armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Is Wide Receiver in the NFL Overated?

20
Vote

by user The Beast

Also published...

Williams and Rogers were banished to NFL Siberia when they were drafted by Lions.
Williams and Rogers were banished to NFL Siberia when they were drafted by Lions.

Jon Kitna's remarks last week regarding the impact of rookie Calvin Johnson, got me thinking that maybe the wide receiver position in the NFL is extremely overated.

Kitna had said that Johnson's addition to the Lions will help them win at least ten games.

In the NFL, the wide receiver does not have as great an impact as you might think. He only touches the ball five to ten times a game. On the other hand, a quarterback handles the ball every single play, and a running back usually touches it at least twenty times a game.

It's not that the receiver is not important, its just that one great receiver can not dominate every play like a quarterback or running back can. Team's need a solid receiving core, not just one superstar.

Besides their limitation in touches, receivers can only be as good as their offensive line and quarterback. If you place the best receiver on the Oakland Raiders, even he won't manage to get open in under two seconds. While he is running his route his quarterback is getting planted into the dirt by a 300 pound defensive tackle.

We saw this with Randy Moss last season. He was a Pro-Bowler while playing in Minnesota. The Vikings had Pro-Bowl Quarterbacks in Randall Cunningham and Daunte Culpepper in addition to being anchored by a strong offensive line. Due to these factors Moss was able to be dominate year after year.

When in Oakland, things changed. The Raiders had the worst offensive line in football and were quarterbacked by Aaron Brooks and Andrew Walter. As a result his production dropped dramatically.

Moss's situation shows that without the play of a solid offensive line, a dominant left tackle, and an efficient quarterback, any great receiver is limited.

So, why do NFL teams continue to invest high draft picks on receivers before they have a strong offensive line and effective. Look at some of the best receivers today.

Donald Driver has shown that to be a productive receiver in the NFL you need an efficient quarterback and a solid offensive line.
Donald Driver has shown that to be a productive receiver in the NFL you need an efficient quarterback and a solid offensive line.
  • Reggie Wayne: Late First Round
  • Chad Johnson: 2nd Round
  • Chris Chambers: 2nd Round
  • Isaac Bruce: 2nd Round
  • Steve Smith: 3rd Round
  • Donald Driver: 7th Round
  • T.J. Houshmandzadeh: 7th Round
  • Rod Smith: Not Drafted

What do they all have in common? Besides all being late round draft choices, they were all placed on good teams. Johnson and Houshmandzadeh played with a Pro-Bowler Quarterback Carson Palmer and a well-established offensive line. Isaac Bruce was on the Greatest Show on Turf, enough said. Reggie Wayne plays with Peyton Manning. Steve Smith plays with Pro-Bowler Jake Delhomme and an oustanding Panthers offensive line. Donald Driver has played with future hall of famer Brett Favre.

Many of the recent top ten receivers weren't as lucky as those late round steals.

  • Peter Warrick: 4th Overall
  • Travis Taylor: 10th Overall
  • David Terrell: 8th Overall, 2001
  • Charles Rogers: 2nd Overall, 2003
  • Reggie Williams: 9th Overall, 2004
  • Mike Williams: 10th Overall, 2005

All of these players share were drafted in the top ten by lousy teams with terrible offensive lines. In college they seemed to be stars in the making, but they never had the chance to develop while on horrible teams. Warrick was on the lousy Bengals teams of the early 2000s. Rogers and Mike Williams played for the Detroit Lions with Joey Harrington and a porous offensive line.

These examples show how receivers can only make an impact when on a team with a solid offensive line and an efficient quarterback. If they end up going to lousy teams, such as the Lions, Bengals, or Jaguars, it is extremely difficult to become a Pro-Bowl wideout.

A word of advice to NFL General Managers: build a strong offensive line before you draft a receiver in the top ten (a la Matt Millen).



Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 1+-
I think this is Beast's best effort EVER at ArmchairGM. Way to go kid!
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 0+-
Well this is certainly one hell of a revision. Before, all it read was "f".
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 1+-
No, seriously - all that was on the page was "f".
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 1+-
He is correct. I always put a one letter at first. Then I copy/paste my stuff from blogger. I can format it better that way. Lets give the man a break. For once, I'll back up my foe, Briggs.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 0+-
What is your blog?
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 0+-
http://www.r...central.com/
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 0+-
Its not exactly mine. I write for it. I have another blog called West Coast Bias, but its under construction.
Permalink
DNLLegend
880 days ago
Score 3+-
The funny thing is, as revised, this really is a great article. So I voted your comment up, thinking it was honest. :)
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 1+-
Ya, at first I thought he was serious. Good one Dan!
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 1+-
No bullshit - nice blog. Looks like you put some good time on it. If you post the entire article (like you did here), is it not okay to put a link to the accompanying blog?
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 2+-
Hey. There really isn't any point of giving Tyrone a minus over asking me what my blog is. Seriously, what is the point.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 1+-
Okay, this is what happened. I saw a new article pop up from Beast. I clicked it and all that was there was "f". And I'm thinking WTF? So I wrote "great job" (see above). Re-visited about a minute later, and here was the entire column. And you what - it is a good article. As is the blog (even though I'm a Bears fan). Again - nice work.
Permalink
ChristofMVP
880 days ago
Score 1+-
You can thank the West Coast offense for overatting the WR position....
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 0+-
Ya, I doubt Jerry Rice would have been a star without Bill Walsh's offense.
Permalink
DNLLegend
880 days ago
Score 2+-
I think the point is perfectly on: the most important part of an offense is the line, and not the RB, WR, or even QB. The Greatest Show on Turf had a line anchored by a Hall of Famer in Orlando Pace. That's part of the reason that Kurt Warner was so great -- he could have barbecued a pig out there before he'd be touched.
Permalink | Reply
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 1+-
He was great with Pace and then a flop with the Giants and Cardinals due to poor offensive lines.
Permalink
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
880 days ago
Score 1+-
Getting drilled in the head a half-dozen times certainly didn't help Warner either. Protection is everything.
Permalink
The BeastAAA-er
880 days ago
Score 2+-
Protection is everything... trojansamplerlrg.jpg
Permalink
CoreyisarealboyMajor Leaguer
880 days ago
Score 4+-
And yet these guys are the most flamboyant, egotistical lot of the bunch. Ironic, huh?
Permalink | Reply
WizardmanRed-Shirting
880 days ago
Score 1+-
Great article. Just goes to show that it's easy to find a WR diamond in the rough. Plus, Jerry Rice was picked 16th. 16TH! The guy taken 17th a year before? Clyde Duncan. I have no idea who that is either.
Permalink | Reply
CheezerAll-Star
879 days ago
Score 0+-
I gotta disagree with Chambers being the one of the best in the league. According to some play-by-play analysis done by the guys at Football Outsiders, Chmabers catch percenatge was 39% in 2006. Worst in the league for WR targeted more than 50 times. Catch percentage is the relationship of receptions to the number of times targeted.
Permalink | Reply
WrmjrRed-Shirting
879 days ago
Score 0+-
One issue related to this is that the salary structure of the NFL (and high 1st round picks) makes it virtually impossible for teams drafting early to choose any position on the line except Left Tackle. If you were the Raiders this year and you thought there was an absolute stud at Center, you couldn't take him first because his salary would be completely out of whack compared to other centers in the league. It's easy to say that the Raiders should (in this hypothetical situation) trade the pick, but the fact is that there are certain positions which simply cannot be the first overall pick because of salary issues.
Permalink | Reply
Morgansdad522Tee-Baller
876 days ago
Score 0+-
Just a thought...maybe the problem isn't that the position of wide receiver is overrated, but rather the NFL's standard for evaluating talent at this particular position sucks. Enjoyed the article.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Is_Wide_Receiver_in_the_NFL_Overated%3F"

This page was last modified 16:41, 27 July 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise