Off Limits
| 3
|
by user Ron Sen, MD
What's off limits in sports journalism? Obviously, opinion deserves distinction from facts, although columnists frequently challenge the line. Of course, their argument is, "I'm a columnist, not a reporter."
But what truly deserves privacy or privilege in communication? I'm not talking about plagiarism, but sensitive information.
No list can be complete, but certainly these merit inclusion. Most writers eschew discussion of alcohol or drug abuse, philandering, homosexuality, information given in confidence (off the record), mental health, money problems, and gambling. Players might initiate or agree to a 'human interest' story if they feel that it might show them in a better light.
If a writer knew of a damaging story about a player, why conceal it? First and foremost, it destroys communication with the player. No talkie, no story. Players aren't obligated to give you the story you want, when you want. Second, most writers are fans, and who wants their favorite team torn asunder by a scandal? Third, even sports writers may suckle at the teat of human kindness. Rarely.
Jerry Maguire aside, there aren't many stories about the relationships between players and their agents. I guess the 'show me the money' principle is enough.
You can be sure that the dirt from sports journalists literally represents the tip of the iceberg. Probably just as well, because many of us want to believe in the Bunyanesque stature of our favorites, fantasy or not.
Date
Mon 07/17/06, 6:31 pm EST
