armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Cleveland 1, Boston 0 - Let's Not Go Crazy

11
Vote

by Rawbeezeitz

This article originally appeared on http://bloodsox.blogspot.com

In 1-0 losses, you can look at EVERY single play in the game and say "Well if this was a bit different, then we'd win." If any Red Sox batter hit a homerun in any at-bat, the game gets tied and the Sox might win. If Beckett doesn't allow the solo homerun, the game stays at 0-0. If Crisp doesn't slow down a bit rounding third, he might not get thrown out, and the Sox might have tied.

Coco's getting thrown out might have been the play of the game. There were 2 outs, Crisp was on 2nd, and Ortiz hit a soft grounder to the second baseman, who was playing deep in the overshift. He had no chance at throwing Ortiz out at first, so he threw home. With two outs, Coco was off on contact but he seemed to hesitate a bit on his way home. Victor Martinez caught Barfield's perfect throw, blocked the plate, and may or may not have tagged Crisp out. What matters, though, is that Crisp was called out.

The inning was strange from beginning to end. Cora hit a hard liner, but right at third baseman Casey Blake. Hit just a few inches away, and it's at least a single. Crisp hit the ball much more softly, but right up the middle in no man's land, so he reached on an infield single. Pedroia grounded out. Ortiz hit a very weak groundball. Now, he went 1 for 4 with this infield single being his only hit. If he had gotten a true single, into the outfield, Crisp scores easily and Boston Dirt Dogs isn't making him the goat of the century today. Or let's say Barfield hesitates, or his throw is slightly offline, or the umpire calls Crisp safe, then we aren't bitching and moaning about a hesitation.

I'm one of the most critical Red Sox fans there is. But I'm not all that mad at Coco. He screwed up and slowed down a bit. He made a mistake, let's move on. In 162 games, players will make the occasional mistake. We've all seen Coco's outfield play this season. He's a hustler out there. We've all seen him raise his average from below .200 up near .300 this season. He screwed up, let's move on to the next game.

Let's look at the real reasons we lost this game. We had 7 total baserunners. We struck out 8 times. We grounded into a double play. We had 3 runners thrown out on the basepaths. We went 4 for 27 as a team.

And give credit to Fausto Carmona. He threw a gem. Eight innings, allowed 4 hits, 2 walks, struck out 6, had 11 ground ball outs, and 4 fly outs. He beat us, it's that simple. Beckett pitched great as well. His only real mistake was the homerun. He also went 8 innings, also allowing 4 hits. He walked none and struck out 7. It was one of his best starts of the year, but it was also one of Carmona's as well.

Let's not go nuts about this game. It was a 1-0 game, which always leads to the "We could have won it if..." discussions. But let's consider the previous night's 1-0 win. We would have LOST that if...whatever.

Also, this was the first time two AL teams played 1-0 games against each other, back-to-back, since 1975.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
MegECass110AAA-er
888 days ago
Score 2+-
Agreed. It seems like the consensus is last night was Beckett's best outing in two years, his best since coming to Boston. Can't complain, especially considering what happened to him in Cleveland last year. I just hate to see utter stupidity running the bases (i.e. not hustling, it doesn't matter if the guy in the on deck circle is telling you what to do). But I forgive Coco. Like you said, let's just move on.
Permalink | Reply
RomiezzoLegend
888 days ago
Score 1+-
Exactly, you can't blame the on deck circle guy because you didn't hustle all the way. You should know that you should hustle constantly. Now, if Manny told him to stay up, that's a different story. Beckett pitched amazing compared to last year, but he did give up a home run, but I can't complain. At one point, he retired 13 batters in a row. I'm proud of Beckett, and it was a tough loss for the Sawx. But it's ok, we're moving on. Hopefully, they can do well against Cliff Lee today.
Permalink
InsanMajor Leaguer
888 days ago
Score 0+-
I wouldn't be worried too much about 'if that happened we could've won'. If the Red Sox could score 5 or 6 runs a game like they're supposed to then you wouldn't need to worry about baserunning or stealing. The Red Sox offense is weak right now and they need to pick it up. It's unacceptable that guys making that kind of money aren't to score. On the plus side, it seems like its only a flewk (sp?). They've scored well prior to the last two games.
Permalink | Reply
MegECass110AAA-er
888 days ago
Score 1+-
That'd be fluke.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
888 days ago
Score 2+-
A perfect example of the ball rolling the other way...Tuesdays and Wednesdays games are just baseball statistics evening out...
Permalink | Reply
Baltimoresports247All-American
888 days ago
Score -1+-
The Sox are going to be just fine...the Yanks are streaking now, but their pitching still isn't all that great...they've been winning most games recently because of their bats...The Sox will snap out of it soon...
Permalink | Reply
InsanMajor Leaguer
888 days ago
Score 2+-
The Yankees' pitching has posted a 3.17 ERA in the past 6 games. How is that not good? Plus Pettitte is known for being great in the second half of the season and Philip Hughes will be back next week.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
888 days ago
Score 0+-
Statistically, you might be right, but with a top offense in the league (#2 still?) and a pitching staff that has Clemens, Mussina, Pettite, Wang, Igawa (who'll be replaced by Hughes, eventually)...that's a pretty good staff IMO...

Plus...we're ignoring history and A-Rod almost seems primed for a Bucky Dent-esque moment...

I know, i know, the sox have been and still are pretty far ahead, but don't tell me, especially sox fans, that it doesn't feel like this is a distinct possibility...
Permalink
Interceptor79Varsity
888 days ago
Score 1+-
The Yanks are doing what they do best...win...it's just been a long time coming this season...
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
888 days ago
Score 0+-
New York is taking full advantage of their soft schedule. But in August, things might look differently. 3 games against Cleveland, 7 games against Detroit, 3 against the Angels, and 3 against Boston. That'll be the time for them to either rise, or fall.
Permalink | Reply
Yakob878MVP
888 days ago
Score 0+-
ya they are coming back as they always do. Also its about time Beckett did not get seven runs he has one of the highest run support in the league. Think of this Him and Dice K's records are almost identical but I am not so confident of Beckett in the long run. I am sure he will feel fine though. Thats what I think
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesMajor Leaguer
888 days ago
Score 1+-
OK, we're not going to go crazy, but can we still "party like it's 1999"?
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Cleveland_1%2C_Boston_0_-_Let%27s_Not_Go_Crazy"

This page was last modified 15:18, 26 July 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise