armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Chicago - Nathan Vasher is back..for now

14
Vote

The Chicago Bears' Pro Bowl Cornerback returned Monday for the final week of team activities. Even though he's back, he's not thrilled, still looking for money. Nathan Vasher, a fourth-round pick in 2004, is halfway through a four-year contract that will pay him $425,000 this season, and he believes the Bears should come up with a financial framework that more accurately represents his standing as a rising player.

"There is room for exceptions in everything," Vasher said. "Given the facts, my situation is definitely an exception."

This whole ordeal goes against the Bears business means. Brian Urlacher didn't get a change when he had two years left on his contract. Vasher led the team with 8 interceptions in 2005 and now is one of three players unhappy with their standing. Running back Thomas Jones and linebacker Lance Briggs remain absent from OTAs but are expected to show up in training camp. Vasher said not reporting for camp on July 26 was never an option.

"You sign a contract, and you have to definitely honor it," he said. "I don't think there will be any talks about my situation and my contract and this and that. It will be all completely team."






Source

  • http://www.suntimes.com/output/bears/cst-spt-bear20.html


Date

Tue 06/20/06, 10:37 pm EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
JuTMSY4Legend
1267 days ago
Score 2+-
Now, i'm not an expert on NFL contracts but...I agree if you a sign a contract you have to honor it, however, if he sucked, the bears could have cut him and this Is why i don't blame holdouts in the NFL...not all the time...
Permalink | Reply
ChristofMVP
1267 days ago
Score -1+-
With how bad the NFC North is this season - the Bears without Vasher would still be the odds-on favorite to win that division. GB is just plain bad. The Vikings are rebuilding as well. The Lions are just soft. Heck, an 8-8 record should win that division - how pathetic is that?
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
So, because they might win the division this year (we still don't know if the Packers will be better with the changes they made this off season), they shouldn't be at all concerned about losing a Pro-Bowl defensive back that led a great defensive team in interceptions? Winning a division with a .500 record should not be a goal to shoot for.
Permalink
ChristofMVP
1267 days ago
Score 1+-
Dude, you really think the Packers have a prayer to win the division? They will be lucky to match their win total from last year. Favre is physically on the downside of his career. Mentally? I don't even want to go there - the should I play or should I retire drama he had this offseason - I hope it was just for attention and nothing more. Because if it was, then Favre is toast. And what about the skill positions? You have nothing at WR! And the lines on both sides of the ball are weak. This team is rebuilding, not contending, this season.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1266 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm not talking about the Packers. I don't care who wins the division. My point isn't about the divisional competition. My point is that just winning the division is the lowest thing to aim for. They want to get into the playoffs and win, not just win the division. If they win the division but get beat by a wild card team in the playoffs, then who cares? They want to win in the post season, not just win a sorry division. And you don't win in the playoffs by letting Pro Bowl defensive backs go because you think that anything more than $450 thousand a year is exhorbitant.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
1267 days ago
Score 1+-
The Bears defense could win 8 games by itself. and the offense isn't inept as you think. I'd count on 5 wins in the division...I think they can pull atleast 3 somewhere else...They also play the AFC East, so besides the pats and maybe the improved dolphins, this team can beat the bill and jets. 7 wins. They also play the cardinals and 49ers and they could easily steal a game from the rams. 10 wins right there...I think this team is 10 win capable...no deserving but capable?
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1267 days ago
Score 1+-
I agree, their offense is underrated. They haven't performed the past few seasons, largely due to the revoling door they've had at quarterback thanks to injuries. Didn't they start the season on like their third string QB last year? Their offense won't ever be confused with the Rams or anything like that, but having Jones, Benson, Grossman and Griese, they should have enough talent on offense to win games.
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
Don't forget Muhammed.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
Of course, I always forget about Muhammed.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
The Bears are the best team in the NFC North without question, but I think they and Green Bay will do well this year because they will win more division games than they lose. If Green Bay can steal a game against the Bears, and win 3 out of the other 4 division games then they'll be 4-2 in their division. They should beat SF and ARI to go 6-4. They should win one against the AFC East, probably the Jets, so 7-7. GB also play two teams that were last in their division, i.e. the team last in the NFC South (New Orleans), and the NFC East (I forget who). We thrashed NO last year, so a repeat of that and a loss sees Green Bay at 8-8. If the Bears slip up, the Packers will be there or there-abouts. The games between the Bears and Packers will be huge, due to the Packers easier two games. The Bears play two division winners and the Pack play two division losers. That could make the difference.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Legend
1267 days ago
Score 1+-
RIght on Aswaff. Grossman is an above average QB and they're starting to give him weapons. Jones and Benson should guarantee the bears a decent running game and the line is pretty good. Look, this offense on a normal team could get you maybe 4 wins and combine that with the amazing defense and this team, I really think, could win 10...Plus, no one wants to go to soldier in january...well, except the panthers...
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1267 days ago
Score 1+-
It is kinda sad that Vasher will only make $900,000 over the next 2 years and Manning, the backup, will make 6 million in the same span if he isn't the starter.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
1267 days ago
Score 1+-
I agree. Normally I don't like players holding out, but I don't think he's being overly greedy here. I think he has absolutely earned the right to restructure his contract. No Pro-Bowl player should be making less than 1 mil a year.
Permalink
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
You have to wonder why the Bears are paying $3m/year on a backup. They could probably trade him for a cheaper alternative, or someone to help out elsewhere if necessary.
Permalink
EnyboDiv-I Stud
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
I have wondered that every day since the signing.
Permalink
FornelliTee-Baller
1267 days ago
Score 0+-
They spent $3 mill on a backup because the last few seasons they didnt, and it killed the team. Grossman gets hurt when the wind gusts over 10MPH.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Chicago_-_Nathan_Vasher_is_back..for_now"

This page was last modified 13:32, 21 June 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise