The Lockerroom
This is a the place to discuss the site, community issues, discuss ideas for opinions, and other things related to the community but not specifically about sports. You can add something to the locker room by clicking the link.
In Which Joketard Takes Credit for Someone Else's Work Once Again Then Proves Himself to Be a Psycho Loser Who Can't Stop Thinking About Manny Stiles
If you don't care for silly drama and childish nonsense, then read something else:
I'm just going to rebut the jibberish that can't seem to keep from following me like it's my personal dingleberry.
A quote from another website:
"Jay the Joke - Where the facts are the facts instead of bias. In other words, the complete opposite of the amateurish armchair Monday morning quarterbacking antics of the Chicago Sun-Times."
Take note that the word armchair on the page linked to my profile page here at AGM. Because he can't keep my name off of his lying lips...
This was the closing paragraph on JaytheJoke's front page article titled In Which we listen to a lawyer, not a F*!cktard.
The article was actually just a fine example of the "Administrator" there taking credit for someone else's efforts... again. Congrats on getting usurped for your efforts "dui_attorney". Must be comforting to know you've been a member at JTJ since December but never got any kind of recognition or support until you created something original the King Joketard could take credit for...
See... when something original or ... COHERENT is posted on JTJ, it suddenly becomes property of the King Joketard to use as his personal armory.
I don't know how a lawyer spouting about the possibilities in a case in which he has zero facts to base his conclusion, nee HYPOTHESIS furthers the "awesomeness" of JTJ. I mean, it's almost like the Jokesters see a lot of syllables and suddenly have reason to hope their site won't suck as much this day.
Note: A lawyer giving advice to a guy when he doesn't even know what state the offender's driving license is maintained is what most people call "an issue" and certainly puts you on the fast skilift up Slippery Slope.
And for T. Baggs to back the conceptualizations of an attorney is quite ironic considering the pages and pages of slander and vile attacks he has posted about lawyers. Yet, WE are the hypocrites of the Internet...
Memo to the Administrator, if you want the "facts" - as you claim to be all about - let's have them out in the open instead of hiding the real facts behind hidden agendas of jealousy, lies, slander and hate.
But you and I both know that "facts" are the bane to your existence!
All of this certainly ranks low in the ironic humor department compared to this: Where Joketard claims that "Lurkers" (who are in fact, valuable, contributing MEMBERS of AGM - and conveniently also the AUTHORS of said post) dub him "a voice of reason". Pretty fantastic leap of imagination there...
Hey, Enema Breath - YOU are the lurker and your "name" and "voice of reason" go together like dogshit and peanut butter.
Ohhhhhh Kaaaaay.
Besides,
1) calling others "amateurish" isn't very professional,
and
2) I AM AN AMATEUR, Numbnuts.
Furthermore, Tyrone... doesn't your wife get jealous of all the time you spend thinking about me?
