armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Examining A Last Place Team

13
Vote

by user The shark

join the 'chair!
Disagree with this article?
Think you can do better?
Write an article on ArmchairGM!
Click here.

A study of the Philadelphia Phillies of 1930 will offer baseball fans a fascinating paradox, as well as a snapshot of what the game was like in an era gone by. This was a team who won only 52 games while losing 102. That's good for a miniscule winning percentage of .338 - and one that ranks among the worst in baseball history. Taken by itself, that is a pretty innocuous fact. After all, there have been baseball teams losing 100 games in a single season for at least 100 years. But if you subsequently consider that this team compiled the third highest team batting average in baseball history, you begin to understand the oddity. Chuck Klein compiled 250 hits and posted a .386 batting average. Lefty O'Doul added 202 hits and a .383 average. And for good measure, throw in Pinky Whitney along with his 207 hits and .342 mark and you may begin to wonder how a .315 batting average as a team is rewarded by a last-place finish?

The answer is both simple and not so simple. And, in both cases, it's pitching. On the surface, the numbers are very telling: a 6.71 team ERA, a league-high 1,199 runs allowed (the most runs allowed by one pitching staff in MLB history), and an absolutely ridiculous 1,993 hits allowed in 1,373 innings. The "ace" of the staff was Phil Collins, who went 16-11 and posted an ERA of 4.78 (the best on the team among pitchers who threw more than 30 innings). The other starters? Ray Benge (11-15, 5.69), Les Sweetland (7-15, 7.71), Claude Willoughby (4-17, 7.59). (See all starters' 1930 stats at the bottom of the page.) It's not all that much of a stretch to realize that no matter what your offense is able to contribute, overcoming such brutally futile pitching would be an understandably insurmountable task.

But an even closer look reveals some incredible clarity.

  • In games in which they scored 5 or more runs, the 1930 Phillies won just 42 of 90. That's a winning percentage of .467. In comparison, from 1901 through 2004, MLB teams that have scored 5 or more runs in a game have compiled a winning percentage of .779.
  • The 1930 Phils lost 18 games in which they scored 8 or more runs, and 6 games in which they scored 15 or more times!
  • In fact, on back-to-back days (July 23rd and 24th), the Phightin' Phils lost 16-15 to the Pittsburgh Pirates and 19-15 to the Chicago Cubs.
  • On May 30, they lost both ends of a double-header to the Cubs, surrendering 11 runs in each game.
  • Over the course of the season, the pitching staff allowed 10 or more runs a mind-boggling 43 times! Or, if you prefer, in 27.5% of their games!

If nothing else, this case study should serve as one of the best examples in history of the old axiom "good pitching will beat good hitting".

The 1930 Philadelphia Phillies starting Pitchers

<stats> Player=Phil Collins Type=Pitching Years=1930 </stats>


<stats> Player=Les Sweetland Type=Pitching Years=1930 </stats>


<stats> Player=Claude Willoughby Type=Pitching Years=1930 </stats>


<stats> Player=Ray Benge Type=Pitching Years=1930 </stats>




Date

Sun 09/17/06, 6:42 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
BWWWaterboy
1168 days ago
Score 1+-
Good stuff. One of the best offensive teams ever and one of the worst pitching teams ever in the same clubhouse. Wonder how they got along...
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1168 days ago
Score 0+-
me thinks they were heavy drinkers...
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1168 days ago
Score 2+-
Awesome research. Very interesting. Almost reminds me of the Reds of five or six years ago.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1168 days ago
Score 3+-
or any Rockies team
Permalink
The sharkDraft Pick
1168 days ago
Score 2+-
Check out those "WHIP" numbers. You don't see a WHIP over 2.00 very often - especially over the course of 153. That is really bad.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
1168 days ago
Score 1+-
Ahhh, the 1930 Phillies... EASILY the best of the Phils' 84 last place teams...
Permalink | Reply
Jgov05All-American
1168 days ago
Score 0+-
Look at the lack of strikeouts! None of them K'd up even 100 with all the innings they pitched.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1167 days ago
Score 0+-
mark brunell strikes out every time, has a .000 BA, and he doesnt even play baseball thats how much he sucks, it spreads into other sports!
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
1167 days ago
Score 0+-
seth is gay
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Examining_A_Last_Place_Team"

This page was last modified 23:58, 16 July 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise