armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

How Does the "Prospect for Major Leaguer" Deal Play Out?

9
Vote

by user Andersed

We've seen it many times: at the trade deadline, or even in the offseason, a contending team sends multiple minor leaguers for one or two solid major league players. The latest example is the Bobby Abreu trade. Of course, in ten years we could refer to it as the "C.J. Henry" trade, after the top prospect involved in the deal. Odds are low.

Perhaps my memory fails me (and feel free to refresh it), but I haven't seen the Yankees get bit by this type of deal recently. Clearly the Yankees do not believe that all four of those players will become good enough players to pass Abreu and Lidle. Or maybe they're that willing to mortgage their future.

There are very few trades where multiple prospects surpass the major leaguer involved. My Mariners traded Randy Johnson to the Astros for Freddy Garcia, Carlos Guillen, and John Halama. All of them are contributors in the major leagues. Guillen and Garcia could become All-Stars with a seasonal bump. Then there's Tampa Bay phenom Scott Kazmir, whom the Mets traded for Victor Zambrano.

There's a major difference with those trades compared to the Abreu deal - all of those prospects were close to the bigs at the time of the trade. Garcia went straight to the M's, Guillen and Halama came up the next year. Three of these prospects are Single-A players, described by Steve Phillips as "mid-level".

Another example is the Giants' trade of Joe Nathan, Francisco Liriano, and Boof Bonser for A.J. Pierzynski. Nathan was already a major leaguer, but Liriano and Bonser were a couple years away.

Though I've used examples that show how the prospect receiver makes out well in trades, I think the better bet long-term is to deal prospects for major leaguers. That's why the best teams makes those type of trades. Also, those prospects aren't likely to stay with the same team for any significant period of time. Garcia, Guillen, and Halama were all gone by the middle of the 2004 season.

To deal specifically with this trade, Lidle and Abreu are iffy players for how much money the Yankees are dishing out. They're each switching to more difficult leagues, Abreu's power has disappeared mysteriously in the last year and Lidle is a home run pitcher. He's no Javier Vazquez, and we all know how that turned out.

As a Mariner fan, and someone who casually wishes the Yankees ill because of George Steinbrenner and a certain small segment of the fan population and Alex Rodriguez, I'm a bit displeased by this trade. If the Yankees get healthy (odds are low), the lineup will be formidable. But in a seven-game series, the pitching isn't scary. I don't see them getting past the ALCS.


Date

Sun 07/30/06, 8:57 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1216 days ago
Score -1+-
Yankees do not need to worry about their future, they have enough money to spend on other players when they get good. They spend on now rather than the future, hoping success now will fund their need to trade in future. Not that many Yankees players that go on to become Yankees of note play too long in the minors.
Permalink | Reply
Bobbyjim45Draft Pick
1216 days ago
Score 1+-
Exactly. The Yankees are always changing. They will just continue to do what they are doing now. They purchase big name stars and don't even really need their minor leaguers. Where most teams would've used an up-and-coming player to fill the hole made by Sheff and Matsui, the Yankees went out and bought a guy. The Yankees will go buy another starter at the deadline instead of bringing up somebody, because they can do that. Their future lies in the current all-stars of other teams, not their minor league system.
Permalink
FriskysmanVarsity Captain
1216 days ago
Score 0+-
Problem is, they keep spending more and more money and don't have a championship to show for it since 2000. And that was back in the days of Tino Martinez, Scott Brosius and Paul O'Neill, long before they started their crazy spending sprees we've been seeing of late. Since then they've gotten A-Rod, Matsui, Sheffield, Giambi, Johnson, Mussina, and Pavano and have absolutely nothing to show for it. It might be time to consider bolstering the farm system. That's been working for teams like the Tigers, Twins and A's.
Permalink
FriskysmanVarsity Captain
1216 days ago
Score 0+-
Though I must admit that none of them have a championship either.
Permalink
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1216 days ago
Score 1+-
yet +
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/How_Does_the_%22Prospect_for_Major_Leaguer%22_Deal_Play_Out%3F"

This page was last modified 10:26, 31 July 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise