armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Contrived? Yes. Exciting? You bet.

8
Vote

by user J Cunningham

The Chase for the Nextel Cup is in its third season, and I can officially say I've turned a corner on it. When the head honchos over at NASCAR cooked up this 10-race playoff formula, I was skeptical, believing the system at the time worked fine, despite Matt Kensseth's runaway championship.

But Mike Helton decided he needed to spice things up, keep interest in the sport in September, October, and November--coincidentally, the three months NASCAR goes head-to-head against the NFL on TV.

Let's not kid ourselves, though; nobody--certainly not auto racing--is going to trump the NFL. Professional football is king on American television, and the sooner everyone realizes it, the better.

But after last Saturday night's thrilling, and somewhat shocking, Chevy Rock 'n' Roll 400 at Richmond, I'm finally willing to admit I'm down with the excitement the Chase for the Cup generates.

Is the formula contrived, designed to create excitement where otherwise there might not be? Of course.

But does it work? Damn straight it does.

Under the 10-race format, the top 10 in points are separated by just five points. So if Jeff Gordon were to end the 26th race of the season with a 250-point lead, all but five points of that would be gone. Under this formula, the 10th-place driver is only 45 points behind the leader.

And with 10 races to determine who takes home the big trophy, a 45-point cushion is nothing.

Most of the tracks in the Chase are the standard variety--anywhere from one to one-and-a-half miles in length--but two tracks will undoubtedly stand out: Talladega and Martinsville.

Talladega, the largest track in the Nextel Cup Series at 2.66 miles, is one of two places the cars runs horsepower-robbing restrictor plates, a package resulting in large packs of cars, often three-wide and 30 deep. Not only is this a recipe for exciting racing for the fans in the stands and on TV, but it's also a recipe for disaster for the drivers.

Those not in the know should look up the term "The Big One."

Martinsville, the shortest track on the Cup circuit at only 0.528 miles, is your typical short track. Lots of rubbing, lots of beating and banging, lots of torn-up sheet metal. Tempers are shorter than usual at a short track, meaning anyone at any point could just pop off and wreck someone.

And that someone could be a Chase contender.

So despite the glaring fact that the Chase was cooked up to create drama, it succeeds. Even if somneone runs away with the title in the last 10 races--the way Tony Stewart did last year--there's still enough drama in positions 2 though 10.

There's even drama to see who finishes 11th, because that lucky driver gets a cool $1 million and a seat at the awards banquet in New York City in December.

All of which equates to very happy sponsors.

But enough about how great this ultimately contrived formula is: who's going to win the 2006 Nextel Cup championship? I could be honest and tell you I don't know, but then this wouldn't be a very good opinion, now would it?

So instead, I'll break down each of the top 10 drivers, examining who has the best chance of all the Chasers.

1. Matt Kenseth: The 2003 champion is probably the least-noticed driver on account of his dry, boring personality. But there's no denying Kenseth's driving ability--or his team's talent in the pits. Don't overlook Kenseth, who is almost always strong at the 1.5-mile tracks.

But Talladega and Martinsville could be his pitfalls. He survives those, Kenseth has a great chance of winning the Cup.

2. Jimmie Johnson: The points leader for much of the regular season, Johnson has a lot going for him--most notably Daytona 500 and Brickyard 400 victories. But he's hit his annual slump before the Chase, and I wonder if he can bounce back from a series of unspectacular finishes.

He is going to a lot of tracks he's good at--most notably Lowe's, Martinsville, and Homestead--so if Chad Knaus can get the 48 bunch back in tow, I give Jimmie a great chance to win it all.

3. Kevin Harvick: We'll call Harvick--the winner at Richmond last Saturday night and polesitter for this weekend's Sylvania 300 at New Hampshire--Mr. Momentum, because that's on his side as the boys enter the Chase. The boy's been driving the wheels off the race car, no doubt about that.

Harvick could become the first driver ever to win the Cup and Busch Series titles in the same season. What a feat that would be.

4. Kyle Busch: The lesser evil of the two Busch brothers, Kyle certainly has the talent and the equipment to win the title, and a few tracks he runs well at, such as Phoenix and Dover, are on the schedule. But he's really young, and still gets rattled easily.

It wouldn't surprise me if Busch won the title, but it wouldn't surprise me if he finished 10th, either.

5. Denny Hamlin: The driver nobody expected to see in the Chase, Hamlin is the first rookie to qualify. Despite the inexperience, I give Hamlin a good shot, simply because nobody'll see it coming. He's got championship backing in Joe Gibbs Racing (and teammate Tony Stewart, who surprisingly isn't in this year's Chase field), so don't count the boy out.

No rookie has ever won a Cup championship.

6. Dale Earnhardt Jr.: Rebounding nicely from missing the Chase last year, Earnhardt has reunited with crew chief Tony Eury Jr. While I like how the team runs on all kinds of tracks this year, I think the Budweiser team is still one year away.

He'll make some noise--especially at Talladega, Atlanta, and Phoenix--but Junior won't hoist the trophy until at least 2007.

7. Mark Martin: The sentimental favorite, the guy who's finished second in the points four times in his career. He'll likely hang 'em up after Haomestead, but there's nothing saying Martin can't win the title in his last full season.

He's got the talent, the car, and the team.

8. Jeff Burton: If NASCAR gave out a Comeback Driver of the Year award, I'd give it to this guy. Burton's had a resurgence of sorts this year in the No. 31 car, qualifying and running up front nearly every week...

...at least until the halfway point. Then things seem to go awry. Nice story, but Burton's not winning the Cup.

9. Jeff Gordon: Never count Gordon out of any championship chase. I realize he missed the Chase last year, and he's struggled of late, but when you put the trophy on the line, Gordon and the No. 24 team go at it.

There's a reason this guy's got four Cup trophies in his house.

10. Kasey Kahne: He leads the series in wins, yet had to race his way into the Chase. Between winning at California and finishing third at Richmond, Kahne also has momentum on his side. He's won at Atlanta, Texas, and Lowe's, all of which are on the Chase schedule.

His potential hang-ups? Talladega and Martinsville.

My Winner: Kevin Harvick.


Date

Fri 09/15/06, 8:06 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Anonymous Fanatic #1
1196 days ago
Score 0+-
Holy Crap! Someone DOES care about NASCAR!!!
Permalink | Reply
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1196 days ago
Score 0+-
Yeah...everywhere I go, I seem to be the only one. :P
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1195 days ago
Score 0+-
NASCAR is still on the second tier to F1 in my book...
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1195 days ago
Score 0+-
This system used to operate in Formula One until the early 1960s, the only reason being that it was too much to expect the drivers to go to all the races all over Europe. So they took, e.g. the best four of six results. When times changed in the 1960s, and the old Grands Prix calendars, e.g. GP-1935 were beginning to end, and just the national Grands Prix remained, this rule was abolished. I prefer the every race counts rule. It is possible under this system for, e.g. two drivers to win 10 races each and tie with perfect scores...
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1195 days ago
Score 0+-
Also, why does NASCAR have a dominance of ovals? What's wrong with Road America, Laguna Seca, Sears Point, and places in Canada such as Mosport Park, Mont Treblant? These give more variety than ovals, IMO.
Permalink | Reply
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1195 days ago
Score 0+-
Have you ever actually seen NASCAR road course races? Boring as hell; I wish they'd get rid of the two they have now; nothing more than follow-the-leader-and-try-not-to-spin-off-the-course.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1194 days ago
Score 0+-
No but having seen F1 races around the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, I know that road courses are much more interesting. Some circuits are real shockers, admittedly, (the Hungaroring springs to mind]], but the likes of Mosport Park, Road America and Laguna Seca are great for overtaking. It adds variety to the race, a computer can drive around an oval, whereas it struggles around any decent road course. 250 laps of an oval is boring when compared to, e.g. 60 laps or so of Istanbul, or Monza, the older configurations of the Hockenheimring etc.
Permalink
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
1194 days ago
Score 0+-
I think part of it's the fact that stock cars aren't really built for road courses; they're so bulky and aero-sensitive that a twisty, winding road course doesn't really suit them. The F1 cars, on the other hand--not to mention IndyCars--are sleeker and lighter, better suited to handle those kinds of courses. Many NASCAR drivers come up through the American racing ranks, and I would say about 95% of that are short-track ovals. Which explainms 1) why NASCAR runs os many ovals, and 2) why so many NASCAR drivers have trouble on road courses. The successful NASCAR guys on road courses? By and large, the guys with open-wheel experience.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Contrived%3F_Yes._Exciting%3F_You_bet."

This page was last modified 01:38, 16 September 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise