armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Rawbeezeitz
Just appreciate the Twilight Zone and stop trying to remake or copy it. It was perfect and cannot be duplicated.

More By Rawbeezeitz

AFL Eastern Division Preview (or AFC East Preview)
12 votes, 7 comments
Oberto Beef Jerky Presents: The All-Time All-Jerk All-Star Team
18 votes, 60 comments
Perfect Seats on a Perfect Day
12 votes, 2 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

What America's Loss to Brazil Might Mean

by Rawbeezeitz
created June 30, 2009, last edited July 23, 2009
13
Vote

It was a freak thing, almost lucky. At the very least, fortuitous. Andrea Dossena (wasn’t that an ocean liner that sank?) inadvertently knocked the ball into his own net, in a desperate attempt to prevent Brazil’s dangerous scoring attempt. It could prove to be the most important goal in US Soccer’s history. It could prove to be relatively irrelevant. Like the 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand that eventually spawned World War I, it’s the events AFTER the event that make the important event so important.



That own goal allowed the US to advance to the elimination stages of the Confeds Cup, beating Italy via tie-breakers. It wasn’t until the US defeated Spain 2-0 that anyone outside the most die-hard of American soccer enthusiasts took notice. It was the first time Spain had fallen since November of 2006, an unprecedented streak of dominance shattered by a relative upstart in the sport.


Few saw that match, apart from the already converted. But it got the attention of everyone else. The ensuing match with Brazil was ESPN’s highest rated US Soccer game since the World Cup (Source: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/soccerinsider/2009/06/miami_likes_soccer.html). And that’s not including those who watched on Univision.


The folks who tuned in weren’t disappointed. Although typically, blowing a 2-0 lead in soccer is a monumental choke on par with losing an 8 run lead in baseball, or a 4 goal lead in hockey. And to be frank, the US’s goals were on the freakish side of things. One was an accidentally brilliant finishing touch by Fulham’s Clint Dempsey.



Then there was Landon Donovan’s score, which was a nice conversion of Brazillian mistakery into a goal.



But the US deserves credit for being up 2-0. Dempsey’s goal was a bit of luck, that was set-up by good play. And Donovan’s goal looked like something that Brazil would typically inflict on the US. Then there was Tim Howard, who was so good that even when the Brazilians put the ball into the net, Howard still got credit for a save.


Losing 3-2 to Brazil is nothing to be ashamed of. In fact, it’s a sort of Pyrrhic defeat. It at least makes it seem possible that the US could be a consistent winner on the global stage. If they can beat Spain, and nearly beat Brazil, why not anyone else in the world?


Even if Americans refuse to become fans of soccer, they are fans of winning. As General George S. Patton put it, “Americans love a winner. America will not tolerate a loser.” And at this moment, Americans can anticipate winning some games in the 2010 World Cup.



So there’s hope. But there won’t be much patience from those people who just want to see winning, and care little for soccer. If the US exits early in 2010, these fans will quickly and easily find something else to do.


Of course, this hope potential has all happened before. In 2002, the US made it to the quarterfinals of the World Cup, before falling to Germany in a heartbreaking 1-0 loss. Oliver Kahn’s genetically engineered goalkeeping skills and a handball ended America’s hopes at international glory.



But what crushed the bits of hope leftover from the Germany game was a 2-1 loss to Ghana, and a group stage exit from the 2006 Cup. People forget that the US tied eventual champion Italy 1-1 just days before losing to Ghana. But there was also an embarrassingly bad 3-0 failure against the Czech Republic. The US national team may have wanted us, but we didn’t want to watch them.



I guess what I’m saying is that it’s up to the US team now to not only win games, but perhaps win the attention of a nation. There is a potential for hopefulness in the 2010 World Cup. But it won’t last long if the team doesn’t last long. Losing to Brazil and Italy is fine. Even France or Argentina would be okay. So long as it’s a close game, and it’s late in the tournament. Oh yeah, high scoring losses are more enjoyable as well.


The peripheral vision of America is on this team now.

Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
129 days ago
Score 4+-
I will admit that I am among those people who don't pay much attention to soccer. But I did pay attention in 2002 when the US was making some noise. I'd love to see soccer catch on in the US the way it has pretty much all over the world. Although I am of the opinion that if it hasn't caught on by now, it might not.


Archduke Franz Ferdinand? Patton? Brazillian mistakery? Pyrrhic defeat? Love it! A brief history lesson, hilarious wordplay and a Pyrrhic victory? Makes it so much more enjoyable to read. Don't read into this - the article was really good. But these touches are great.


When I first met my wife (before we were even dating), I used the term "Pyrrhic victory" (don't ask why, I can't remember now) and mispronounced it. I'm not even sure how to pronounce it now, and I rarely, if ever use the term anymore. This is because she said something along the lines of: "It's (correcting my pronounciation)! God, it sounds so stupid when people pronounce it that way!"


So I forced a smile (I think), meekly bid her adieu and got the hell out of there as fast as I could. Ah, love. It's just such a beautiful thing. Unless you mispronounce something...
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 2+-
2002 was a nice run. I think losing a 1-0 game (as opposed to 3-2) was harder for non-soccer fans to enjoy. There was also the frustration of that handball, and Donovan's hesitations facing Kahn.


Two things that piss me off almost more than anything: people mispronouncing words, and people who correct people who mispronounce words.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
129 days ago
Score 2+-
It's easy to forget that if not for Park-Ji Sung's goal against Portugal in group stage there would've been a chance for Portugal and not the US to advance out of group stage. Poland wiped out the US 3-1.


I really get annoyed with the handball thing because if you call the penalty it's not a guaranteed goal. Even if the US did score what is to say they were going to win?


We'll never know.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Well, Germany's my #1 team on the international level, so I was rooting for Germany in that game. It wasn't an intentional or even blatant handball, but it should have been a penalty. 80% of PKs score, but against Kahn it's probably more like 75%. So the US has a 3:1 chance to tie the game. And then who knows, they might get through extra time and get into PKs, which are a complete crapshoot.


But you're right, the US's best chance in that game was to get just a bit lucky. And they would have probably lost to South Korea in the semis.
Permalink
Sj-hypocycloidAll-American
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Rawb - I guess I am fortunate you weren't there then. I can kinda laugh about it now (several years later), but it wasn't funny then.


I'll be looking for a Rubicon reference in your next article.
Permalink
Pittsburgh GunnyMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 3+-
As a long time supporter of US Soccer, just let me say that I think what the US accomplished in South Africa was terrific. I do not think though that the team will make it out of the group stages with the current coach. I don't think he has the tactical awareness to compete with the bigger footballing nations. I hope that I am proved wrong. Perhaps a win or a draw at the Azteca will change my feeling about Coach Bradley.


Oh, and great stuff as always Rawb!
Permalink | Reply
SSreportersLegend
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Here's what I thought about after watching the game twice.


1.) Bob Bradley plays favorites. There is no logical reasoning behind putting in Sacha Kljestan and Jonathan Bornstein in a 2-2 game and taking off Feilhaber and Altidore. I wouldn't have minded substituting the very tired backline but instead he put in two of the most inept players on the team. If you counted the number of times Kljestan gave away possession in a 15 minute timespan and turned it into a drinking game.......you would probably get a .99 blood-alcohol level. Why does Bradley put them in there? He could have no vision for true talent (Adu, Torres, etc.), or is just going with his Chivas USA guys. Either way to sub that late and put in crap guys like Sacha and Jonathan is retarded.


2.) Tim Howard should get a raise. That's just fact. This defense is terrible even with a solid center back like Gooch and there is no pressure on the wings (Maicon got all the room he wanted). You could see his frustration with having Brazilians get past them with ease.


3.) DeMarcus Beasley is done. Sorry but I really think a part of the reason the US started playing better is when Bradley woke up and benched Beasley's ineffective butt.



I'm on the skeptical side as far as the future. The Confederations Cup was a success for the US but how much of that can you attribute to luck and probability?


Why is it that under the Bob Bradley era we've TWICE blown leads after halftime? Since 1993 the US was 88-1-2 when leading at the half. He refuses to make tactical adjustments and he is so friggin stubborn. Sunday was a perfect example. He has a great lineup, but his favoritism and tactical ineptness is too much. That is not the man to lead us to the deep stages of the World Cup.



And have we not been here before? Have we not beaten or played Brazil competitively on three occasions (1994, 1998, 2009) and have seen articles and talk on major sports media sites that US Soccer has turned the corner? What's happened every time?


This country markets itself to the world better than anyone else. We look like laughing stocks because we aren't humble after playing close to the vest or even defeating a superior team. Immediately we're world beaters. Then we flop against Honduras.


It's a rinse, repeat cycle that's been fed to the American audience for a long time. At this point I'm not sure they'll be willing to accept another failure after the events in the Confederations Cup. Because if (and they most likely will) they qualify we'll get the usual "Are they contenders?" crap that the media reads from the folks over at Big Soccer.


If the 2010 World Cup is another 1998-like bust then the public is eventually going to quit.


When we win we gloat, when we lose we either ignore the team or roll out the excuses.


Only time will tell.


And FIRE BOB BRADLEY.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Yeah. I guess my point wasn't that US has turned a corner, it's sniffing around a corner. You're right though, every time the US puts together 2 or 3 solid performances, the US Soccer people glorify them and say "we've made it." US Soccer hasn't "made it" until LOSING against solid teams is unacceptable, and winning against solid teams is expected.


Playing Brazil close and beating Spain is nice, but they also lost 3-1 to Italy, and 3-0 to Brazil. The Brazilians did not care about this match until down 2-0. The US had NO pressure on it, and played relaxed. But look at how tense and nervous Donovan was vs. Germany in '02. When this team puts pressure on itself, it fails. When it has no pressure, it flourishes.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Don't get me started on Donovan. He's an overrated man who gets a lot more credit than he deserves.


Anywhoo, I wasn't referring to your article as US Soccer "turning the corner" but the media as a whole. It's setting the team up for failure. They punched above their weight and almost made it. But almost doesn't count.


3-1 to Costa Rica, 2-1 to Trinidad and Tobago, 2-1 to Ghana, 1-0 to Morocco (did no one remember that before our WC 06 campaign?), 0-0 with Guatemala, etc.


The US is the best team in CONCACAF, bar none. It's when they go up against other teams that give a damn outside of CONCACAF do they get hit with reality.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
129 days ago
Score 0+-
Great article rawb, But the US need to toughen up a bit good perfomance by them but I still think to progress they need to be able to beat mexico in the azteca. And Costa Rica away to show they can win tough away matches. Bradley's a good coach and yes he plays favorites but with this performance we are stuck with him like it of not for the 2010 world cup if we qualify. SSreporters is spot on with his thoughts on the team. I hope for the world cup Edu, and the Jermaine "I'm not good enough to play consistently for Germany so I'm an american now because my dad knocked up a german woman and but I grew up in Germany" Jones Can add a little toughness and some defence To give Howard a break. Beasley will be dropped and never to be heard from on the International level again. And If the US get a favorable group would just like to see them advance out of the group but my gut says they won't and this is the pinnacle second place.
Permalink | Reply
Anonymous Fanatic #2
129 days ago
Score 0+-
nothing?
Permalink | Reply
LASportsblogAAA-er
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Rawbee good article, truly. As for the soccer points and the debate worthy topics I'm going to avoid them I think. I don't think anything new can be gained by us discussing them. Plus I'm just tired of hashing these things out with the people out there who don't fully understand the game and it's nuisance. People who are "win it all or don't care" because I don't care for that attitude brought by the American public, and people who have maybe a 20-30% full understanding of the game but give opinion on it like they are fulling into it. Basically I love the improvement in the squad, enjoy the extra attention and appreciate the raised interest. But I'm no longer interested in talking about and breaking down the games and the state of the game in the U.S. because I'm just tired of talking to the wall.
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 0+-
I think we can all agree though, that soccer isn't dying in the US. It might always be a side dish sport in the mainstream, but it's not going away.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
129 days ago
Score 1+-
absolutely Rawbee. I think I'm perfectly content with that too. I'd rather be a rabid fan of the side dish and be misunderstood then be surrounded by half wits and drunks who don't choose understand what their watching or the proud tradition of fans across Europe and South America who point and laugh at our "mainstream fans". The posers at the NYRB game you came across if you will.
Permalink
SSreportersLegend
129 days ago
Score 1+-
"mainstream fans".


You mean LA Galaxy? ;-)


I will concede the Sounders have the best fans in MLS. Even though I live here I'm a TFC fan first but I'm rooting for Sounders FC to have great success.


But I wish that the Dallas crowds and LA crowds would consist of real fans and not soccer moms and their kids. I think it will change slowly.


One more thing, as a TFC fan....


OHHHHH THE RED BULLS ARE SH*TE!!!! OHHHHHHH THE RED BULLS ARE SH*TE!!!!!!!!!
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
129 days ago
Score 1+-
Sure SSR, that's a good example. But the "real" fans we speak of, your Old Firms and assorted fan bases are built over time, not over night.

I could even be blamed for being a soccer diehard but not a real MLS fan. That's fine to me because I want soccer at it's highest levels and that's where my support concerns are.

MLS is what it is, a 15 year league growing slowly, but positively year by year.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 1+-
The support for the game in this country starts with the national team. The sport isn't strong enough here to be strengthened much by club support. MLS teams are good venues for viewing a decent level of the game being played in person, but shelling out the $5 to get Fox Soccer Channel is an even better way to see the game at its highest, as well as tuning in to watch the Champs League.


I'd wager there are more real Man United fans in this country, than real fans of all the MLS teams combined. And that's how it will be for a while. To me, the MLS is merely something to bring children to, and to develop US National Team players.
Permalink
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 1+-
I'm with LASB, if the sport never gains even 1 new American fan, that's fine with me. I have cable and the internet. I have and love my Arsenal FC, and die deutsche Fußballnationalmannschaft.
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #3
129 days ago
Score 0+-
We Love you Tottenham!!!! We Love you Tottenham!!!!!! Stand Up Stand Up if you hate arsenal!!!!!!!
Permalink | Reply
RawbeezeitzMajor Leaguer
129 days ago
Score 0+-
We Love you Tottenham


We try not to swear here.
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Rawbeezeitz | June 30, 2009 | June 2009 | Soccer Opinions

Don't Miss

Phillies World Series 2009: A Year Later, and They Still Don't Want Us
Sorry, But I'm Not Sorry
2009 NHL Preview
In Which Ricketts Wins World Series
2009 Week 3: Let’s Talk About Your Favorite NFL Team

In the News

Tim Lincecum is facing misdemeanor possession charges for marijuana.

Comments of the Day

0 Only shows what everyone has been saying over the years,...
0 Did you watch Cliff Lee? And if you think the Phils quit, then...
0 I"ve been saying this for months: after the three big acq...
0 As for The oldest man"s comment, the main reason why I be...
0 Jason Werth? Howard struggled because he can"t hit leftie...
0 It"s actually funny that you say that. I do remember off ...
0 And what about Jayson Werth? He"s a good contact hitter, ...
0 Very good points. How about best pitching staffs?

Play the Quiz Game

Who gave up Barry Bonds Record Breaking 756th Home Run

New Articles

Week 9 Postgame: Trick or Treat?
Dear FIFA, UEFA, & Football Fans... It is time.
Make it Number 27
Baseball players
Intercepted Season(s)

Retrieved from "http://armchairgm.wikia.com/Article:What_America%27s_Loss_to_Brazil_Might_Mean"

This page was last modified 17:24, 30 June 2009. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise