armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Fame

12
Vote

by user Matt Waters

I say this. You just can’t leave the Hall of Fame to people. It isn’t reasonable. How are you going to ask people, I mean, people for Christ sakes, to judge the merits of their peers? Are you kidding me?

 

People fail at judgment. There’s this great word floating around Webster’s defined as hypocrisy, a label that at least 97 percent of the population falls under. To be a hypocrite is a great and noble thing, because you fit in. I’d be a liar if I didn’t cop to my own hypocrisy at times. How are we supposed to judge a person’s career properly if we fail in even judging ourselves?

 

/

You know something?  I empathize with the writer who submitted an empty ballot in last year’s election. Sure, it’s a scummy move that cheapened the supposedly sacred voting process in the name of publicity, but he really had the right idea.  Why should sportswriters be allowed to decide something so utterly important? There are fantastic sports scribes out there, without a doubt. But, for every open minded, hard working, earnest caretaker of the game, there are the shameless, the self-promoting and hypocritical, the irrational and inflexible. Just like people, just like life. 

 

Honestly, how is Goose Gossage not a Hall of Famer?  I mean, is there a valid, concrete reason for the decisions of these voters?

 

Or do we just get spineless rhetoric, empty, yet emphatic sentiment, questioning the “dominance” of a particular player? Joe Sportswriter opines that Jack Morris wasn’t the “dominating” pitcher of the era. When a sportswriter ponders the “dominance” of a player, all they are admitting is that this player, for whatever reason, didn’t appeal to their tastes, didn’t forcefully forge a conclave in their memory, solely a manner of opinion. Perception isn’t reality, yet the two are constantly mistaken.

 

/

 

Bert Blyleven isn’t in the Hall because some random guy 20 years ago decided he was good, just not great. Who was the guy?

 

No one knows.

 

But one thing is for sure. Whatever guy it was that started such a completely unfounded, untrue idea, must have been pretty influential, because his blueprint is still being followed to this day.

 

See, there are no plausible, sensible reasons.

 

This can apply to the positively wacky Hall of Fame voting, where Dante Bichette can grab a couple of votes purely for giggles, or any other affair in this wide world we live in.

 

There will always be a segment of the population that follows the crowd. Never mind if the herd is wading slowly into a bottomless lagoon labeled ignorance, if there exists enough, than they will be followed, no questions asked.

 

/

 

Should steroid guys be elected into the Hall of Fame?

 

What about relievers, becoming more and more valuable by the season, and whose merits need to be acknowledged?

 

These are complicated queries that our future voters just will not be able to analyze with an even hand.

 

Mass stupidity will surely ensue.

 

To wit:

 

A slugger will get elected to the Hall of Fame, on the basis of a spotless record entwined with strong statistics.

 

15 years later, one random night on an empty country road, his car will be pulled over by the local police department, after weaving erratically all over the road.

 

The cops will investigate his car, only after he pukes all over them of course, and discover steroid vials in his trunk, right next to his Hall of Fame plaque and an empty bag of Doritos.

 

Only one thing can be certain: the fallout will be mind numbingly stupid.

 

Talk radio callers will vent, the invention of the Internet continuing to allude them. They will demand the slugger’s name and accomplishments repealed from the Hall of Fame. They will wallow in the tragedy of lost greatness. They will bemoan their kids, who have nobody to look up to anymore, not like they did, when President Rodriguez broke the home run record clean and was a role model to the youth all across America.

 

Confusion will reign.

 

When the dust settles, and the slugger is removed from Cooperstown, quoted in a Sports Illustrated column that he doesn’t really give a damn about the fans and “I’ll still be eating a steak dinner tonight”, nobody will learn anything.

 

There will still be glass heroes, paper villains, and empty morals to uphold.

 

My question is: why bother with all the nonsense?

 

Turn that beautiful building in Cooperstown into a museum.

 

Put an end to the hypocrisy entrenched in the voting process, and the paradoxes it produces, where Ty Cobb is a Hall of Fame person and player, and Mark McGwire is not.

 

Acknowledge Baseball’s entire history, the good, the bad, and the ugly.

 

We need to stop pretending. We need to embrace reality, and learn from our mistakes, instead of masking them with simplicity.

 

Life is complicated. People do wrong, sometimes. These errors shouldn’t be in vain.

 

The Hall should proudly exhibit Baseball’s best drunks, juicers, and amphetamine users.

 

/

 

Have a plaque of Raffy Palmeiro, pointing his finger in defiance.

 

Have a plaque of Barry Bonds, with an enlarged dome.

 

Tell a story, not a fairy tale.

 

/

 

The Hall of Fame is a great idea.

 

Allowing the “experts” to vote players into it is a great idea.

 

Safeguarding the game’s legacy from the ugliness imparted by steroids is a great idea.

 

But in life, there are ideas, and there is reality… and both are kind of messed up sometimes.

 

Live and learn.

 

 


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
MegECass110AAA-er
873 days ago
Score 1+-
Very interesting concept, I like the idea of not having opinionated writers vote based on their opinions. Even though many times athletes voted in are close to unanimous decisions, the whole thing stirs up unnecessary debates over who should be in or out. Michael Lewis writes in the epilogue of Moneyball about baseball being one giant, exclusive club that doesn't want to open up membership to non-traditional players or executives in the game. I couldn't agree more, and this echoes that sentiment. Great work.
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
873 days ago
Score 0+-
There's a lot of BS in baseball nowadays. Controversy over steroids, the Home Run Derby, Hall of Fame, etc. Many things in baseball before the steroid era should be more popular nowadays because it a lot of things clarified that a certain team or player was the best. A lost of things now mean things that are pointless. Like the single season home run record. Plus, milestones are getting filled with more and more people, so guys like Gossage might not be looked at one of the greats; I'm not saying he isn't but he would've been a LOT more popular if he pitched in the '60s. Gossage has 300+ saves. So? A lot of people have 300 saves; that'll be what voters will say. I think it has to do a lot with the era you're in, as well as the popularity you have...
Permalink | Reply
Matt WatersWaterboy
873 days ago
Score 0+-
Meg- the baseball "club." See the players bowing down to Barry Bonds at the All Star Game. And Money Ball was great. I love, how at the end of the book, how Lewis reasons that smart teams like the A's owe their success to ignorance, it allows for their success. Lewis is awesome.

Thanks for reading, y'all. Oh, and Romiezzo, the fact that Goosage isn't in the Hall of Fame is a joke. You know who was really under-rated, though? This guy.

http://www.b...ulke01.shtml

Too bad his career got off to such a late start.
Permalink | Reply
KelsdadAll-Star
873 days ago
Score 0+-
Gossage isn't a Hall of Famer. Good pitcher, not great.
Permalink | Reply
Matt WatersWaterboy
873 days ago
Score 0+-
Kelsdad, you are certainly entitled. I should rephrase: I think it's a joke that Gossage isn't in the H.O.F. IF Sutter is. In the interest of consistency, ‘ya know.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Fame"

This page was last modified 03:20, 12 July 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise