armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Case Dismissed: Rutgers Player Drops Lawsuit

14
Vote

by Allonthefield

Quick, name the starting five on last year's Rutgers women's basketball team.

Remember, "Nappy headed hos" doesn't count.

The subject of shock jock radio host Don Imus's politically incorrect blast last spring, the Scarlet Knights were dragged into the national spotlight for reasons other than their dribbling and shooting abilities.

And until yesterday -- when she dropped her slander and defamation lawsuit against Imus --Rutgers junior Kia Vaughn believed the incident had damaged her reputation irreparably.

I beg to differ.

Don't get me wrong, Imus's remarks were completely and totally unacceptable. Racial profiling and name-calling has no place in our society today. Furthermore, I'm sure the words were shocking and hurtful to the recipients.

But in the long run, wouldn't an event of this nature be the best thing to happen to a person like Vaughn? I have no idea how good she is at basketball, nor what her WNBA prospects might be. Basketball star or not, she did nothing stupid or illegal to earn this publicity, so any name recognition derived from the incident would probably conjure up feelings of sympathy, right?

Imus has apologized, and regardless of whether it was right for him to reclaim his job, it's time to move on.

Someday, Vaughn herself will be applying for a job. The potential employer may scan the resume, look at Vaughn, and ask, "Hey, weren't you on the basketball team when Imus made those idiotic comments?" Vaughn's ability to answer "yes" might be just the thing that separates her from the pack.

Of course, it's altogether possible that Vaughn has thought through this herself and come to her senses. Or maybe, as her lawyer said in a statement Tuesday, she just wants to focus on school and basketball. Either way, dropping the lawsuit was the right decision.

Find more quality content at All on the Field sports blog.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ChristofMVP
815 days ago
Score -1+-
It was a stupid, pointless lawsuit that should have never been filed in the first place.
Permalink | Reply
Oh No RomoDraft Pick
814 days ago
Score 1+-
I never really cared for Imus, he's boring and looks goofy with that cowboy hat
Permalink | Reply
Dominator528JV Squad
814 days ago
Score 1+-
Your article brings up a good point on the ACTUAL effects of the comments after the initial justice was served
Permalink | Reply
AllonthefieldVarsity
814 days ago
Score 0+-
Right. Again, it's not OK that he said that. But in the long run, the girls are probably better off.
Permalink | Reply
4wheeldriveSoccer Kid
814 days ago
Score -1+-
Imus said something stupid, got fired. My boss sometimes says stupid stuff as do I. Let it go and get on with life.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
814 days ago
Score 1+-
When you and your boss say something stupid, it doesn't go out over the air to millions of listeners or viewers. It also doesn't get replayed day after day for weeks on end for millions more to hear. My guess is also that people don't put as much stock into the opinion of your boss as they do in a nationally-syndicated radio talk show host. There's a world of difference between the mistakes you make and the mistake Don Imus made.


Also, talking is his job. If he can't refrain from making racist statements (and this was FAR from being the first), he SHOULD get in trouble.
Permalink
J CunninghamVarsity Captain
814 days ago
Score 0+-
It would've been difficult, if not impossible, for Vaughn and her legal team to prove that Imus' comments had an inverse effect on her reputation. The burden would be on her to prove that, and that's often something not easily done in slander/libel cases. If anything, I would argue his comments positively affected the Rutgers players' reputations.
Permalink | Reply
BrittschrammRed-Shirting
814 days ago
Score -1+-
This lawsuit was a simple cash grab with ambulance-chasing lawyers that youw ould see on late night TV.
Permalink | Reply
ASwaffAll-American
814 days ago
Score 1+-
To argue this was good for her reputation is absolutely ridiculous. Just because you don't follow women's college basketball doesn't mean that nobody does. Just because you didn't know their names doesn't mean nobody did. It was another portrayal of African-American women as thuggish hos. Not only does that damage the reputations of those of whom the statement was made, but it was injurious to the entire African American community. I don't know that I agreed with the lawsuit, but to say this was good pub. is so small-minded that I don't even know what to make of it.
Permalink | Reply
Brendan.CanneyDiv-I Stud
814 days ago
Score 0+-
How can it damage your reputation when no one knows who you are? I mean, if you ask joe schmoe who Kia Vaughn is there going to shrug their shoulders and move on.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #1
814 days ago
Score 1+-
DBachmozart writes - This is the same type of crap I hear about slavery being not such a bad thing because after all,African Americans have a higher standard of living than do people anywhere in Africa. In the face of such stupidity and insensitivity, one can only shake their head and wonder - how is this person allowed to drive and vote?
Permalink
ASwaffAll-American
814 days ago
Score 1+-
Because, again, she does have a reputation in certain circles. Y'all need to get past this idea that NOBODY knows who they are just because YOU don't know who they are. Furthermore, for those who DON'T know who they are, the only thing you know is that they won a championship and very well may, in fact be, nappy-headed hos. Their reputation is damaged when the ONLY rep they have is as nappy-headed ho.


And, as I said, this wasn't only injurious to them. It was injurious to all African-Americans, a community that continues to have the reputation of thugs and hos thrust upon them.
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Case_Dismissed:_Rutgers_Player_Drops_Lawsuit"

This page was last modified 14:01, 12 September 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise