armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Hawk-Eye Wants Your Job

10
Vote

by user Allonthefield

Line judges and umpires, beware.

Hawk-Eye, the electronic replay system at Wimbledon, may put you out of a job.

The system was in effect for the first time in this year's Wimbledon Championships, and its affect on the game was felt in compelling fashion. Roger Federer, who went on to win the tournament and solidify his case for the greatest player of all time, nearly lost because of it.

Federer had apparently won the first set tiebreak when a call was reversed in Nadal's favor. The replay showed the ball nicked the line and the point was played over. Federer won the set anyway, and all was well.

But then came a crucial point in the fourth set, when Federer trailed 0-2. The game was 30-all and Federer breathed a sigh of relief when Nadal hit a ball that everyone in the stadium believed to be out.

Except for Hawk-Eye, that is.

The point was given to Nadal, who went on to take the break and glide through the rest of the set. After the game, Federer was heard to say that Hawk-Eye "is killing me."

Had Federer not rallied to win the fifth and deciding set, the story of the day would be Hawk-Eye. It is, of course, merely a footnote, but not one that should go unnoticed.

Proponents of Hawk-Eye say that it makes the game as fair as it can be. I beg to differ, and so does Roger Federer.

For one thing, machines like that need to be calibrated to the nth degree. As John McEnroe pointed out on the telecast, even a 90% accuracy rating isn't perfect. If that machine is off even by a millimeter, it can make the difference in the match.

Not only that, but the machine slows down the pace of the game considerably. Several times Nadal seemed to challenge simply to disrupt Federer's momentum; if the call was overturned, that was a bonus.

Human umpires and referees make mistakes; it's a proven fact. But the element of subjectivity and human error has always been a component of tennis, and the sport has survived just fine for over a century without adding machines into the mix.

I'd just as soon leave it that way.

This article is also published at All on the Field sports blog.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
880 days ago
Score 4+-
If the machine is more accurate than a human being, than I am all for using the machine. This is why I am a big beliver in instant replay - IN ALL SPORTS.
Permalink | Reply
AllonthefieldVarsity
879 days ago
Score 1+-
Don't know if you saw the match today, but if the machine was off by the smallest of margins, it very well could have thrown the match for Federer. That ball was so close that a half-percent error could have caused it to give the wrong ruling. If they can prove Hawk-Eye 100% reliable, then I'm all for it. Just make sure they fire all the line judges and umpires too.
Permalink | Reply
Kwitt11Varsity Captain
879 days ago
Score 0+-
So...are you saying that the line judges are 100% reliable? Because there's no way that's true. I'll take a machine over the human eye any day, at least when we're dealing with balls traveling 120 mph being a centimeter in one direction or another...
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Hawk-Eye_Wants_Your_Job"

This page was last modified 21:40, 8 July 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise