armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Football vs. Baseball: An In-Depth Comparison

13
Vote

by user Shrubbery

I was confronted on another blog with a foolish contention that baseball is somehow a superior sport than American football. So I decided to analyze the two sports side-by-side and offer up a detailed and objective, or not so objective, juxtaposition of America’s two most popular sports.

Baseball can trace its origins back to the days of William the Conqueror in England around 1085. Throughout the last thousand years games that resembled baseball have been mentioned in literature and historical texts. There was even mention of a game called “base” in letters home from Valley Forge during the American Revolution. Jane Austin mentions in her classic Northanger Abbey, “it was not very wonderful that Catherine should prefer cricket, base-ball, riding on horseback, and running about the country, at the age of fourteen, to books”. The first organized baseball club in America was the New York Knickerbockers in 1842. Alexander Cartwright and Dr. Lucius Adams formulated the original rules in 1845 that form the foundation of modern-day baseball. The first league was established in New York during the 1850’s. Baseball was a diversion for prisoners of war during the Civil War and the first paid professional league was started in 1871 in New York City. In 1903 the first World Series was played.

In 1823 a game resembling modern-day American football was played in merry old England. The game was quickly adopted in the United States on the collegiate level. Schools such as Harvard and Princeton played as early as the mid 1800’s but organized games weren’t played until after the Civil War. In 1860 in Boston the first high school football games took place. These early contests were a hybrid of rugby and soccer and it wasn’t until 1873 that rules were set to paper. During the late 19th century a man named Walter Camp influenced the adoption of a whole new set of rules. The father of American football, Camp, reduced the field from its original dimensions of 140x70 yards to the more conventional 110x53 yards. Camp also reduced the number of players per side from 15 to 11, developed a system of downs, and called for the center snap. By 1895 professional football had begun. In 1921 the American Professional Football Association adopted its first set of bylaws and expanded to 22 teams. In ’22 the APFA changed its name to the National Football League.

Both sports are literally replete with mythical moments that will live for eternity in the pantheon of American sports. Baseball has Bobby Thompson’s homerun off Ralph Branca in 1951, the legendary “The Shot heard Round the World”. Football has Dwight Clark’s touchdown thrown by Joe Montana, a.k.a. “The Catch”. Baseball has the infamous ninth inning collapse of the Boston Red Sox in the 1986 World Series against the Mets where Bill Buckner let a little dribbler slip through the wickets giving millions of Sox faithful nightmares for nearly twenty years. Football has “The Drive” where John Elway led the Denver Broncos on a game tying 98 yard drive with five minutes left to send the 1986 AFC Championship game to overtime. The Broncos eventually won and Cleveland Browns fans and Marty Shottenheimer have yet to exorcize the ghosts of that game. Baseball has Don Larson’s no-hitter. Football has Joe Montana’s last minute game winning drive in Super Bowl XXIII. Baseball has Sammy Sosa’s and Mark McGuire’s epic run at the once fabled 61 homerun mark and Cal Ripken’s consecutive games streak. Football has Dan Marino’s all out assault on the record books and Jerry Rice’s staggering numbers.

Both sports also have their fair share of super stars. Men such as Willie Mays, Mickey Mantle, Babe Ruth, Barry Bonds, Ted Williams, Satchel Page, Roger Clemens, Sandy Koufax, and Steve Carlton are deities amongst fans of America’s pastime. Likewise, stars like Lawrence Taylor, Jim Brown, Dick Butkus, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, John Elway, Dan Marino, Barry Sanders, Ronnie Lott, and Reggie White will live on forever in the minds of football fans.

Some of the most colorful nick-names in sports were spawned on the diamond or gridiron. The Sultan of Swat, The Galloping Ghost, The Splendid Splinter, Crazy Legs, The Yankee Clipper, The Minister of Defense, Mr. October, The Rocket, Tombstone (the best nick name in sports history, IMO), Night Train, The Say Hey Kid, Dizzy, Stan the Man, Hammerin’ Hank, The Wizard of Oz, The Big Unit (sounds like a porn star’s name), The Assassin, Mean Joe, Broadway Joe, Sweetness, The Freak, and Prime Time became synonymous with the games’ biggest stars.

Where the separation between the two sports occurs is in the athletes. While the toughest feat in sports is hitting a baseball there really can be no argument that the best athletes reside on the football field. The likes of Barry Bonds, Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez, and Jim Edmonds are great athletes but they don’t even compare to an even average NFL player or even those in college football. Players in the NFL routinely run the forty in 4.3 seconds or better. It says something when the best athlete to ever play baseball, Bo Jackson, was also a football player. While sheer athletic ability doesn’t translate to being a gifted baseball player you must be a sensational athlete to play football. You must be physically strong and tough to even survive in the NFL but the same requirements cannot be said to exist for baseball. The main requirement for baseball is supreme hand-eye coordination, a feat which can be found in a professional billiards player.

There really is no disputing baseball’s historical significance in 20th Century America. Not only has baseball been a constant in the lexicon of our society it has been at the forefront of many turbulent and ground shaking events. The Black Sox scandal where members of the 1919 Chicago White Sox were accused, confessed, and eventually banned from baseball for life shook the foundation of sports. This event forever changed the way we viewed sports and tainted the reputation of the only significant professional sports league in America at the time. This sordid episode also shoved the problems of gambling and organized crime into the lime light.

However, the most important event in major sports history and perhaps in 20th century American history was Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in baseball in 1947. Branch Rickey, then owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers, had the courage to do what no one else did, hire an African-American player to play the nation’s most visible sport on its biggest stage, in New York. Up until ’47 baseball had been a staunchly all-white institution while hundreds of gifted black players starred in the now legendary Negro Leagues. Josh Gibson, Satchel Paige, Cool Papa Bell, Pee Wee Butts, Smokey Joe Williams, and other gifted black baseball players toiled away in relative obscurity while their arguably inferior white counterparts dominated the major leagues. All this for the sake of racial segregation.

That is until a man with a vision, Branch Rickey, chose to make a historical statement. Jackie Robinson was not chosen because he was the best Negro Leaguer but because he was the best suited to endure the hatred that awaited him in the majors. Had the best player from the Negro Leagues been chosen the unbelievably talented and volatile Josh Gibson would have begged to break down the door for blacks in MLB but Rickey knew that Gibson’s arrogance and abrasiveness would have alienated the very fans he desperately wanted to embrace this experiment. And in Robinson Branch Rickey found the perfect marriage of talent and temperament. Robinson proved to be the right choice and he became the ambassador everyone hoped he would be. Jackie Robinson’s dignity and unflappable nature forever changed the climate of race relations in America.

Football has no such claim on historical significance, unless you examine its effects on American pop culture. The 1958 NFL Championship between the Baltimore Colts and New York Giants is generally regarded as the first defining moment in sports television history and the moment when the NFL “arrived” on the scene. Since that night almost every major advancement in sports broadcasting has been pioneered in football. In 1970 the NFL and ABC struck a deal that would thrust football into the spot light forever. Monday Night Football drew huge audiences and massive advertising revenue. The marriage of football and TV was consummated, an arrangement that would vault the NFL into the position as America’s most watched, most followed, and most popular sport. The Super Bowl has become a cultural mainstay and a global phenomenon. It’s been estimated that over 1.5 billion people in 150 different countries tune in to what is arguably the single biggest sporting event on the planet outside soccer’s World Cup.

What is striking when you examine these two sports side by side is the overall health of the respective power structures. Since 1987 when the players union in the NFL was broken by a labor war with the owners (in 1993 after free agency was fully implemented the NFLPA was reformed as a union) there has been very little acrimony between players and owners. In fact not a single game has been lost due to labor disputes in the NFL since the ’87 strike. Since the 80’s the NFL has adopted a salary cap, comprehensive revenue sharing, a strict drug policy, and TV revenues and attendance figures remain steady. The NFL is now one of the strongest and most lucrative professional sports leagues in the world.

The same can’t be said about Major League Baseball. In 1994 baseball ceased operations ending one of the most exciting seasons in that sport’s history. Before play was stopped and the World Series cancelled for only the second time in one hundred years Tony Gwynn was making a run at .400 season average, Matt Williams was on pace to break Roger Maris’ 61 home run mark, and the Montreal Expos with the lowest payroll in the league were in first place. Only in the last couple years has baseball attracted fans on the scale seen before ’94. And trouble still looms large on the horizon. Last year baseball finally adopted some semblance of a drug testing policy but the specter of steroids threatens to unravel the fabric of the most hallowed records in the game. Barry Bonds’ 73 HR’s in 2001, Mark McGuire’s 70 in ’98, and Sammy Sosa’s 66 & 63 in ’98 & ’99 all come with significant baggage. The death of Ken Caminiti, the admitted steroid use of Jason Giambi, and the cloud constantly hovering over Bonds’ head suggests that baseball still has an extremely difficult time policing itself. This is due to a dysfunctional brain trust that is more bent on reaping the spoils of war than in preserving the sport. Bud Selig is a puppet of the owners and his arch nemesis Donald Fehr is the Don Corlione of the players’ union. These two have had more public spats than Al & Peg Bundy. Together Fehr and Selig have worked in concert to destroy whatever credibility baseball may have once had. Franchise success in baseball is largely due to deep pockets rather than to professional competency. Why else would the Yankees be able to compete year in & year out for a World Series trophy despite having possibly the worst minor league development system in the game? Simple, because George Steinbrenner has the deepest pockets in the league.

Baseball for the most part is a rich get richer kind of league whereas football has a genuine competitive balance. In order to compete in the NFL you need to be an astute talent evaluator, be a master mathematician, and relate well to fans and players alike. In baseball you need only have a fat TV deal, a gilded bank roll, and a willingness to shell out $2.5 million a year for an average middle reliever. In 1998 the NFL inked $17.8 billion in network television deals, that averages out to about $73.3 million per team per year. The average Major League Baseball franchise clears barely $11 million a year from network TV. Even if you factor in local television revenue the NFL still dwarfs MLB in the TV wars.

Another symptom of baseball’s dysfunction is the manner in which it flaunts its antitrust exemption. Baseball is the only major industry in America that has an exemption from antitrust laws. This means that teams can’t move without league approval, control of individual franchises can be stripped from owners (ask Marge Schott), and the league can contract teams at any time. Bud Selig flirted with this idea a couple years ago and the Expos and the Minnesota Twins were nearly wiped off the major league landscape. Instead the Expos were shipped to Washington D.C. to become the Senators. Another little ancillary effect of the antitrust exemption is that collusion amongst the individual teams has been commonplace, especially during the era of free agency. In the late 80’s the MLBPA filed three different grievances against the owners violating the anti-collusion clause of the 1976 Collective Bargaining Agreement. An independent arbitrator found that baseball owners were indeed guilty of collusion and awarded the players union a $280 million settlement.

When you view the picture as a whole you find that undoubtedly football is a better sport. You don’t find the acrimony between owners and players that exists in baseball, there is not the ominous presence of a massive steroid scandal that exists in baseball, and the athletes are superior in football. While baseball will always lay claim to being the more historically important sport the fact that the powers that be are a moronic band of nincompoops will always be, pardon the pun, strike one against our nation’s pastime. Strike two is the steroid problems baseball still refuses to address properly. And strike three is the nature of labor relations. The ’94 season was lost and it will happen again…guaranteed. Football is by far a more sound business entity with a more marketable product. I’ve weighed the merits, examined the history, and dissected the facts. The verdict is in and football is king.



Date

Sun 06/04/06, 3:55 pm EST

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
1279 days ago
Score -1+-
A good article would be which sport will be king in 100 years. Personally, I think it is going to be ice hockey. There is far more action during a hockey game, as compared to football. The only problem with hockey is how to properly broadcast it on TV & how to market. Those problems can and will be overcome. So don't be surprise if our grandkids say Hockey, instead of football, is king.
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1279 days ago
Score 3+-
I think fantasy football is the difference maker. It's very easy to play, because you only have to pay attention once a week, and you only have to know about 20% of the players. Plus, it's really simple -- there's no tradeoff like in baseball where you have to give up steals to get homers (or whatever).
Permalink | Reply
SteaksammichRed-Shirting
1279 days ago
Score 4+-
It sounds like you make a pretty good case...in favor of baseball. Baseball does indeed have a much richer history and requires much more talent. And, despite the salary caps, baseball has much more competitive balance than football where the New England Patriots have won 3 Super Bowls in the last 5 years and nearly the same teams make the playoffs every year. In baseball we've had a different champ each of the last 6 years and nearly every team (besides the Royals and Pirates) have a shot to win just about every year. Football is a fun time for people to get together once a week, get drunk, and eat til they explode, but it has nothing to do with the game on tv. Baseball envokes extreme devotion from its fans who devote time and energy to following the sport every day. Football is a good sports and all, but it's no baseball.
Permalink | Reply
SteaksammichRed-Shirting
1279 days ago
Score 0+-
Well...yeah....but fantasy football sucks. A lot. The fact that you don't need to have any strategy and the fact that you don't need to know most of the players are big negatives.
Permalink | Reply
DNLLegend
1279 days ago
Score 0+-
Steak -- it makes it easier to play. There's definitely a lot of strategy involved, and an advanced player can beat the typical "buy a mag and draft" players with ease.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1279 days ago
Score 1+-
Steak, puh-leez. I acknowledged hitting a baseball is the toughest thing in sports. But to contend that the athletes in baseball are comperable to even average football players is laughable. I also acknowledged baseball's glorious history. Once again, the legacy of racial interation is sulleyed by the '94 work stoppage, the currect steroid scandal, and the cloud that gambling has cast over the sport. Yes there have been five champs in five years but there's one team, one, who's won nearly one out of every four championships...the Yankees. Then add the Cardinals 9, Red Sox 6, and five teams with five titles, you get 65 of the 102, or 64%, of the Series wins by seven teams. There was virtually no competetive balance throughout the 30's-60's. And now, realistically, there are more like seven teams that have no shot of winning a World Series...Tampa, Colorado, KC, Brewers, Seattle, Cubs, and San Diego. In football, realistically, only four teams have no shot...Tennessee, Oakland, Detroit, and Green Bay...ok, maybe Minnesota. At least in football the teams start the season on a level playing field (ha, I'm so damn clever), same cannot be said of MLB.
Permalink | Reply
SteaksammichRed-Shirting
1279 days ago
Score 0+-
It's easier to play, but that doesn't make it as good. The tradeoffs in fantasy baseball add a lot more strategy then you could ever hope to find in football. Do you draft a pitcher with one or your top picks? Do you take a flyer on a promising prospect? Do you take the 20 steals over the 30 homers? In football you just need to grab whatever guy has the most points. There's not much more to it than that. The guys who know what they're doing do have an advantage, but in baseball you -have- to know what you're doing.
Permalink | Reply
SteaksammichRed-Shirting
1279 days ago
Score 4+-
I'm definately not saying baseball players are better athletes, you're right about that. Any sport that CC Sabathia can dominate in means that athleticism isn't a top factor. But it's the skill that I like. Catching a football takes more athleticism, but there's nothing harder in sports than trying to hit tiny, blazing fast, moving ball with a little stick.

The steroid scandal is giving baseball a bad name and there have been bigger cases of gambling....but I'm willing to bet that there are probably more football players who are unclean and football is a much bigger sport for gambling than baseball. That sort of stuff never bothered me anyways. I don't give a damn who took steroids...I just want to watch the game.

Milwaukee, Colorado, San Diego, and Chicago all have a shot to win their division this year. It may not be a great shot, but with weak divisions and the right amount of luck they can take it. Sure, we'd all love a level field in baseball and a salary cap, but even without it there are plenty of competitive teams.
Permalink | Reply
CoreyisarealboyMajor Leaguer
1279 days ago
Score 4+-
I would like to point out here that a lot can happen in 100 games, so I wouldn't write off teams like Colorado, Milwaukee, and San Diego quite yet. Although they're struggling, we saw what Houston did last year, and the only reason Tampa has no shot is because they're in the toughest division in baseball, yet they're still only a few games under .500. With a good farm system and proper player development, any major league team can field a competitive club. The teams that usually struggle in this capacity are the ones with the money to throw around. The GMs of baseball have to collectively watch about five teams day in and day out and have it a lot tougher than the GMs of football, who mostly do absolutely nothing but keep proving their all idiots.
Permalink | Reply
Angels FanJV Squad
1279 days ago
Score 4+-
The main difference I see with the sports of Baseball and Football is that in Baseball, any of the 9 players playing for a team has a realistic chance of making a major contribution to the game that directly influences winning or losing. In football, half the players just push each other back and forth all game and rarely if ever have an opportunity to make a game defining play.
Permalink | Reply
ShrubberyVarsity Captain
1279 days ago
Score 1+-
Steak, living here in Denver I can confidently say the Rockies have no shot, period. Maybe next year when they mature and Barmes, Holliday, and Atkins learn more, they could be stellar. And their staff ERA is the lowest in team history.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1279 days ago
Score 0+-
Angels Fan, please say you were kidding. The O and D lines make a tremendous difference, it's just less easy to see than "this RB just ran for 50 yards, what a play!". Denver's OL has made a ton of running backs look good over the years, even Ron fricking Dayne. That "pushing back and forth" is probably the most important thing that happens on the field. A team with bad lines will struggle, no matter how good their "skill position" players are.
Permalink | Reply
Angels FanJV Squad
1279 days ago
Score 3+-
Anonymous Fanatic - I think you make my point when you say that the OL and DL make a tremendous difference. My point is that any of the 9 individual players on the baseball team can make a significant contribution to winning - you point out that the OL or DL make the difference - baseball is much more of an individual sport. When was the last time a offensive tackle was highlighted as the key player of a game? I haven't played any fantasy football, but I seriously doubt that someone is going to use a first round draft pick to take a center - while in baseball, any position can provide the same level of offense and defence (in fantasy or the real game).
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1278 days ago
Score 1+-
While hitting a major league pitch may be the hardest thing in sports, please never try to say that baseball requires more talent than football. It requires a different skill, completely. If you want to try to compare the talent level head to head, let baseball players take the beating football players do and see how they handle it.
Permalink | Reply
Ray agmJV Squad
1278 days ago
Score 2+-
The most interesting aspect of baseball to me is the fact that the numbers actually matter...this makes it feel less like a kid's hobby and more like an activity with substance and a little science behind it, which makes it very appealing for me personally. Football is a great sport, I'm into fantasy and I watch the games...but it seems more like a hobby instead of something to ponder and contemplate, as I do with baseball. I am also fully aware of the complexities and intricacies in football, both on the offensive and defensive side...but there is a lot of random luck that happens, which adds to the unpredictability but takes from the analysis side of the game. Maybe someday someone will develop a sabre-like approach to football, although I do think it's impossible due to the limited number of games. I don't know, it's hard to explain the attraction of baseball and sometimes hard to explain to others. Most people tell me it's boring, and in many cases it is, but there are quite a few layers underneath what you see on the field and that's what makes it fascinating.
Permalink | Reply
BRGJV Squad
1278 days ago
Score 0+-
Bo Jackson was the best athlete in baseball? How do you get that--- given that in no area do his stats top the MLB charts?
Permalink | Reply
BRGJV Squad
1278 days ago
Score 0+-
I have to say that the only sport I care about is baseball. You couldn't make me watch a football game even if you paid me -- the violence just turns me off. Even in ice hockey, which is thought of as a violent sport, you don't have 22 players running AT each other on every play. But some people like the violence, and I guess that's why football is so popular. Me, I'd rather see the kind of game where from play to play the situation is different. You just don't play the same way with 2 outs and nobody on base as you do with no outs and bases loaded -- and even if the outs and men-on-base are the same, you don't play the same way with a .200 hitter at bat as with a .350 hitter. I don't see why people say football is such a strategic game -- every play looks alike to me: 11 players line up against 11, one throws the ball back to another, and everone piles up on the ball carrier to knock him to the ground. What strategy?
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Football_vs._Baseball:_An_In-Depth_Comparison"

This page was last modified 21:26, 4 June 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise