Will a Founder please explain?

He can't say anything - isn't that good enough?

I can answer that. A ban on ArmchairGM prohibits a user from commenting, editing, and sending board messages to any non-admin (or non-founder, can't remember which) assuming they are permabaned. They can also still edit their profile.

What is the difference in him voting as an anon or under his own user name?

Dunno that there is a good reason.

Well, I can't speak to the logistics of the ban, but I can say he still wants to be here and thinks the ban was unfair

Well, so you all know - I have officially issued a warning that if said user(s) continue to eminate defamatory utterings about me or my family on other sites which were explicitly designed to attack my personal life that I will pursue the proper channels and have him prosecuted for criminal acts including cyberstalking.

It will go NO further.

Needless attacks on my brother, about my personal life and statements about "pissing on my grave" are not funny but are clear threats.

I requested that they not only cease personal attacks but also that they shut down the "blog" which was set up solely to harass me.

I suggest that any and all AGMers quietly ignore said cyberstalkers. Trolls are one thing, but many lines have been crossed and I won't stand for it.

Convicts cant vote why should the banned lol </sarcasm>

If your hands were made of hotdogs, would you eat them?

with my spelling u would think i typed that way as well

The way I'm reading this is sort of like being excommunicated. You can't go to communion but you're still Catholic.