jamie Moyers and Greg Madduxes back then...
Permalink | Reply
LouGehrigRed-Shirting
1240 days ago
Score 0+-
Like Seaver, Ryan, Chance, Richard, Koufax, McDowell, Gibson, Gossage, and Forster? Compare the number of batters' strikeouts today with the number of batters' strikeouts in the 1960s and 1970s.

When Mickey Mantle struck out 111 times with 23 HRs and a .311 BA, he was criticized for having a poor season because he struck out too much.

Today's batters are setting records for HRs. A major reason for pitcher fatigue is the shrunken strike zone. If today's pitchers had the mound as it was before 1968 (15" vs. 10" today) and the rule book strike zone, baseball scores would resemble soccer scores.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1240 days ago
Score 1+-
compare k's/9 back then with today
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1240 days ago
Score 1+-
log in log in log in!!! ^that was me
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/One_Hundred_and_Six_and_Thirteen"

This page was last modified 11:01, 14 August 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise