armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Changes I would make to MLB

11
Vote

by user Alex Holowczak

Having read a few articles recently based on the same theme, I thought I would write my own. I may introduce a few English ideas into the game, which would be a different slant on the idea.

AL/NL

I like the idea of two different versions of the game, i.e. one with a DH and one without. So I'd keep that.

Number of Teams

30 is too many. I'd reduce it to 24, and have 2 divisions of 6 in each League. The bottom six based on record from the previous season would be pushed down to Minor League status. The two divisions would be the West and the East. This would increase the stature of the game, as some of the poorer players at the bottom of the scale would drop down into the minors. This would increase Minor League Baseball's competitiveness, which would help when they get to the Majors.

Number of Games

162 games is far, far, too many. With 24 teams, I would split the schedule like this:

  • Divisional Opponents - 5 games, Home and Away (Total [7*5*2] 50 games)
  • Same League Opponents - 3 games, Home and Away (Total [3*6*2] 36 games)
  • Interleague Opponents in Corresponding division (i.e. both East divisions) - 3 games, Home or Away (Total [3*6] 18 games)
  • Other Interleague Opponents - 1 game, Home or Away (Total 6 games)
  • Total Number of Games - [50+36+18+6] 110

As a result, the season would last only four months, from April-May, then July-August. June would be the MLB "Summer Holiday". This month off would give the players a break they deserve, and help to resolve injuries.

The Playoffs

With 24 teams, I think 8 should get in. The top two in each division qualify, playing against the other team in their League. E.g. West 1 plays East 2 and East 2 plays West 1. I would introduce best of 5 series. It pretty much goes around the rotation once. The playoffs should be finished by October.

The Preseason

No one month, 30 game preseason. I would reduce it to 10 games, enough to give each pitcher two starts.

The Draft

With the month off in June the draft would fall there. This would give GMs time to evaluate their teams performance, and pick accordingly. The picks would be allowed to play in the Second Half of the season. Also, no compensatory picks - if a player retires, so be it.

Draft Contracts

Picking a player would tie the picking team into a contract with that player until the end of the season. He would then become a restricted free agent. Other players would be unrestricted.

All-Star Game

After the season, the All-Star Game would be played. No home-field advantage either. Players would be selected by the players themselves (but they cannot vote for themselves). Only the 25 players in the team at the start of the second half of the season would vote. This would be played in a rotating venue.

International Baseball

With the success of the World Baseball Classic, I would put this tournament in November. It would be held in one country, like the Soccer World Cup. If 12 teams take part, with 2 groups of 6 and the top 3 advancing it would be enough for one pitching rotation. The second stage of six would then go through another rotation. The top 2 in that would advance to a final. This would conclude after [5+5+1(+2 - day off between each stage)] 13 days, so would be over by the middle of November. I don't know whether it would be AL or NL Baseball, but I'd probably plump for NL, as it is more tactical.

The Draw

I would introduce the concept of a "drawn" baseball game. This would give a team one point. A win would earn two. MLB would work by this logic, and so would the World Baseball Classic. If a match was rained off, it would count as a no result, which would be worth one point - i.e. as much as a draw. A match must be played over nine innings to count as a result. Shorter matches will not count as a result IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. A match in MLB would be rearranged due to the advantage some teams would get by playing in a domed stadium.

The Trade

I would abolish the trade, and introduce a "Transfer List". Any player that wishes to leave his team, or vice versa, can opt to put themselves on the transfer list. This is essentially an unrestricted free agent pool, and the player can be approached by any team. The team owning the players contract would recieve a transfer fee as compensation. A transfer listed player can still play for his contracted team, however. When the player signs for a new team, the team then negotiates a contract with the player. Only once this has been signed can he play for the team. The transfer deadline would be the day before the second half of the season starts.

Everything Else...

I'd keep the same, unless someone changes my mind.

What do you all think of these ideas?


Date

Sun 07/02/06, 6:50 am EST


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
XinophDraft Pick
1273 days ago
Score -1+-
Yeah, shorter season - because making money is a bad thing! That's an awful idea. Abolish the trade - become the only major professional sports league in America without it! Terrible idea. About the only good idea here is a shorter preseason, and that goes way to far there.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakHall of Famer
1273 days ago
Score -1+-
Is uniqueness a bad thing? MLB makes enough money as it is.
Permalink
XinophDraft Pick
1273 days ago
Score 2+-
Uniqueness is a bad thing when it's a terrible idea.
Permalink
ChachiOSUDraft Pick
1273 days ago
Score 2+-
I'm not sure how some of these would work, like the relegation/promotion idea that we've discussed before, but I love the fact that you came with some fresh ideas rather than the same rehashed stuff. Nice job.
Permalink | Reply
The sharkDraft Pick
1273 days ago
Score 3+-
No way to cut back on franchises - maybe a cap to keep it where it is now is doable, but franchise reduction is just not practical nor possible. Cutting back on games would never work either. Baseball is a game that relies on its history and the accomplishments of its players. "Removing" that many games from the schedule would ruin the the established benchmarks and skew magical numbers of players and teams. It would alter history, essentially. And that would be a fatal error to the game.
Permalink | Reply
XinophDraft Pick
1273 days ago
Score 1+-
Very well said, Shark.
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
1273 days ago
Score 1+-
I don't have a problem with introducing unique aspects to the game, but I do have a problem with some of the changes that would make such drastic and abrupt changes to stats, like making the season 30% shorter, or allowing ties. I also have a problem with moving the All Star Game. The mid-summer classic is one of the great fixtures in all of pro sports, and you want to make it into the Pro Bowl? To my knowledge, of the three pro all-star games, the Pro Bowl is the least watched, because it's at the end of the season and because fans don't have an influence on who plays. You don't wanna do that to the All Star Game.
Permalink | Reply
Jgov05All-American
1273 days ago
Score 0+-
None of this would ever happen, and I don't think I'd want it to either.
Permalink | Reply
TartanVarsity Captain
1272 days ago
Score 1+-
The preseason is crucial to Major League teams, especially those with pitching vacancies. That many games are necessary for determine starters, rotations, and bullpen activity. Pitchers and catchers have to report early already. Reducing this would likely reduce the quality of pitching, not a good idea. Another possible change is restructuring the way the draft is run, putting caps on rookie salaries. As it is, teams cannot draft the player they want, they have to draft the player they can afford. This is a large reason why teams with lower payrolls stay bad. In the other major sports, the bad teams are rewarded with a higher draft pick to encourage parity, and they pick the best players for them, regardless of salary, whether due to the NFL/NHL salary caps, or the NBA's pay structure. Something needs to be done about the lowest payrolls still making money, the Pirates owners made $12 million last year. The operating income for the Indians last year was $34.6 million, the highest in the MLB. The Devil Rays, Royals, Pirates, Reds, Brewers, etc. all notoriously low payrolls, had positive operating incomes. This doesn't encourage the owners to spend more money to make their teams better. They're satisfied with the status quo. Something needs changed. http://www.f...ncome_1.html
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Changes_I_would_make_to_MLB"

This page was last modified 12:35, 2 July 2006. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise