armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Loyalty is limited in the Patriots franchise

17
Vote

by user DRE-LO

There is no question that the Patriots have been the most successful franchise of this decade. Three Super Bowls in a five year period is a dynasty in the salary-cap era of the NFL. Patriots home games are sold out game in and game out as their fans continue to demonstrate their loyalty and connection to the players their attendance.

It's a shame that that same loyalty is not equivocated within the franchise.

The Patriots front office has walked a thin line between doing great business and exhibiting pettiness. I believe they're doing the latter now.

Instead of blaming the New York Jets for wanting in on negotiations with a former Super Bowl MVP that should have been locked from Jump Street, Robert Kraft needs to take a look in the mirror. Now Deion Branch is with the Seahawks in a move that suggests that the Super Bowl runner-up curse might be in jeopardy this year.

While he is staring at that mirror, he should also ask why Adam Vinatieri is in a Colts uniform. If I had a kicker that kicked 2 game winning field goals in the Super Bowl and a game winning field goal in damn near blizzard conditions, I'd hold on to him like grim death. Kraft refused to pay the rent and now the Colts are that much more dangerous.

It seemed like yesterday that Lawyer Milloy had that nasty contract dispute with the Patriots front office that had him becoming a Buffalo Bill a couple of weeks later. Lawyer Milloy was a staple on the Pats D in their first Super Bowl and I originally gave the Patriots front office the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps Lawyer was on to something.

Willie McGinest was a vital part of the 3-4 defense having to alternate between DE and LB. He always came to play in every game and I will never forget the incredible goalline stop he made a couple of years ago against the Colts in a key regular season game. He spent his first dozen years as a Patriot and gave tham more than enough. One would think that the front office would be eager to have him finish his career off as a Patriot.

Not this front office.

Now Willie McGinest is with Cleveland. Cleveland!!!!!! He's fortunate that his head coach is his former def. coordinator Romeo Crennel. But it's still unacceptable in my judgment.

How about Troy Brown? Troy Brown literally played iron man football for the Pats the past two or three years. He played wide receiver and filled in at cornerback when the Pats were decimated with injuries in the secondary the season that they won their third SB. Troy Brown was a free agent after that season and what did the Pats do?

They released him.

Yet Troy Brown was so loyal to the Pats that he resigned with them with the minimum $500,000 contract just so he could achieve success again.

I don't think I need to say what happened with David Givens.

They are more than fortunate that Bill Belichick's staff have such a knack for effectively developing their draft picks into productive players.

It is sad that the background to such a great dynasty by the Pats has to have a dark shadow like this hanging around. Troy Brown, Deion Branch, Willie McGinest and certainly Adam Vinatieri were just as much a part of the dynasty as anyone else. They deserved better.

With Brady and Belichek, you can never count the Pats out until the end. But Tom Brady is handcuffed in terms of establishing a passing game. His leading receiver in the 2-point win over Buffalo was a TE.

There was a special bond between the great Cowboys teams of the 90's and the great 49er teams of the 80's that went beyond business transactions. Imagine how things may have turned out differently if the trio of Aikman, Irvin and Emmitt would have been compromised due to "business". Thank goodness they didn't have a salary cap back then or who knows what would have happened.

It's just sad that Robert Kraft and the front office of the Pats can't reciprocate anywhere near the same loyalty that the players and fans have given to them.


Date

Wed 09/13/06, 7:21 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1176 days ago
Score 1+-
Bah, you speak only in terms of ownership loyalty. Where's Branch's loyalty? The players are just as culpable in this equation and to contend otherwise is silly. It's a two-sided coin, and no matter how many times you flip it only two sides remain.
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1176 days ago
Score 1+-
The thing about the Patriots is that they have won with so many dime a dozen players that it hasn't mattered who they play. They are a team that has won on hard work and good coaching (and a bogus call here and there) as opposed to quality players. They lose a player and just plug some undrafted free agent in there and continue to win. But they have lost too many players and more importantly, too many coaches. For me this is the year that will prove the Pats once and for all. Some College teams have 5 better WRS than the Pats have right now. If the Pats can manage to win games with this offense, than they deserve it. I just don't see how Reche Caldwell, Troy Brown and Peter Gabriel (In Your Eyes), all of whom are 3rd WRs at best, can be successful. But they have proved me wrong before...
Permalink | Reply
DRE-LOAAA-er
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
And that's why the Pats are fortunate to have a great coach such as Belichek who can bring out the max in every player's potential. That's why you can never count them out and I certainly won't now. But far too many players and coaches who contributed more than their fair share have been lost by the Pats. It can't be ignored.
Permalink
DRE-LOAAA-er
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
I continue to mess up Belichick's name!! My bad.
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
The other thing about Belichicken is what he did with Dillon. Here you got a guy who had behavior problem in Cinci. no one in the league really wanted him. He came to NE and has been a pro's pro. That is a credit to coaching.
Permalink
DrpatriotAll-American
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
The Patriots front office is a machine. They couldn't allow Willie or Troy to stay with their extremely high cap cuts, and the Vinatieri cut is start to look good (Vinatieri is injured, and the Ghost is 9/9 and 2/2 past 50 in the preseason).

As for Branch, the Pats offered him six million per year and Branch refused. There's nothing they can do about that.

Finally, let's name players that have remained loyal to the team, players whose names remain unsaid. Matt Light. Richard Seymour. Tom Brady. Corey Dillon. All of these players have extended for significantly less than they would have received in free agency (except maybe Seymour). There's plenty of loyalty in the Patriots organization, you just have to look beyond the surface.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
thats a great point...i mean hes a kicker...yeah hes made 2 super bowl winning kicks, but how many other kickers have had the chance to do that? aside from the idiot vanderjagt, i wouldn't be surprised if any other kicker would do the same, given the oppurtunity
Permalink
DRE-LOAAA-er
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
He should have finished his career as a Patriot. That's just how I feel. Obviously any kicker has the capability to do what Vinatieri did. But the fact is that no one has duplicated what he did. As for Vanderjagt................
Permalink
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
I understand what you are saying, but at some point you release players who have an impact on the team. Its one thing to let McGinest go. Hanging on to him would be for emotional reasons only. Most of his good playing years are behind him. But I disagree on AV and Branch. These are both guys with plenty of years ahead of them. I don't see how you can say the AV move is looking good? What about Viniatieri's 4-4 performance on FGs last Sunday has convinced you that he is injured? The guy has been the best kicker in the NFL for a long time and will remain so for a while longer.
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1175 days ago
Score 1+-
I think Adam V's most memorable kick is the one in the Snow Bowl against the Raiders. Just phenomenal.
Permalink
DRE-LOAAA-er
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
Why are we so willing to give hefty contracts with guaranteed money to rookies as soon as they walk through the doors of the NFL and haven't played a down but yet have such a hard time giving those contracts to players like a Deion Branch who have done more than enough to prove themselves. It's quite simple. Prove yourself and earn your contract rather than just have it handed to you. The Pats have a hard time coming out of the pocket to players who have helped make this franchise as great as it is now.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
But Branch was offered $6-7 million a year...that's lofty territory for maybe a top 20 wideout. Branch's expectations were totally unreasonable. Look at Brady, dude has the right to demand Peyton type money but didn't for the better of the team. If you ask me Branch was the one being disloyal.
Permalink
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
Maybe they saw what happened when PHilly threw a lot of money at a star wide receiver and how that esentially blew up in the Eagles' face?
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
Really bad comparison. TO was a tumor. By all accounts, Branch is a really good guy that they are going to miss.
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
I honestly don't think they are going to miss him too much. Yes he is an above average reviever, but not deserving of the money he just signed for. He is a small reciver and prone to injury and he does not possess the game breaking speed like a Steve Smith does.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1175 days ago
Score 1+-
It's NOT a Dynasty until it lasts longer than the TV show Dynasty
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
The pats don't overpay players. Vinnateri left by choice, he was offered a large contract, but diddn't take it. The Pats now have 2 first round picks, a decent young WR, a Rookie WR, and could trade up and grab Jeff Somarja in the draft. Who would you rather have, Branch or Somarja
Permalink | Reply
MetsJetsDevilsDraft Pick
1175 days ago
Score 2+-
Branch. Maybe Chad Johnson will play at some point, but Rookie WRs don't sypically contribute for a few years.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1175 days ago
Score 0+-
Why is everyone in love with Jeff Samoerghiodehgoeidza as a WR when clearly he'll be playing minor league baseball next year (AGAIN) instead...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #3
1162 days ago
Score 0+-
not overpaying players they DONT need is obviously very much an integral part of their sucess. teams cannot afford to clog their salary cap with overpaid and expendable veterans in this era of parity. you don't see the pats being stingy with players who are vital to their sucess such as Brady or Seymour. what makes you think you know more about running an nfl franchise than kraft or belichek?
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Loyalty_is_limited_in_the_Patriots_franchise"

This page was last modified 21:33, 14 September 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise